CATCHING UP

In the rush to leave 2004 behind, I never got around to posting the conclusion of a small debate that erupted about Bill Moyers. It began with a farewell to Moyers that praised him -- he was retiring from broadcast journalism -- and continued with reader Larry Lippman's negative response, which attacked Moyers for being sanctimonious and me for adulating him, followed by Bill Osborne's reflections on the power of the mass media to create the worst of all worlds.

Lippman then messaged a response, which has not been posted. Here 'tiz:

As you know, Tom Shales in the Washington Post pointed out that a common sin of the left is piety, and it could be applied to Bill Moyers, but that "it wasn't much of a character flaw," which is true in general, but not in a journalist.

Piety has a tendency not only to close the mind, but also closes off the possibility of serious discussion or debate. "You are a fascist" tends to be a conversation stopper.

Unfortunately, this character flaw is often associated with a mental defect -- the inability to make distinctions. If intelligence consists in the mind's ability to both generalize and make distinctions the leftist mind is often half-brained.This mind has no problem in detecting similarities and making generalizations from them, but it often has trouble noticing differences.

Bill Osborne is a good example of the leftist writer's tendency to fuse piety with half-brainedness -- Nazis bad. Goebbels a Nazi. Both Limbaugh and Goebbels recognized the power of radio to influence the political landscape.Therefore Limbaugh a dangerous incipient Nazi. No, I am not worried, and I am not moving to Canada.

Happy holidays and a wonderful New Year.

I forwarded Lippman's message to Osborne for his response. Here 'tiz:

I see what Larry is trying to say. Nazi is used as a sort of hippie epithet for rednecks and the like, but I refer to German history for other reasons. After all, I have lived in Germany for the last 25 years, and have written numerous articles about the culture, including one published by the MIT Press on how Hitler manipulated the symphony orchestra for propaganda purposes. Germans and their history are a living reality for me. [Read the article. -- JH]

Starting a war with false fears about WMDs is clearly fear mongering for political purposes. It led to the extreme of war. This fear mongering was taken up by rightwing radio. Using the media this way has important historical correlations people should carefully consider.

I think it is a little superficial to try to discredit Moyers as pious. It sounds like Larry is being made a little uncomfortable by what he said. He can't attack the substance, so he attacks a presumed style. And that is to say nothing of the fact that the right's political base is Christian fundamentalists. What is more pious than a president who literally mimics the rhetorical style of Southern fundamentalists, and who wants to turn over many government programs to faith-based initiatives?

Larry is overlooking a few things. I wish someone could find a way to help these folks see how they come off. Maybe they would would become a little more moderate.

January 10, 2005 9:34 AM |

Categories:

Me Elsewhere

'WILD SIDE' STILL ROCKS 

Nelson Algren was one of the great American authors of the 20th century, it is no exaggeration to say, and among the most neglected. Consider his underrated classic, "A Walk on the Wild Side." The title -- popularized and co-opted as an idiomatic phrase by Hollywood and Madison Avenue (institutions Algren loathed) -- is familiar to most anyone who speaks English or knows Lou Reed's lyrics. But the novel itself? Hardly.

BUSTER KEATON REVISITED 
Buster Keaton: Tempest in a Flat Hat is not a biography. "This book is merely a fan's notes," Edward McPherson writes in the introduction, although his publisher ignores the disclaimer and calls it a biography on the cover. In fact, the book is a bit of both, a difficult combination to bring off unless you're David Thomson, who set the standard with Rosebud, his penetrating rumination on the life and career of Orson Welles, which was nothing if not a distillation of every obsessive thought he ever had about the myth and the man and all his movies.
LAUREN BACALL, STILL SALTY AT 80 
When Lauren Bacall writes that her singing voice ranges "somewhere between B minus sharp and outer space," she's being candid and funny. It's not every stage star with two Tony Awards for best actress in a musical whose vocal talent offers so little promise. (OK, Harvey Fierstein excepted.) Still less would one admit it.
THE STARS ACCORDING TO BOGDANOVICH 
Peter Bogdanovich's superb collection of movie-star profiles and interviews -- a sequel to Who the Devil Made It, his interviews of top film directors -- begins with an affectionate tale about Orson Welles that reminds us just how intimate the author's connection to Hollywood's greatest has been. But contrary to what we've come to expect from dime-a-dozen celebrities and celebrity interviews not worth two cents, the tale avoids bromidic egotism and journalistic platitudes.
SAMMY'S WHITE DREAMS 
Four decades ago Lenny Bruce sentenced Sammy Davis Jr. to "30 years in Biloxi," stripping him of "his Jewish star" and "his religious statue of Elizabeth Taylor." Now we have two new biographies of Davis that spring him from ridicule, if not from doubts about his legacy, and restore a measure of dignity to a black entertainer whose huge fame and success never overcame his devout wish -- indeed his lifelong effort -- to be white.
more picks

Sites to See

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by CriticalMASS published on January 10, 2005 9:34 AM.

TORTURED TESTIMONY was the previous entry in this blog.

SALVADOR IN IRAQ? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.