• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

Why don't arts organizations have critics in residence?

April 7, 2009 by Douglas McLennan 14 Comments

Lots of arts organizations have blogs on their websites. Most aren’t very good, and they’re difficult to maintain well. There are many out-of-work critics. And less and less arts coverage in local press. So why not critics-in-residence?

Yeah independence. But let’s suspend for a moment the idea that criticism’s highest calling is simply to inform consumer choice. If instead the idea is to promote informed and interesting commentary, then who has more of an interest in this than artists and arts organizations? If readers knew that a critic was in residence rather than being paid by a local news organization, they might read the commentary differently, but so what? Would you rather read PR boilerplate that nobody believes or the observations of someone trying to engage with the art, even if they’re paid to do so by the institution?

Our ability to judge news sources is much more sophisticated now that it used to be. There is value in a Yelp or Amazon review even if it’s not vetted. If the critic in residence was clearly labeled as such, the conflict is transparent and readers could make up their own minds.

There are critics in the traditional press who pander. A critic in residence who pandered wouldn’t have much following. But what kind of statement would it make for an arts organization to invite a critic to be really critical and help spread that criticism? Maybe a festival with a beginning and end would be a good testing ground.

Of course there are big ethical issues. But art critics already write catalog essays for museums. Music critics write program notes. Newspapers take ads from arts organizations. Rules have been developed to define the ethics of each situation. Why couldn’t there be a critic-in-residence protocol that helped promote intelligent discourse and didn’t compromise the reader, the critic or the institution?

I’m not arguing that critics inside arts organizations (hmnnn… embedded critics?) is any kind of substitute for the Times review or NYRB essay. But the definitions, forms and conventions of journalism are being prodded, poked and reconsidered, and the idea maybe deserves some consideration before being dismissed. Currently there’s no ethical standard for artsbloggers, yet some bloggers have big influence. If there were standards, who would set them?

While I’m on the topic of institutions criticizing themselves in public, I’ve always loved The Stranger‘s long-running Public Editor column, which trashes the contents of each week’s issue. Not only is it fun reading, but it declares that The Stranger doesn’t take itself too seriously.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Trevor O'Donnell says

    April 7, 2009 at 11:47 am

    I’m not so sure about the in-house “critic” but I do like the idea of someone who serves as the communications intermediary between the arts organization and the public. Arts organizations have a habit of talking down to their publics, talking at them or boasting about themselves in public in hopes that that potential audiences will find them appealing. The idea of having an audience-oriented staffer whose job it is to translate all the self-congratulatory insider language into understandable vernacular seems like a great idea. Critics probably come closest to the ideal and if they’re paid to interpret and advocate rather than to judge, it might avoid the inherent ethical obstacles.
    Now let’s see, a salary of $65k with benefits plus overhead…

    Reply
  2. Donovan Gray says

    April 7, 2009 at 6:06 am

    Hiring your own critic used to be all the rage in Europe. Sounds like a good idea, Doug!

    Reply
  3. davey says

    April 7, 2009 at 8:51 pm

    "Of course there are big ethical issues." what are they and why didnt you include them with this blog?
    "But art critics already write catalog essays for museums. Music critics write program notes." programme notes are the furthest we can get from critique.
    "Newspapers take ads from arts organizations." we all know this is fantasy exagration paying the usual attention to embellishment for only the p[urposes of blurring.
    "Rules have been developed to define the ethics of each situation." what are these rules?
    "Why couldn't there be a critic-in-residence protocol that helped promote intelligent discourse and didn't compromise the reader, the critic or the institution?" what do you mean specifically by "intelligent discourse?"

    Reply
  4. David Copelin says

    April 7, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    The theatre has had in-house critics for years: we're called dramaturgs. Our function is only secondarily to educate the public; primarily, we serve the institution as an ideal "pre-audience" audience for the artists. We also do research and perform many other functions. Of course issues of independence can arise, but the best dramaturgs have a good deal of (largely unseen) influence on their theatre's programming and other aesthetic choices.

    Reply
  5. Douglas McLennan says

    April 7, 2009 at 11:47 pm

    @Davey: Ethical issues? Obvious. The critic would be paid by the arts organization, so why would the reader trust what the critic was writing? You say program notes are "the farthest we can get from critique." Some might be, but not all. Not quite sure what your point is about newspapers and ads. Mine was that the editorial and business sides of most news organizations have a firewall between them. Arts organizations don't buy ads directly from the people writing about them. As for "intelligent discourse", I meant discussion of work and performance that was more in the form of discussion rather than only a pronouncement of value in the thumbs up/down manner.

    Reply
  6. Charlotte says

    April 8, 2009 at 6:55 am

    A potentially better idea, I think, is one I’ve discussed with colleagues before: an independent publication funded by a consortium of arts organizations. Because it would have more than one institutional stakeholder, I think such a publication would have a bit more credibility with readers. Many museums already publish member magazines. What if, instead, all the museums in town published a single magazine together, and all sent it to their members? Or, to slice it a different way, all the contemporary arts museums in the country? It’d create opportunities for cross-marketing (ie. the contemporary art museum members now get info about historic shows at the fine arts museum down the road, too, or the Rothko Chapel member reads about happenings at Mass MoCA and plans a vacation). I think it’d be a more interesting publication for readers, to say nothing of the obvious cost-saving benefits. It means communications people (like me) would have to let go a little, and I can already hear the objections from development (“you’re going to share our donors?!?!”), but the fact is that most arts consumers already frequent more than one organization. We don’t own our members.
    Here’s the rub, though: where does the money come from? I see it coming from the marketing line. Are you ready to see everyone reduce their advertising spending with Artforum and Art in America to make this happen? It could be the kiss of death for the existing media outlets that are already suffering from reduced advertising income.

    Reply
  7. Douglas McLennan says

    April 8, 2009 at 7:18 am

    @Charlotte: Great idea. There have been a number of local publications around the country that have tried doing this by selling ads to arts organizations. But it’s tough to get together enough such revenue to make it work. There already exist publications focused on specific areas of the arts (and you mention a couple of them), but arts magazines have always had difficulty making an independent go. One of the reasons the NYT A&L section is so fat with ads (and is, I’ve been told, the most profitable newspaper section in the country) is that not only is it the go-to place to read about the arts but it also brings with it a huge general audience who buys the paper for other reasons. While the standalone arts audience is big, it doesn’t necessarily deliver the general reader.

    Reply
  8. Charles Desmarais says

    April 8, 2009 at 8:55 am

    David Copelin’s point about dramaturgs is spot on, and it could be extended to include the curator in an art museum, the educator in museums and other organizations – anyone charged with interpretation and otherwise “promot[ing] intelligent discourse.”
    Not every educator or curator or dramaturg is up to the task, but they should aspire to be great critics, in the sense you are using the word. (And there’s nothing to say that arts organizations that have less-than-great critical minds on staff would do any better hiring competent critics-in-residence.)

    Reply
  9. cathy says

    April 8, 2009 at 9:41 am

    Trevor brings it home: $65K with benefits. If newspapers can’t afford these critics, what makes you think that art organizations can — especially in this economic climate?

    Reply
  10. Douglas McLennan says

    April 8, 2009 at 10:02 am

    @cathy: I’m not suggesting a full-time job with benefits. I’m not thinking staff critic. I’m thinking little residencies. The Banff or Aspen festivals, for example, bring a critic in for a week and the critic writes about the festival and leads discussions, say…

    Reply
  11. Charlotte says

    April 9, 2009 at 7:37 am

    Doug, just wanted to clarify, part of the reason I think an arts community-published magazine could succeed where, you rightly point out, commercial niche magazines have a tough time is that it would serve development and marketing needs simultaneously, and the departments would theoretically both contribute to its funding, unlike commercial magazines, which are only funded by marketing dollars via advertising.

    Reply
  12. Lori Ortiz says

    April 10, 2009 at 6:20 am

    Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival in MA has a changing “Scholar-in-Residence” who lectures and writes in-house educational material.
    The two I know write or wrote criticism outside of this gig, at other times in their career — Suzanne Carbonneau and Philip Szporer (Montreal-based.)

    Reply
  13. Lenny Campello says

    April 13, 2009 at 9:51 am

    yeah buddy!
    That’s such an excellent and simple concept!
    Lenny

    Reply
  14. Ann says

    May 6, 2009 at 5:30 am

    I really like the way Artist Organized Art has handled this (http://artistorganizedart.org/commons). It seems they have been making the case by point of practice for a while. Why don’t you interview them here and develop this piece?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • Are Orchestras A Ticket Or An Art? Maybe We're Thinking About The (Made Up) Model Wrong
  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • So What Exactly Is A "Quantitative" Measure Of The Arts?
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
April 2009
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar   May »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in