an blog | AJBlog Central | Contact me | Advertise | Follow me:

Too Much Vocal Varnish in “Glee”

When Glee premiered a couple of years ago, I was the Fox TV series’ biggest fan. I watched the first couple of series avidly, and then my viewing dropped off. I got busy. And I just didn’t feel like making space in my schedule for the show, which was starting to bother me for the auto-tuned quality of the singing.

I’ve checked in with “Glee” a couple of times since then. An episode that aired a while back featuring Gwyneth Paltrow as a substitute teacher was fantastic in terms of the show-stopping musical numbers, strong characters and witty dialogue. I was so immersed in the story-telling that I didn’t mind the fact that the voices were so bland.

But a less compelling episode set amid the National Show Choir Finals in Manhattan which I viewed last night made me realize that the series is really doing its musical numbers — and the upsurge of interest in ensemble singing in general created as a result of the program’s popularity — a disservice by featuring such varnished, unnatural voices.

The auto-tuning has got to stop. Everyone sounds the same. The voices are boring. Every nuance is flattened out into a homogenous beveled sound which lacks any kind of grain or distinguishing timbre.

I think hearing singing like this might also undermine the confidence of young singers who are inspired to develop their voices as a result of watching “Glee.” Singing with the glassy perfection of the vocalists on the series simply isn’t possible without the aid of digital enhancement. And if people realize that they can’t get the same tone no matter how hard they try, they may be put off from continuing on their singing path.

I hope that this blog post reaches “Glee’s” producers and they do something to make the voices sound more individual and less canned.

P.S. Another kvetch for this Tuesday morning: I caught the Joe Goode Performance Group’s‘s latest show, “The Rambler,” at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts at the weekend. I would normally dedicate a full blog post to talking about Goode’s work, which I usually find visually and sonically compelling for its powerful mixture of speech, song, lights, costumes, expressive movement and bittersweet humor. But I really don’t have much to say about “The Rambler” except that it rambled. I have no idea what the show was about to be honest and there were so many ideas recycled from previous Goode productions that I found myself feeling like I was listening to Samuel Beckett’s Krapp going over and over and over his last tape.

Comments

  1. Robbie says:

    I think hearing singing like this might also undermine the confidence of young singers [....] Singing with the glassy perfection of the vocalists on the series simply isn’t possible without the aid of digital enhancement. And if people realize that they can’t get the same tone no matter how hard they try, they may be put off from continuing on their singing path.

    Exactly! This isn’t exclusive to Glee, but one device the show uses to illustrate “bad” performance is to use the sound recorded on location, as opposed to a studio-manicured backing track. Using untreated recordings is code for “fail”.

    That said, I admire what Glee has done: it exposes a (relatively) wide range of music to a mainstream network audience.

  2. Kent says:

    I agree that the use of auto-tune on Glee is annoying on an aesthetic level. As a friend to several of the cast members, I know that they don’t need to rely on the use of auto-tune, they are excellent singers across many genres and have powerful voices. It has so disturbed me that I asked one of the cast members why the producers did it and how they felt about it. The answer is quite simple: in order to get radio play, the songs need to be produced to sound like other songs on the radio. Most pop singers today use auto-tune, whether they need to or not, so it has become a part of the contemporary sound. Hopefully some day we will come to think of auto-tuning as antiquated, much the way that some guitar effects place a song in a specific time and place. Until that time, I guess we are stuck with processed voices.

  3. Andy Thomas says:

    I have to agree. It’s much like using a perfect quantize rate on rhythm tracks, which makes the drum tracks soooo damn perfect, that there isn’t any human feel left. Why waste the drummer’s time. Leave it alone and if you can’t pitch or keep the timing as close to perfect as is humanly possible (not to say that the Glee cast can’t) then keep practicing. I would far rather hear the few human imperfections here and there, making it believable. Sad…very sad :-(

  4. nightowl says:

    I agree. I also think there’s been far too much singing in each episode recently as opposed to storytelling. Sometimes it feels like we’ve barely taken a breath before there’s another song. I know they need to sell soundtracks here and there but they’re going to lose fans if the story barely progresses and is dragged along by cheap gimmicks. If you don’t believe me, watch an episode from season one and then another from season three right after.

Speak Your Mind

*