• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

More Valuable – The Ticket Buyer Or The Donor?

April 30, 2009 by Douglas McLennan 3 Comments

Give an arts organization $1000 and they’ll put your name in the program. Buy $1000 worth of tickets and they’ll tell you that the cost of your ticket only covered 55 percent (or 40 percent or 30 percent) of the cost of you being there. Then a few months later, long after the performance, they try to hit you up for more money. Gee thanks.

donorwall.jpgMaybe this is backwards. Who’s the more valuable member of your community? The person who gives you money but otherwise doesn’t have much to do with you, or the person who buys tickets and shows up for every performance? A thousand dollar donation is the same as $1000 of ticket revenue in the bank. Except it isn’t.

Studies of how people make their cultural choices show that personal recommendations top the list. Most arts organizations try to incentivize donors by giving them perks. Your name in the program, special meet-and-greets with artists, club rooms, even your name in golden letters on the wall of the theatre if you give enough.

What incentives do ticket-buyers get?

A ticket sold isn’t just a ticket sold. One audience member isn’t the same as another. Communities are hierarchical, and if you can identify the hierarchies and incentivize them you can push people up the ladder. Along the way they’ll do things for you (and for themselves). People like to be rewarded for engaging with you.

Sure the performance should be enough reward, I know. But if word-of-mouth is the most powerful way of getting more people into the theatre, how do you promote that word-of-mouth? In online social networks, participation is rewarded for the frequency and quality of that participation, and even small recognitions encourage people to participate at higher levels.

If you have an audience member who brings five friends, find a way to reward them. If they bring 10 friends, give them something more. Every arts organization has a page in their program listing the names of people who contributed money and at what level. How about a page that lists the names of people who brought in more people? Reward them with free tickets to bring in even more. Make them feel like a partner and they’ll bring in even more.

The Obama campaign was brilliant at empowering supporters the more they participated. Supporters could sign up for their own page on the Obama website where they could make a personal case for the candidate. They could pledge to raise $1,000 from their friends, then send out emails that directed them to mybarackobama.com to make that personal appeal. It worked brilliantly.

There’s another thing. Most organizations don’t give people enough ways to support them. Some people can’t afford to give money, but they’d be happy to recruit their friends on your behalf. Some people don’t have extra time to commit to fundraising or being on your board, but they’d be happy to talk you up. All it takes sometimes is empowering them to do it. And in imaginative ways that don’t always cost you money or resources.

Who’s making the personal appeal for you? And how are you rewarding them?

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Trevor O'Donnel says

    May 1, 2009 at 6:53 am

    I was with you until you said, "All it takes sometimes is empowering them to do it. And in imaginative ways that don't always cost you money or resources."
    The idea of rewarding people who buy (or get others to buy) a lot of tickets has been around for decades but it hasn't taken hold because it's a 'sales' initiative and sales is not a part of our business model. We're a marketing culture. We use media to tell customers about our events and then wait for them to buy tickets – in pairs.
    Sales involves connecting to customers the way development connects to donors; the more they give, the stronger, more direct and more personal the connection. But we only connect to ticket buyers through low-level service staff or, God forbid, telemarketers. And in most organizations, the worst service is set aside for the people who buy the most tickets.
    For Obama, these 'sales' connections were top priority and he spent tens of millions of dollars making them happen. When arts organizations make half-hearted stabs at sales programs, it's like John McCain trying to broaden his base using that crazy Internet thing.

    Reply
  2. Douglas McLennan says

    May 4, 2009 at 12:43 am

    @Trevor: I'm not arguing that the sales relationship (and thanks for pointing out the distinction) should be done on the cheap. I was just trying to say that there are lots of ways to incentivize loyal buyers and that not all of them require big investment.

    Reply
  3. Catrina Boisson says

    May 4, 2009 at 2:05 am

    I agree wholeheartedly with both Douglas and Trevor. In this day of information overload, there is no more selling, only buying. As consumers, we buy from organizations and individuals we trust — it's the strength of the relationship that counts.
    At NJPAC, we identify our most valuable customers based on their OVERALL relationship with the organization — taking into account the length, breadth and depth of that relationship (both ticket buying and contributions). Best customers receive personalized end-to-end service. Dedicated reps make their dinner reservations, reserve parking, call patrons about new performances they may want to consider (based on past attendance), alert them about traffic and follow up on any issues they may have had. As their relationship with their rep develops, positive word of mouth is a natural outcome (Net Promoter Score among these patrons is off the charts), but we also incent these customers to bring friends.
    And the best part — this is not just a marketing initiative, it's part of an institutional commitment to putting the customer at the center of all we do!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,823 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

@AJDoug

Tweets by @AJDoug

Recent Comments

  • Douglas McLennan on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “True – but the Swiftie phenomenon demonstrates how deeply people want to engage and that they’re willing to pay dearly…” Jul 24, 21:25
  • Tom Corddry on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “An additional data point: Taylor Swift drew 144,000+ to her two Seattle concerts, at an average ticket price of $123.…” Jul 24, 15:34
  • Steven Lavine on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “Terrific account. Like so many of our social media Augmented crises, it’s hard to see a way forward.” Jul 24, 13:52
  • Howard Mandel on Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance: “At least it’s clear the “ long-tail” argument was a canard.” Jul 24, 06:10
  • Sam Hodak on Too Many Artists Or Not Enough Value?: “So what you’re telling me is… make a VR experience” May 12, 00:03
  • Mark on What If Disruption Was Just A Tech Con Game?: “Thank you” Mar 19, 13:15
  • Douglas McLennan on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “Hi John: Yes – remember over the last decade how Big Data was going to change everything and drive every…” Nov 26, 07:46
  • John McCann on Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale: “I haven’t read this book, yet your review triggered an insight about information shared within organizations and how so much…” Nov 26, 03:57
  • Richard Voorhaar on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “We have reached the point where the average American has no attention span. A 3-4 minute pop tune is all…” Jun 10, 11:22
  • Alan Harrison on The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?: “Brilliant piece, Doug. It’s why, in my own columns on LinkedIn and Medium, I may have become more strident recently…” Jun 8, 15:46

Top Posts

  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • We Asked: What's the Biggest Challenge Facing the Arts?
  • American Orchestras Could Learn Something from South Dakota
  • The New York Philharmonic's New Hall Is An Opportunity To Rethink The Orchestra Experience (And Amplify It)
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World

Recent Posts

  • American Orchestras Could Learn Something from South Dakota November 22, 2023
  • Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance July 23, 2023
  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale November 25, 2022
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World June 26, 2022
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts? June 7, 2022
April 2009
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Mar   May »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • American Orchestras Could Learn Something from South Dakota
  • Inflection Point? A Crisis in Paying for Culture in the Age of Abundance
  • Still Amusing Ourselves to Death: Information as Cautionary Tale
  • The UnderTow: What the new Edinburgh Fringe Tells us about a Post-COVID World
  • The UnderTow: The High-flying Oil Industry fears “Demand Destruction.” Should the Arts?

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in