They Died in Gaza

Lizzy Ratner said she was in "triage mode" finishing up an article, and could she answer my question in "two or three days?" The question was, what prompted her to co-edit THE GOLDSTONE REPORT: The Legacy of the Landmark Investigation of the Gaza Conflict? It was just published by Nation Books.

She hasn't got back to me yet. But she doesn't have to. She already answered the question in her article, "Two Years After Gaza." It's a stunner:

In January 2009, during a lull in the bombing of Israel's "Cast Lead" operation against Gaza, I spoke by telephone with an old family friend, Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish, from his home on Gaza's Salah al-Din Street. In a voice etched with panic, he told me about his family's dwindling water supply, his children's terror, his dream of escaping. He asked if I could help find a way for him and his family to leave the Gaza Strip. I made some genuine efforts to solicit help from friends with more connections than I, people who might actually be able to do something, but it pains me to this day that I did not do more. The next time we spoke, it was about the death of his three daughters.

The article continues:

On January 16, 2009, three of Dr. Abuelaish's eight children--Bessan, 21, Mayar, 15, and Aya, 14--were killed when Israeli soldiers trained the nozzle of their tank on the Abuelaish house and fired. Twice. The blasts killed all three girls immediately, as well as their cousin Noor, and it wounded their sister, Shatha, another cousin and an uncle. Dr. Abuelaish himself was unharmed, but in a harrowing turn of events that is now well and painfully known, he phoned Israeli newscaster Shlomi Eldar and, in a frantic tangle of Hebrew and Arabic, begged for help on Israel's nightly news. "Oh God, oh my God, my daughters have been killed. They've killed my children," he cried. "Could somebody please come to us?" The phone call, which was broadcast live throughout Israel, sounds like a shriek out of hell. It is almost impossible to listen to.

In the wake of this tragedy, Dr. Abuelaish, a well-known peace activist, remained resolutely, even stubbornly, committed to reconciliation and understanding. He did not want revenge. He just wanted accountability. "They were my beloved girls, very beautiful, very kind. Why were they killed?" he asked in a phone conversation shortly after his daughters' deaths. "I don't ask for anything, just [for the Israeli military] to admit and say sorry."

"Take responsibility," he begged.

One of the beautiful things about Lizzy Ratner, apart from her terrific writing and reporting, is her own sense of responsibility. Despite what Alan Dershowitz claims, she and her co-editors -- Philip Weiss and Adam Horowitz -- have made a huge effort to contextualize the Goldstone Report in their edited version as, in the publisher's words, "a corrective to the relentless attacks" on the original.


The book includes essays by Archbishop Desmond Tutu; human rights activist Raji Sourani; legal expert Jules Lobel; Israeli philosopher Moshe Halbertal; historians Rashid Khalidi and Jerome Slater; congressman Brian Baird; policy analyst Henry Siegman; authors Ali Abunimah, Naomi Klein, and Letty Cottin Pogrebin; and journalists Noam Sheizaf and Leila El-Haddad.

The original U.N. mission, headed by Richard Goldstone, caused enormous controversy -- and still does -- because it emphasized atrocities by the Israeli military in a bombing campaign, which had the stated aim of ending rocket attacks into Israel by Hamas and other Palestinian factions, but which was described in the report as a "deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate, and terrorize a civilian population."

Although both sides -- the Palestinians, mainly Hamas fighters, and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) -- violated international humanitarian law, it was the Israelis who were culpable of massively greater crimes, according to the report. The IDF deliberately targeted unarmed civilians; purposely destroyed critical infrastructure in Gaza, razing large areas to the ground; and used weapons, such as incendiary white phosphorous in highly populated areas, that were beyond reprehensible.

Amnesty International issued its own detailed report in 2009 (available for free download as a pdf). Here, according to that report, is an example of what happened when "three white phosphorous artillery shells crashed through the roof of Sabah Abu Halima's home":

"Everything caught fire. My husband and four of my children burned alive in front of my eyes; my baby girl, Shahed, my only girl, melted in my arms. How can a mother have to see her children burn alive? I couldn't save them, I couldn't help them. I was on fire. Now I am still burning all over, I am in pain day and night; I am suffering terribly." [Italics in the original.]

Postscript: Just discovered this -- Lizzy Ratner talks about the book in a video interview. (The video report, which also includes an interview with Palestinian journalist and author Laila El-Haddad, begins at 10:38 on the track).

PPS: Jan. 26 -- In re the leaked documents of the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, a new truth dawns on the Arab world.

April 4 -- The Goldstone Bombshell

In a column in The Washington Post, Goldstone has withdrawn the report's most-damning conclusion about the Israeli military campaign in Gaza. He writes that, contrary to the allegations of Israeli war crimes, it was not the policy of the IDF to deliberately target unarmed civilians.

The allegations of intentionality by Israel were based on the deaths of and injuries to civilians in situations where our fact-finding mission had no evidence on which to draw any other reasonable conclusion. While the investigations published by the Israeli military and recognized in the U.N. committee's report have established the validity of some incidents that we investigated in cases involving individual soldiers, they also indicate that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy. [boldface added -- JH]

Goldstone's reversal is more nuanced than critics like Jeffrey Goldberg are claiming. And it is not the blanket moral vindication that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says it is, despite its praise for Israel's examination of the alleged atrocities.

But there is no denying that it's a huge boost for Israel especially in the propaganda war with Hamas, which came in for sharp criticism in Goldstone's column:

The final report by the U.N. committee of independent experts -- chaired by former New York judge Mary McGowan Davis -- that followed up on the recommendations of the Goldstone Report has found that "Israel has dedicated significant resources to investigate over 400 allegations of operational misconduct in Gaza" while "the de facto authorities (i.e., Hamas) have not conducted any investigations into the launching of rocket and mortar attacks against Israel."

. . .

Some have charged that the process we followed did not live up to judicial standards. To be clear: Our mission was in no way a judicial or even quasi-judicial proceeding. We did not investigate criminal conduct on the part of any individual in Israel, Gaza or the West Bank. We made our recommendations based on the record before us, which unfortunately did not include any evidence provided by the Israeli government. Indeed, our main recommendation was for each party to investigate, transparently and in good faith, the incidents referred to in our report. McGowan Davis has found that Israel has done this to a significant degree; Hamas has done nothing.

Goldstone adds further that while it might have been "absurd to expect Hamas, an organization that has a policy to destroy the state of Israel, to investigate what we said were serious war crimes. It was my hope, even if unrealistic, that Hamas would do so, especially if Israel conducted its own investigations."

At minimum I hoped that in the face of a clear finding that its members were committing serious war crimes, Hamas would curtail its attacks. Sadly, that has not been the case. Hundreds more rockets and mortar rounds have been directed at civilian targets in southern Israel. That comparatively few Israelis have been killed by the unlawful rocket and mortar attacks from Gaza in no way minimizes the criminality. The U.N. Human Rights Council should condemn these heinous acts in the strongest terms.
January 24, 2011 12:23 PM | | Comments (2)

2 Comments

Something is missing here--Hamas fires hundreds of missles into Israel--causing terror to hundreds of thousands of people. I know, my wife was with me in Ashdod last summer during one such attack and she still has not recovered--and that was after a "mere" 4 attacks. Israeli's have been subjected to thousands of these attacks. Then Israel's response is "disproportionate". On the contrary, let me remind you that England firebombed Dresden and killed 150,000 people in one night and the US killed an equal number at Hiromshima and Nagasaki. In reality, the Israeli reponse was too little too late, as the rocket fire continues. Israel faced a similar dilemna in the 1950s with attacks from Jordan. One mission in which Israel wiped out an entire Jordanian military base and magic--no attacks for the next 10 years. Israel needs to wake up and respond with massive attack.

As a Jew (technically and culturally), I am proud of Jews who carry on the great tradition of speaking truth to power.

Thank you Jan and props to Lizzy, et al.

Leave a comment

Me Elsewhere

'WILD SIDE' STILL ROCKS 

Nelson Algren was one of the great American authors of the 20th century, it is no exaggeration to say, and among the most neglected. Consider his underrated classic, "A Walk on the Wild Side." The title -- popularized and co-opted as an idiomatic phrase by Hollywood and Madison Avenue (institutions Algren loathed) -- is familiar to most anyone who speaks English or knows Lou Reed's lyrics. But the novel itself? Hardly.

BUSTER KEATON REVISITED 
Buster Keaton: Tempest in a Flat Hat is not a biography. "This book is merely a fan's notes," Edward McPherson writes in the introduction, although his publisher ignores the disclaimer and calls it a biography on the cover. In fact, the book is a bit of both, a difficult combination to bring off unless you're David Thomson, who set the standard with Rosebud, his penetrating rumination on the life and career of Orson Welles, which was nothing if not a distillation of every obsessive thought he ever had about the myth and the man and all his movies.
LAUREN BACALL, STILL SALTY AT 80 
When Lauren Bacall writes that her singing voice ranges "somewhere between B minus sharp and outer space," she's being candid and funny. It's not every stage star with two Tony Awards for best actress in a musical whose vocal talent offers so little promise. (OK, Harvey Fierstein excepted.) Still less would one admit it.
THE STARS ACCORDING TO BOGDANOVICH 
Peter Bogdanovich's superb collection of movie-star profiles and interviews -- a sequel to Who the Devil Made It, his interviews of top film directors -- begins with an affectionate tale about Orson Welles that reminds us just how intimate the author's connection to Hollywood's greatest has been. But contrary to what we've come to expect from dime-a-dozen celebrities and celebrity interviews not worth two cents, the tale avoids bromidic egotism and journalistic platitudes.
SAMMY'S WHITE DREAMS 
Four decades ago Lenny Bruce sentenced Sammy Davis Jr. to "30 years in Biloxi," stripping him of "his Jewish star" and "his religious statue of Elizabeth Taylor." Now we have two new biographies of Davis that spring him from ridicule, if not from doubts about his legacy, and restore a measure of dignity to a black entertainer whose huge fame and success never overcame his devout wish -- indeed his lifelong effort -- to be white.
more picks

Sites to See

Abstract City
AmericaBlog
American Leftist
Andante
Antiwar.com
ArkivMusic.com
Articulate
Arts & Letters Daily

Blogcritics
Booknotes
Bright Lights Film Journal
Buck Fush

C-SPAN
Center for Cooperative Research
Noam Chomsky
Consortium News

Cost of War in Iraq
Council on Foreign Relations
Crooks and Liars
Cultural Weekly
TheCuttingFloor

The Daily Howler
David E's Fablog
Dark Roasted Blend
Democracy Now!
Devil Ducky

Editor's Cut
Ehrensteinland
Tim Ellis: Comedy
Eschaton

Film Threat
Robert Fisk
Fluxlist Europe

Glenn Greenwald
Good Reads

The Guardian (London)
GUERNICA: A Magazine of Art & Politics

Herman (Literary) Archive, Northwestern Univ. Library
The Huffington Post

Inter Press Service News Agency
International Relations Center
Internet Movie Database (IMDb)
Doug Ireland

Jacketmagazine
Clive James

Henry Kisor
Krugman's Blog:
Conscience of a Liberal

Lannan Foundation
Life During Wartime
Los Angeles Times
Low Culture

Metacritic
Mimeo Mimeo
Museum of Television & Radio

Nat. Arts Journalism Program
National Security Archive
The New York Times
NO!art

Onion Radio News
Open City
Open Library
Osborne & Conant

The Overgrown Path

Greg Palast
Political Irony

Postclassic Radio

Poynter/Romenesko:
Media People

Rain Taxi
The Raw Story
RealityStudio.org
Bill Reed
The Reeler
Rhizome
Rwanda Project

Salon
Seeing Black
Senses of Cinema
Seven Stories Press
Slate
Studs Terkel

TalkLeft
The Theater Times (Cris Gross)
The 3rd Page
ThugLit: Writing About Wrongs
Times Square Cam
The Tin Man
Truthdig
t r u t h o u t

Ubu Web
Underneath Their Robes

Wading in the Velvet Sea
Walking Man
The Wall Street Journal
Wikigate
Wikipedia

The Washington Post
James Wolcott
World O'Crap Man

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Straight Up | published on January 24, 2011 12:23 PM.

The Difference between Decency and Civility? was the previous entry in this blog.

The Wyler Touch is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.