• Home
  • About
    • Straight Up
    • Jan Herman
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Straight Up | Jan Herman

Arts, Media & Culture News with 'tude

READING VAN CREVELD

December 7, 2005 by Jan Herman

A mathematician we know, who evaluates weapons systems for the U.S. military, sent us a message about a recent article in the Forward by military historian Martin Van Creveld, who is described as “the only non-American author on the U.S. Army’s required reading list for officers.” Even though the article has been widely quoted elsewhere, particularly the sensational conclusion, we have to flag it. Its freshness is still evident from Howard Dean’s latest remarks. (See below.)
Our friend writes: “Two of Van Creveld’s incidental observations seem especially worth noting. The first relates to what the Revolution in Military Affairs has accomplished”:

Whether that revolution [RMA] has contributed to anything besides America’s national debt is open to debate. What is beyond question, though, is that the new weapons are so few and so expensive that even the world’s largest and richest power can afford only to field a relative handful of them.[Emphasis added.]

“The second relates to what the ‘wise old heads,’ who were to keep George Bush out of serious trouble (as the spin machines and their media echo chambers sang across the country), have accomplished”:

For misleading the American people, and launching the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 B.C sent his legions into Germany and lost them, Bush deserves to be impeached
[emphasis added] and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial along with the rest of the president’s men. If convicted, they’ll have plenty of time to mull over their sins.

Subtitle: 'The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict since Clausewitz Van Creveld’s article ran in the Forward on Nov. 25. What popped up yesterday in The New York Times? Bingo! An article headlined “White House Tries to Trim Military Cost,” which states: “While there have been periodic attempts recently to hold the line on some costly weapons, this is the first serious threat to the next-generation weapons that military contractors have been developing for years.”
As long as we’re citing Van Creveld, here’s another piece of his from a year ago, “Why Iraq Will End as Vietnam Did.” Most of it details at great length what the Israeli general-turned-politician Moshe Dayan learned from his experience in Vietnam as a war correspondent for the Israeli newspaper Maariv. But Van Creveld’s prediction of the outcome in Iraq is most striking:

[A]n armed force that keeps beating down on a weaker opponent will be seen as committing a series of crimes; therefore it will end up by losing the support of its allies, its own people, and its own troops. Depending on the quality of the forces — whether they are draftees or professionals, the effectiveness of the propaganda machine, the nature of the political process, and so on — things may happen quickly or take a long time to mature. However, the outcome is always the same. He (or she) who does not understand this does not understand anything about war; or, indeed, human nature.
In other words, he who fights against the weak — and the rag-tag Iraqi militias are very weak indeed — and loses, loses. He who fights against the weak and wins also loses. To kill an opponent who is much weaker than yourself is unnecessary and therefore cruel; to let that opponent kill you is unnecessary and therefore foolish. As Vietnam and countless other cases prove, no armed force however rich, however powerful, however, advanced, and however well motivated is immune to this dilemma. The end result is always disintegration and defeat. … That is why the present adventure will almost certainly end as the previous one did. Namely, with the last US troops fleeing the country while hanging on to their helicopters’ skids.

If you don’t believe that, well, how about a taste of what an old friend of ours calls more Rice Krispies. Or her latest breakfast cereal, Rice Pablum. Then you can wash it down with plenty more bullshit.
We know what Howard Dean believes, and we’d bet we know what he’s been reading. In a radio interview in San Antonio on Monday, he said: “The idea that we’re going to win this war is an idea that unfortunately is just plain wrong.” He said: “I remember going through this in Vietnam, and everybody kept saying, ‘Oh, just another year. Yeah, we’re gonna have a victory.’ Well, we didn’t have a victory then. And it cost us 25,000 more troops because people were too stubborn to be truthful about what was happening.”
— Tireless Staff of Thousands

Share on email
Email
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit

Filed Under: main

Jan Herman

When not listening to Bach or Cuban jazz pianist Chucho Valdes, or dancing to salsa, I like to play jazz piano -- but only in the privacy of my own mind.
Another strange fact... Read More…

About

My Books

Several books of poems have been published in recent years by Moloko Print, Statdlichter Presse, Phantom Outlaw Editions, and Cold Turkey … [Read More...]

Straight Up

The agenda is just what it says: news of arts, media & culture delivered with attitude. Or as Rock Hudson once said in a movie: "Man is the only … [Read More...]

Contact me

We're cutting down on spam. Please fill in this form. … [Read More...]

Archives

Blogroll

Abstract City
AC Institute
ACKER AWARDS New York
All Things Allen Ginsberg
Antiwar.com
arkivmusic.com
Artbook&
Arts & Letters Daily

Befunky
Bellaart
Blogcritics
Booknotes
Bright Lights Film Journal

C-SPAN
Noam Chomsky
Consortium News
Cost of War
Council on Foreign Relations
Crooks and Liars
Cultural Daily

The Daily Howler
Dark Roasted Blend
DCReport
Deep L
Democracy Now!

Tim Ellis: Comedy
Eschaton

Film Threat
Robert Fisk
Flixnosh (David Elliott’s movie menu)
Fluxlist Europe

Good Reads
The Guardian
GUERNICA: A Magazine of Art & Politics

Herman (Literary) Archive, Northwestern Univ. Library
The Huffington Post

Inter Press Service News Agency
The Intercept
Internet Archive (WayBackMachine)
Internet Movie Database (IMDb)
Doug Ireland
IT: International Times, The Magazine of Resistance

Jacketmagazine
Clive James

Kanopy (stream free movies, via participating library or university)
Henry Kisor
Paul Krugman

Lannan Foundation
Los Angeles Times

Metacritic
Mimeo Mimeo
Moloko Print
Movie Geeks United (MGU)
MGU: The Kubrick Series

National Security Archive
The New York Times
NO!art

Osborne & Conant
The Overgrown Path

Poets House
Political Irony
Poynter

Quanta Magazine

Rain Taxi
The Raw Story
RealityStudio.org
Bill Reed
Rhizome
Rwanda Project

Salon
Senses of Cinema
Seven Stories Press
Slate
Stadtlichter Presse
Studs Terkel
The Synergic Theater

Talking Points Memo (TPM)
TalkLeft
The 3rd Page
Third Mind Books
Times Square Cam
The Tin Man
t r u t h o u t

Ubu Web

Vox

The Wall Street Journal
Wikigate
Wikipedia
The Washington Post
The Wayback Machine (Internet Archive)
World Catalogue
World Newspapers, Magazines & News Sites

The XD Agency

Share on email
Email
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit
This blog published under a Creative Commons license

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in