• Home
  • About
    • About this Blog
    • About Andrew Taylor
    • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

The Artful Manager

Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture

Preservation v. Protection

October 12, 2010 by Andrew Taylor

Copyright law has always walked the tightrope between monopoly and community. It was designed to allow creators, authors, and inventors to exclusively benefit from their work for a period of time (a monopoly providing incentive for them to create, author, or invent), while also ensuring the public/community benefit of those creations by eventually terminating that monopoly and releasing them to the wild.

There are books and speeches and diatribes aplenty about whether the current balance of copyright tilts toward monopoly or community (with general consensus around the monopoly). But either way, arts, culture, and heritage organizations invariably find themselves smack-dab in the middle of the circus. We are, after all, in the business of both generating creative and technical invention and also ensuring broad and generational access to those creations. We are simultaneously ”the masses” and ”the man.”
The Library of Congress commissioned a thorough and rather disturbing perspective on this tension in the recent report The State of Recorded Sound Preservation in the United States: A National Legacy at Risk in the Digital Age (available in print or PDF, and discussed by both OSNews and BoingBoing). The report suggests that under current copyright law, any individual or organization committed to preserving recorded sound for public access must essentially break the law to do so.
Were copyright law followed to the letter, little audio preservation would be undertaken. Were the law strictly enforced, it would brand virtually all audio preservation as illegal.
As a result, organizations like libraries, universities, and others do their work as best they can, and hope to ‘fly under the radar’ as they do. Also as a result, much or most of the recorded heritage of the United States is preserved by commercial interests for its current or future financial value rather than its scholarly or cultural significance.
Many passionate people have been ringing this bell for long while now — Larry Lessig, Bill Ivey, among others. It’s both gratifying and terrifying to have our national archive ring it too.

Filed Under: main

About Andrew Taylor

Andrew Taylor is a faculty member in American University's Arts Management Program in Washington, DC. [Read More …]

ArtsManaged Field Notes

#ArtsManaged logoAndrew Taylor also publishes a weekly email newsletter, ArtsManaged Field Notes, on Arts Management practice. The most recent notes are listed below.

RSS ArtsManaged Field Notes

  • Connection, concern, and capacity June 17, 2025
    The three-legged stool of fundraising strategy.
  • Is your workplace a pyramid or a wheel? June 10, 2025
    Johan Galtung defined two structures for collective action: thin-and-big (the pyramid) or thick-and-small (the wheel). Which describes your workplace?
  • Flip the script on your money narrative June 3, 2025
    Your income statement tells the tale of how (and why) money drives your business. Don't share the wrong story.
  • The sneaky surprise of new arts buildings May 27, 2025
    That shiny new arts facility is full of promise and potential, but also unexpected and unrelenting expense.
  • The one and the many of board service May 20, 2025
    How do nonprofit boards balance individual impulse with collective resolve?

Artful Manager: The Book!

The Artful Manager BookFifty provocations, inquiries, and insights on the business of arts and culture, available in
paperback, Kindle, or Apple Books formats.

Recent Comments

  • Barry Hessenius on Business in service of beauty: “An enormous loss. Diane changed the discourse on culture – its aspirations, its modus operandi, its assumptions. A brilliant thought…” Jan 19, 18:58
  • Sunil Iyengar on Business in service of beauty: “Thank you, Andrew. The loss is immense. Back when Diane was teaching a course called “Approaching Beauty,” to business majors…” Jan 16, 18:36
  • Michael J Rushton on Business in service of beauty: “A wonderful person and a creative thinker, this is a terrible loss. – thank you for posting this.” Jan 16, 13:18
  • Andrew Taylor on Two goals to rule them all: “Absolutely, borrow and build to your heart’s content! The idea that cultural practice BOTH reduces and samples surprise is really…” Jun 2, 18:01
  • Heather Good on Two goals to rule them all: “To “actively sample novel experiences (in safe ways) to build more resilient perception and prediction” is about as useful a…” Jun 2, 15:05

Archives

Creative Commons License
The written content of this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Images are not covered under this license, but are linked (whenever possible) to their original author.

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in