• Home
  • About
    • Chloe Veltman
    • lies like truth
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

lies like truth

Chloe Veltman: how culture will save the world

Should news organizations foster greater transparency about their arts coverage?

January 5, 2014 by Chloe Veltman

photoI am conducting a small but important piece of research in order to find out how members of the arts community feel about how media organizations go about deciding what arts stories to cover.
Here is the link to the survey:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/YJPVXNW
The aim is to discover how people in the arts view the typically secretive internal processes that go on at media organizations when it comes to deciding what arts stories deserve coverage and to what extent there might be an advantage to being more open about editorial views and processes.
I plan to use the survey results to help make important decisions about the editorial strategy at Colorado Public Radio, where I am in the process of launching a new arts bureau.
To that end, I am asking many Colorado culture workers to spend five minutes of their day answering eight multiple choice questions — most of which require a straight ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer.
I would greatly welcome additional input on these questions from the ArtsJournal community.
Here is the link to the survey once again:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/YJPVXNW
Please complete the survey by end of day on Friday 10 January.
Thanks for your help!
Chloe

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. william osborne says

    January 6, 2014 at 1:00 am

    This is a good idea and I wish you every success with it. Of course, most of the topics raised in the survey are much too complex to answer with a simple yes or no, but your effort to create a dialog with the arts community regarding these topics is noble and refreshing. I would answer some of the questions very differently depending on which new organization were in question. I wish the survey were more detailed and extensive. And I wonder if there should also be a “I don’t know choice.”

    So many arts groups compete for a piece of the media pie. How can one possibly decide who should be covered and who not? Sometimes editors really do have selfish, unprofessional agendas, but the bigger problem is there just isn’t enough space for all that should be covered. It would be especially beneficial if there were more local arts coverage. Maybe blogs are a part of this, even if just about everyone loves NPR and its local affiliates.

    • Chloe Veltman says

      January 6, 2014 at 1:48 pm

      thanks william for your thoughtful feedback. i think an ‘i dont know’ category would have been good to add on reflection. i did want to keep things as simple as possible at this stage of the game though. just starting my investigation…

  2. william osborne says

    January 6, 2014 at 2:07 am

    For an interesting example of carefully calculated bias in arts coverage see yesterday’s article in the NYT by the music section editor, James Oestreich, about the Vienna Philharmonic’s New Years concert:

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/01/06/arts/music/the-vienna-philharmonic-celebrates-the-new-year-twice.html?from=arts

    For years, Oestreich has been an apologist for the orchestra even though it is known for its exclusion of women and Asians. I can’t deconstruct his article here, but perhaps a few informed readers will note the facts he excludes and his calculated wording and its intentions. The Vienna Phil agreed to admit women in 1997, and admitted its first non-harpist woman only in 2007, and only because the Internet allowed people to circumvent the silence of the established arts media and report the full truth about the VPO.

    The protests raised by the Internet brought a small number of women into the orchestra, but it still the only major orchestra in the Western world that does not have a single member who is fully Asian and has an Asian family name. (About a quarter of the students at Vienna’s University of Music for the last 40 years have been Asian.) Note how Oestreich carefully rationalizes so much of the orchestra’s racist history, and how he does not mention a word about its exclusion of Asians.

  3. Merilyn Jackson says

    January 6, 2014 at 10:57 am

    I did not answer question # 4 because it does not take into account the advice given to an arts editor by her writers. That is the most determining factor — her boots on the ground, so to speak. Its the writers enthusiams, not the editor, who most influence an editor’s decisions. After all, she can’t get you to write about something you think has little value. Of course, we don’t always get our way, but we do carry a lot of weight. So your questions are not skewed correctly. Transparency is not the issue. That which is deemed review-worthy by the arts writers is most often what determines coverage, so I think the mystery surrounding editorial decisions does not rest on the editor’s shoulders alone, and the whine from the arts community about it, while understandable, is warrantless.

    • Chloe Veltman says

      January 6, 2014 at 1:52 pm

      hi merilyn
      you arise a very good point. reporters are obviously a big part of the editorial decision-making process. i am starting a bigger process here and wanted to keep things as simple as possible at this stage. thanks for completing some of the survey. please feel free to pass the link on to other people in your network.

  4. Gary Tucker says

    January 7, 2014 at 6:16 pm

    Of course every arts PR person is going to want more transparency from arts editors about their coverage, but that is not the responsibility of an arts editor or a media organization: It is to get readers/listeners/viewers. They choose to cover what they think their subscribers want to read/watch/listen to, based on the writing/reporting staff’s input. (What Merilyn Jackson said, above.) Arts coverage that gets no response is quickly going to fade away. (Which is why local TV newscasts never cover the arts: Omit the sports portion of the evening news? They’ll hear about it loud and clear. Skip a museum opening? The sound of crickets.)

    Best of luck to you with your launch of an arts bureau with CPR! However your task will be not to appease Colorado culture workers, but to develop a following among your public radio listenership.

    William Osborne is correct: There is never going to be enough air-time or column inches to cover all of the arts and culture events out there. Our wish is that we just get SOME coverage, some of the time! I don’t care how the editors reach their decision, as long as they actually choose to do something other than give more space to the latest movie grosses or celebrity marriage.

Chloe Veltman

...is the Senior Arts Editor at KQED (www.kqed.org), one of the U.S.'s most prominent public media organizations. Chloe returns to the Bay Area following two years as Arts Editor at Colorado Public Radio (www.cpr.org), where she was tapped to launch and lead the state-wide public media organization's first ever multimedia culture bureau. A former John S. Knight Journalism Fellow (2011-2012) and Humanities Center Fellow (2012-2013) at Stanford University, Chloe has contributed reporting and criticism to The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, BBC Classical Music Magazine, American Theatre Magazine, WQXR and many other media outlets. Chloe was also the host and executive producer of VoiceBox, a syndicated, weekly public radio and podcast series all about the art of the human voice (www.voicebox-media.org), which ran for four years between 2009 and 2013. Her study about the evolution of singing culture in the U.S. is forthcoming from Oxford University Press. Check out Chloe's website at www.chloeveltman.com and connect with her on Twitter via @chloeveltman. [Read More …]

lies like truth

These days, it's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between fact and fantasy. As Alan Bennett's doollally headmaster in Forty Years On astutely puts it, "What is truth and what is fable? Where is Ruth and where is Mabel?" It is one of the main tasks of this blog to celebrate the confusion through thinking about art and perhaps, on occasion, attempt to unpick the knot. [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • william osborne on When A Critic Abstains from Coverage for Ethnicity Reasons: “Several years ago you wrote a blog about African-American science fiction that was very informative. Until then I hadn’t realized…” Jun 29, 22:30
  • Kerri Hoffman on Thoughts on Public Media’s Potential Role in Podcasting: “Thanks for writing - I don't think we have enough of these conversations. As distributors to public radio stations and…” May 31, 12:59
  • william osborne on What do cactuses sound like?: “I've heard that orchestra musicians have to deal with a lot of pricks...” May 18, 00:36
  • swiss on What do cactuses sound like?: “pretty sure Renga is not about vacuous nothingness...quite the contrary” May 17, 19:43
  • Ken on Thoughts as I start a new professional chapter: “Welcome back to the Bay Area Chloe! We are lucky to have you.” May 13, 16:57

Blogroll

  • About Last Night
  • Artful Manager
  • Audience Wanted
  • Bitter Lemons
  • blog riley
  • Clyde Fitch Report
  • Cool As Hell Theatre
  • Cultural Weekly
  • Dewey 21C
  • diacritical
  • Did He Like It?
  • Engaging Matters
  • Guardian Theatre Blog
  • Independent Theater Bloggers Association
  • Josh Kornbluth
  • Jumper
  • Lies Like Truth
  • Life's a Pitch
  • Mind the Gap
  • New Beans
  • Oakland Theater Examiner
  • Producer's Perspective
  • Real Clear Arts
  • San Francisco Classical Voice
  • Speaker
  • State of the Art
  • Straight Up
  • Superfluities
  • Texas, a Concept
  • Theater Dogs
  • Theatre Bay Area's Chatterbox
  • Theatreforte
  • Thompson's Bank of Communicable Desire
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2019 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in