• Home
  • About
    • Straight Up
    • Jan Herman
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Straight Up | Herman

Arts, Media & Culture News with 'tude

FISK ON THE JOURNALISTAS

December 28, 2005 by Jan Herman

“Fisk scolds U.S. journalists” is the way Romenesko sums up “Telling it like it isn’t,” an op-ed tongue-lashing in yesterday’s Los Angeles Times (which was fairly mild for Fisk). Now have a look at some excerpts from his book, “The Great War for Civilization,” where the journalistas come in for some really heavy-duty spanking — no punches pulled (which is more typical of him) and not limited to American scribes. Here Fisk speaks about the media’s mistreatment of the Palestinians:

[W]ho are those people? In the taboo-ridden world of Western journalism, every effort continues to be made not only to dehumanise them but to de-culture them, de-nation them, to dis-identify them. A long article by David Margolick in Vanity Fair explains Israel’s policy of “targeted killing” — the murder of Palestinians chosen by the Israelis as “security” threats — although Margolick never mentions the word “murder.” Some of Israel’s “targeted killing” operations, he says, are “dazzling.” Yet nowhere in the article is it explained where the Palestinians come from, why they are occupied — or why Jewish colonies are being built on their land. In the Mail on Sunday, Stewart Steven writes that “there is no language known as Palestinian. There is no distinct Palestinian culture. There is no specific Palestinian dress. Palestinians are indistinguishable from other Arabs.” Jerusalem, he adds, “was never visited by Mohamed.” Palestinians speak Arabic but with a distinctive Palestinian accent. There is a Palestinian culture of poetry and prose and — among women — of national dress. … It could equally be said that there is no language known as American, that American culture is of English origin, that there is no specific American dress, that Americans are indistinguishable from other Westerners. Legend, not the Koran, has it that Mohamed visited Jerusalem. Perhaps he did not. But Christians do not deny the holy nature of the Vatican or Canterbury Cathedral just because Christ never visited Italy or England.
Far more disturbing and vicious paradigms of this contempt for Palestinians regularly appear in Western newspapers. In the Irish Times, for example, Mark Steyn felt able to describe the eminently decent Hanan Ashrawi as one of a number of “bespoke terror apologists.” A visit to the West Bank in 2003, Steyn wrote, “creeped me out.” It was “a wholly diseased environment,” a “culture that glorifies depravity,” which led the author to conclude that “nothing good grows in toxic soil.”
Once the identity of Palestinians has been removed, once their lands are subject to “dispute” rather than “occupation,” once Arafat allowed the Americans and Israelis to relegate Jerusalem, settlements and the “right of return” to “final status” negotiations — and thus not to be mentioned in the meantime, for to do so would “threaten” peace — the mere hint of Palestinian resistance can be defined as “terrorism.” Inside this society there is a sickness — “disease,” “depravity,” toxic soil.” Buried in Palestinian hearts — in secret — must remain their sense of unresolved anger, frustration and resentment at a multitude of injustices.

The Great War for CivilisationFisk goes on for pages about the misuse of language and the lies it spawns. Here he talks about the inequality of descriptions when comparing Israeli and Palestinian killings. His comments bear on the meaning of “genocide,” which is especially appropriate in view of the postscript from Doug Ireland, objecting to William Osborne’s deployment of the word in yesterday’s post, WHAT’S GOIN’ ON? Ireland contended it was “sloppy use of language” because “the word has a very precise meaning, and is, unfortunately, much over-used by anti-imperialists of a certain stripe.” But listen to Fisk:

So when does a bloodbath become an atrocity? When does an atrocity become a massacre? How big does a massacre have to be before it qualifies as genocide? How many dead before a genocide becomes a holocaust? Old questions become new questions at each killing field. The Israeli journalist Arie Caspi wrote a scathing article … which caught the hypocritical response to the Jenin killings [in April 2002] with painful accuracy:

Okay, so there wasn’t a massacre. Israel only shot some children, brought a house crashing down on an old man, rained cement blocks on an invalid who couldn’t get out in time, used locals as a human shield against bombs, and prevented aid from getting to the sick and wounded. That’s really not a massacre, and there’s really no need for a commission of enquiry … whether run by ourselves or sent by the goyim.
The insanity gripping Israel seems to have moved beyond our morals … many Israelis believe that as long as we do not practice systematic mass murder, our place in heaven is secure. Every time some Palestinian or Scandinavian fool yells “Holocaust!,” we respond in an angry huff: This is a holocaust? So a few people were killed, 200, 300, some very young, some very old. Does anyone see gas chambers or crematoria?

These are not idle questions. Nor cynical. … [I]f at least two dozen Palestinian dead in Jenin was not a massacre, how should we describe the four Israelis dead at the Adora settlement? Well, the official Israeli army spokesman, Major Avner Foxman, said of the Adora killings: “For me, now I know what a massacre is. This is a massacre.” The Canadian National Post referred to the Palestinian assault as being “barbarous,” a word never used about the killing of Palestinian civilians. I don’t like the mathematics here. Four dead Israelis,including two armed settlers, is a massacre. I’ll accept this. But twenty-four Palestinian civilians killed, including a nurse and a paraplegic, is not a massacre. (I am obviously leaving aside the thirty or so armed Palestinians who were also killed in Jenin.) What does this mean? What does it tell us about journalism, about my profession? Does the definition of a bloodbath now depend on the religion or the race of the civilian dead to be qualified as a massacre? No, I didn’t call the Jenin killings a massacre. But I should have done.
Yet our responsibility does not end there. How many of our circumlocutions open the way to these attacks? How many journalists encouraged the Israelis — by their reporting or by their wilfully given, foolish advice — to undertake these brutal assaults on the Palestinians. On 31 March 2002 — just three days before the assault on Jenin — Tom Friedman wrote in The New York Times that “Israel needs to deliver a military blow that clearly shows terror will not pay.” Well, thanks, Tom, I said to myself when I read this piece of lethal journalism a few days later. The Israelis certainly followed Friedman’s advice.”

Fisk goes on like that for page after angry page. It is harrowing and bracing, both. It is why his book runs to more than a thousand pages and why it is worth the sacrifice of every tree felled to publish it. Having made it this far, you may be interested to read an interview with Fisk, where he lets it all hang out, and a dispassionately admiring review of the book — actually, a profile of Fisk as much as a review — by Phillip Knightley, author of “The First Casualty,” which explains the high value we place on Knightley’s opinion.
— Tireless Staff of Thousands

Email this to someone
email
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Reddit
Reddit

Filed Under: main

Jan Herman

When not listening to Bach or Cuban jazz pianist Chucho Valdes, or dancing to salsa, I like to play jazz piano -- but only in the privacy of my own mind.
Another strange fact... Read More…

About

Straight Up

The agenda is just what it says: news of arts, media & culture delivered with attitude. Or as Rock Hudson once said in a movie: "Man is the only … [Read More...]

Books ‘n’ Stuff

I'm the author of several books, including The Z Collection: Portraits & Sketches, just published by Blue Wind Press in a new 2018 edition. My … [Read More...]

My Checkered Career

I've been a staff writer covering arts and culture at the Los Angeles Times, a reporter and movie reviewer at The Daily News in New York, a reporter … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • william osborne on ‘Peculiar Shortcomings’

    Yes, free moments channel surfing TV in hotel rooms over 9 weeks in 23 cities. Much of the character...
    Posted Apr 23, 2018
  • Jan Herman on ‘Peculiar Shortcomings’

    Thanks for the comment. Once again an amplification that enhances the post. I can’t help thinking that you must have...
    Posted Apr 23, 2018
  • william osborne on ‘Peculiar Shortcomings’

    "At all costs we must get rid of our hypocrisies and falsehoods and see ourselves as we are..." That's...
    Posted Apr 23, 2018
  • william osborne on ‘For Sure Verboten’

    Good to see someone on AJ address this issue. Many implications for the American arts world and its plutocratic...
    Posted Apr 21, 2018
  • Gary Lee-Nova on Speaking for Myself

    A fine poem, Sir!
    Posted Mar 23, 2018
  • Gary Lee-Nova on Once Upon a Time in India . . .

    Astonishing! This publication reminds me of GNAOUA, Number One: 1964. Nice post, Jan! Thank you.
    Posted Mar 23, 2018
  • Gary Lee-Nova on Spike, Smalls, and Mezzrow

    Wow! Just Wow! The presence of the internet outlets/interfaces in relation to the bricks-and-mortar operations is quite astonishing. "Wilner..." Hmmmm......
    Posted Mar 17, 2018
  • Gary Lee-Nova on Poland Dials the Wrong Number

    William, you have posted a set of important questions. And thank you for the mention of "Wir haben es gesehen,"...
    Posted Mar 08, 2018
  • william osborne on Poland Dials the Wrong Number

    It's interesting to put this theme in the context of how the Nazis coerced people in occupied countries to participate...
    Posted Mar 01, 2018
  • Rolf Potts on R. Crumb Classic Portraits

    Love these.
    Posted Feb 28, 2018

Blogroll

(Latest Wikileaks news in real-time updates.)
Abstract City
AC Institute
All Things Allen Ginsberg
AmericaBlog
American Leftist
Antiwar.com
ArkivMusic.com
Arts & Letters Daily

Bellaart
Blogcritics
Booknotes
Bright Lights Film Journal

C-SPAN
Noam Chomsky
Consortium News
Cost of War
Council on Foreign Relations
Crooks and Liars
Cultural Weekly

The Daily Howler
David E’s Fablog
Dark Roasted Blend
DCReport
Democracy Now!
Devil Ducky

Ehrensteinland
Tim Ellis: Comedy
Eschaton

Film Threat
Robert Fisk
Flixnosh (David Elliott’s movie menu)
Fluxlist Europe

Good Reads
The Guardian (London)
GUERNICA: A Magazine of Art & Politics

Herman (Literary) Archive, Northwestern Univ. Library
The Huffington Post

Inter Press Service News Agency
The Intercept
Internet Movie Database (IMDb)
Doug Ireland
IT: International Times, The Newspaper of Resistance

Jacketmagazine
Clive James

Henry Kisor
Paul Krugman

Lannan Foundation
Life During Wartime
Los Angeles Times

Metacritic
Mimeo Mimeo
Moloko Plus

Nat. Arts Journalism Program
National Security Archive
The New York Times
NO!art

Open City
Osborne & Conant

The Overgrown Path

Political Irony
Poynter

The Quarterly Conversation

Rain Taxi
The Raw Story
RealityStudio.org
Bill Reed
The Reeler
Rhizome
Rwanda Project

Salon
Seeing Black
Senses of Cinema
Seven Stories Press
Slate
Studs Terkel
The Synergic Theater

TalkLeft
The 3rd Page
ThugLit: Writing About Wrongs
Times Square Cam
The Tin Man
t r u t h o u t

Ubu Web

Vox

The Wall Street Journal
Wikigate
Wikipedia
The Washington Post
James Wolcott
World Catalogue
World Newspapers, Magazines & News Sites

Email this to someone
email
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Reddit
Reddit
This blog published under a Creative Commons license

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2018 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in