• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Self-delusion through surveys

January 5, 2004 by Andrew Taylor

An odd little survey reported by the BBC shows the disconnect between audience intention and audience action, as well as the sad state of surveying in decision-making. The study concludes that tons of people have intentions to attend more arts events in the coming year, but few have shown any effort to actually do so.

Here’s the summary results from the survey of UK citizens:


About 90% of the 1,000 respondents said they would aim to see more theatre, opera and exhibitions in 2004….Only one in 10 went to the ballet or opera in 2003, despite research suggesting nearly 70% of UK citizens think they are ‘cultured.’

There are so many opportunities to question the study and its conclusion, it’s hard to know where to begin. Let’s start with the most obvious: what people say in response to a survey and what they actually do are often completely disconnected. Just think about it, if I walked up to you and asked ‘In 2004, do you plan to attend more ballet performances or less? More theater or less? More exhibitions or less?’ how would you respond?

Assume that you perceive yourself to be a thoughtful, cultured individual (which apparently 70 percent of the responders believed). And assume I won’t ask you to back it up by actually buying a ticket or making any monetary commitment to your answer.

It recalls the great line by policy researchers Becky Pettit and Paul DiMaggio in their review of public support of the arts in America (available here): ‘To summarize briefly, we found that support for federal funding of the arts is a yard wide and an inch deep.’ In other words, lots of people are happy to voice their support for arts and culture in federal funding, but few would actually be willing to allocate their own tax money to do so.

In response to the results, the director of the Artsworld TV channel that did the survey made the classic conceptual jump to suggest that the answer to that massive demand but limited action was television (recall my recent post suggesting if you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail):


‘As a cultured nation it is clear that we are eager to experience the arts, yet for various reasons are unable to attend live performances…..For those who want to be cultured but simply don’t have the time, opera on the box is now a real alternative to a box at the opera,’ she said.

To me, a study suggesting that 9 in 10 want to buy more of a product, but only 1 in 10 actually buy it shows a fairly deep gulf between intent and action, and a fairly weak link between wanting more and actually buying more. Instead of pushing out to empty couches through the television set (we’ve seen so many try and fail), it might be more worthwhile to dig deeper into why these 90 percent attribute value to cultural experience, and what would make them put their energy where their good intentions are.

Thanks to Mark Nerenhausen for pointing me to the article. Thanks to anyone else out there that cares to comment.

Filed Under: main

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • The bother of bylaws July 8, 2025
    Does your arts nonprofit's map for action match the terrain?
  • Minimum viable everything July 1, 2025
    Getting better as an arts organization doesn't always (or even often) mean getting bigger.
  • The rise and stall of the nonprofit arts June 24, 2025
    The modern arts nonprofit evolved in an ecology of growth. It's time to evolve again.
  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in