• Home
  • About
    • diacritical
    • Douglas McLennan
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

diacritical

Douglas McLennan's blog

A New Video Age

September 20, 2006 by Douglas McLennan 3 Comments

In just about a year-and-a-half, YouTube has become the biggest website on the internet. Each day 65,000 videos are uploaded to the site. One hundred million videos are streamed from the site everyday. It’s an amazing service – easy to use both as a watcher and as an uploader. People are adding video of every kind, from things they’ve shot themselves to current TV to classic videos. Video is finally getting the digital revolution that came to photo sharing with flickr a few years back and music six or seven years ago with Napster.
Of course the popularity of the site means that producers of video will have to rethink their business models. The music industry blames downloading for the downturn in CD sales and has been energetically suing its customer base. There are signs that the same might happen with video. Last week Universal threatened heavy legal action against the video sharing sites. But then this week, Warner strides boldly into the future, announcing a deal with YouTube to offer free video. The site will be ad supported.
It’s an interesting move, one that suggests lessons learned from the music downloading experience. Free is the primary currency on the internet, and people are used to getting much for nothing. Successful companies such as YouTube or MySpace are able to gather enormous numbers of loyal fans who incorporate the websites into their daily lives. Those millions of visitors are worth something. We’re still in the early stages of learning how to make money on the internet, but one thing has proven consistent over time: more people = more money.
Of course, iTunes has proven there’s a business model that works. And already companies are finding that video can be successful in the iTunes model.

Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger said that Disney has already sold 125,000 movies on Apple’s iTunes store. Disney just began selling films from its movie library on iTunes last week. Iger said the downloads have generated $1 million in revenue already and that movie downloads could easily generate $50 million in sales a year for Disney. “We believe this is just the beginning,” Iger said.

Of course, then there are the failures. Napster, which kicked off the downloading phenomenon, is nearly out of business a struggling to find and buyer for its pay service.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Filed Under: main

Comments

  1. Anonymous says

    September 20, 2006 at 1:54 am

    A better business model YouTube should consider is to allow individual viewers to download content for a fee. The fee could then be shared between the creator of the new work and the copyright holder(s) of the work(s) used to create the new work (if any), with YouTube taking a small percentage as a handling fee.

    Reply
  2. Chris says

    October 11, 2006 at 2:03 am

    How 'bout keeping current on postings? As you may have noticed, YouTube has taken a major turn since this was posted…21 days ago!

    Reply
  3. Nuno H says

    November 13, 2006 at 9:42 am

    Great post. Let’s see what happens now Google has bought YouTube.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Douglas McLennan

I’m the founder and editor of ArtsJournal, which was founded in September 1999 and aggregates arts and culture news from all over the internet. The site is also home to some 60 arts bloggers. I’m a … [Read More...]

About diacritical

Our culture is undergoing profound changes. Our expectations for what culture can (or should) do for us are changing. Relationships between those who make and distribute culture and those who consume it are changing. And our definitions of what artists are, how they work, and how we access them and their work are changing. So... [Read more]

Subscribe to Diacritical by Email

Receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,851 other subscribers
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

Archives

Recent Comments

  • David E. Myers on How Should we Measure Art?: “A sophisticated approach to “measuring” incorporates all of the above, with clear delineation of how each plays a part if…” Nov 3, 16:20
  • Tom Corddry on How Should we Measure Art?: “Reading this brought to mind John Cage’s delineation of different ways to experience a Beethoven symphony–live in concert, on a…” Nov 3, 01:58
  • Abdul Rehman on A Framework for Thinking about Disruption of the Arts by AI: “This article brilliantly explores how AI is set to revolutionize everything, much like the digital revolution did. AI tools can…” Jun 8, 03:49
  • Richard Voorhaar on Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part): “I think we’ve lost several generations. My parents generation was the last that really supported, and knre something about classical…” May 15, 12:08
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Language, yes; really characterization. Investments and margins don’t become subsidies and taxes whether or not markets “are working” – I’m…” Mar 8, 07:13
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “So what you’re arguing is language? – that investments aren’t subsidies and margins aren’t taxes? Sure, when markets are working.…” Mar 7, 21:42
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Doug: You can, if you like, buy a jailbroken Android, install GrapheneOS, and sideload apps from the open-source ecosystem at…” Mar 7, 16:17
  • Douglas McLennan on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Franklin: Thanks for the response, But a few points: My Chinese solar panel example was to make the point that…” Mar 7, 12:46
  • Steven Lavine on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “Terrific essay, with no prospect to a different future” Mar 7, 09:53
  • Franklin on How Subsidy for Big Tech Wrecked the Arts (and Journalism): “The economics of this essay are incoherent. The CCP was creating yuan ex nihilo and flooding it into domestically produced…” Mar 7, 08:49

Top Posts

  • If Dance Can't Pay Its Dancers What Does It Mean To Be A Professional Dancer?
  • Are Orchestras A Ticket Or An Art? Maybe We're Thinking About The (Made Up) Model Wrong
  • Is The Institutionalization Of Our Arts A Dead End?
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • "Art Is Good?" Not Much Of An Argument For Art Is It?

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills January 12, 2025
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art January 7, 2025
  • How Should we Measure Art? November 3, 2024
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part) May 13, 2024
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem May 6, 2024
September 2006
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Jun   Oct »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Creativity Versus Skills
  • How Digital AI Twins could Transform how We Make Art
  • How Should we Measure Art?
  • Classical Music has Lost a Generation. Blame the Metadata (in part)
  • When “Vacuum Cleaner for Babies” Beat Taylor Swift: Fixing the Music Streaming Problem

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in