Barbara Ehrenreich Does It Again

Just as she did last month, she has published the best op-ed read of the day, this time with an assist from Dedrick Muhammad.

Their lede asks, "What do you get when you combine the worst economic downturn since the Depression with the first black president?" And answers:

A surge of white racial resentment, loosely disguised as a populist revolt. An article on the Fox News Web site has put forth the theory that health reform is a stealth version of reparations for slavery: whites will foot the bill and, by some undisclosed mechanism, blacks will get all the care. President Obama, in such fantasies, is a dictator and, in one image circulated among the anti-tax, anti-health reform "tea parties," he is depicted as a befeathered African witch doctor with little tusks coming out of his nostrils.

For the next 1,600-plus words, with one example after another, they illustrate and prove what the headline calls The Recession's Racial Divide. And they draw the appropriately grim conclusion that "despite the right-wing perception of black power grabs, this recession is on track to leave blacks even more economically disadvantaged than they were." Noting emphatically:

Does a black president who is inclined toward bipartisanship dare address this destruction of the black middle class? Probably not. But if Americans of all races don't get some economic relief soon, the pain will only increase and with it, perversely, the unfounded sense of white racial grievance.

Give Ehrenreich this year's Pulitzer for Commentary already. She oughta win hands down.

(Crossposted at HuffPo)

Postscript: Bill Osborne responds:

Very interesting blog, but it might leave the impression that all critics of Obama (or the larger systemic problems of our government) are racists.

Going back to the Shay's Rebellion thread you addressed a few weeks ago, we might remember Madison's comments during the constitutional debates:

In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. ... If these observations be just, our [own] government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests, and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. [emphasis added]

Chomsky takes this idea and asserts that America is not a democracy and that it was never intended to be. He says we live in a Polyarchy. Just before the midterm elections of 2006, he gave his arguments, which are really worth a listen. They still apply.

Bush pushed Polyarchy to its extreme in favor of the opulent, and a huge amount of the population lost faith in the government. Obama has become the perfect alibi for rebuilding trust in Polyarchy. On one hand, his race is a basis for rightwing hatred; on the other, it is is used to mollify moderates and the left, making them think that the basis of our economic injustices have significantly changed, when in reality they haven't. Both sides of this equation are forms of racial exploitation. Is one worse than the other?

Observations like these about race are close to being a taboo topic, so it isn't discussed. This makes the exploitation of Obama's race an even more effective tool as a propaganda instrument.

As always, one is struck by the ingeniousness of our powerful elite in politics, media, and finance. The exploitation of race has become far more subtle and sophisticated.

After the 2008 presidential election, Chomsky detailed some of his criticisms of the Obama administration:

One sees the nature of a one-party state with its two factions, repubs and dems. Too bad this must all seem so radical when it's really mostly just rational observation.

Please don't be fooled.

September 13, 2009 9:50 AM | | Comments (0)

Leave a comment

Me Elsewhere

'WILD SIDE' STILL ROCKS 

Nelson Algren was one of the great American authors of the 20th century, it is no exaggeration to say, and among the most neglected. Consider his underrated classic, "A Walk on the Wild Side." The title -- popularized and co-opted as an idiomatic phrase by Hollywood and Madison Avenue (institutions Algren loathed) -- is familiar to most anyone who speaks English or knows Lou Reed's lyrics. But the novel itself? Hardly.

BUSTER KEATON REVISITED 
Buster Keaton: Tempest in a Flat Hat is not a biography. "This book is merely a fan's notes," Edward McPherson writes in the introduction, although his publisher ignores the disclaimer and calls it a biography on the cover. In fact, the book is a bit of both, a difficult combination to bring off unless you're David Thomson, who set the standard with Rosebud, his penetrating rumination on the life and career of Orson Welles, which was nothing if not a distillation of every obsessive thought he ever had about the myth and the man and all his movies.
LAUREN BACALL, STILL SALTY AT 80 
When Lauren Bacall writes that her singing voice ranges "somewhere between B minus sharp and outer space," she's being candid and funny. It's not every stage star with two Tony Awards for best actress in a musical whose vocal talent offers so little promise. (OK, Harvey Fierstein excepted.) Still less would one admit it.
THE STARS ACCORDING TO BOGDANOVICH 
Peter Bogdanovich's superb collection of movie-star profiles and interviews -- a sequel to Who the Devil Made It, his interviews of top film directors -- begins with an affectionate tale about Orson Welles that reminds us just how intimate the author's connection to Hollywood's greatest has been. But contrary to what we've come to expect from dime-a-dozen celebrities and celebrity interviews not worth two cents, the tale avoids bromidic egotism and journalistic platitudes.
SAMMY'S WHITE DREAMS 
Four decades ago Lenny Bruce sentenced Sammy Davis Jr. to "30 years in Biloxi," stripping him of "his Jewish star" and "his religious statue of Elizabeth Taylor." Now we have two new biographies of Davis that spring him from ridicule, if not from doubts about his legacy, and restore a measure of dignity to a black entertainer whose huge fame and success never overcame his devout wish -- indeed his lifelong effort -- to be white.
more picks

Sites to See

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Straight Up | published on September 13, 2009 9:50 AM.

That Google Book Settlement was the previous entry in this blog.

Hail to the Judge is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.