• Home
  • About
    • Straight Up
    • Jan Herman
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Straight Up | Jan Herman

Arts, Media & Culture News with 'tude

READING THE TEA LEAVES

October 6, 2004 by cmackie

Will voters ever get to see what those guys were scribbling so furiously on their
notepads? Our guess is Mr. Sourpuss was doodling his Republican mantra, “significant
progress,” and reminding himself not to curl his lip or spit too much venom.


Although he was aiming for gravitas (that much overused word), he managed instead
to throw a “modulated tantrum,” Tom Shales writes, in a debate
that “was like a tea party for pitbulls.”


Our guess is Mr. Smiley was doodling his Democratic counter-mantra, “four more years of
the same,” and notes to himself not to smile too much, which he succeeded in doing, as though
that might prove he had the kind of gravitas (much overused word) to qualify him for the
second-highest office in the land without resorting to a dyspeptic demeanor or snide remarks.


In fact, he succeeded in not being just a pretty boy. He put Mr. Sourpuss on the defensive
and kept the pressure on right from the start: “Mr. Vice President, you are still not being straight
with the American people,” he said, then rounded on him:


I mean the reality you and George Bush continue to tell people, first, that
things are going well in Iraq. [WHAM!] The American people don’t need us to explain this
to them. [BAM!] They see it on their television every single day. [THANK YOU,
MA’AM!]


What was Mr. Sourpuss’s comeback?



We’ve made significant progress in Iraq. [LAME!] We’ve stood up a new
government … But the point of success in Iraq will be reached when we have turned governance
over to the Iraqi people, they’ve been able to establish a democratic government. They’re well on
their way to doing that. [LAME AGAIN!] They’ll have free elections next January for the first
time in history. [WHO’S HE KIDDING?] We
also are actively, rapidly training Iraqis to take on the security responsibility. [THAT’S
WHY INTERIM PRIME MINISTER ALLAWI SAID YESTERDAY THAT IRAQ’S POLICE
FORCE CAN’T QUELL THE
INSURGENCY
.] Those two steps are crucial to success in Iraq. They’re
well in hand, well under way. [TRIPLY LAME.] And I’m confident that in fact we’ll get the job
done. [IF HE SAYS SO.]


For me that pretty much settled the issue of who won the debate. Others apparently agreed.
MSNBC.com reported earlier this morning that 1.2
million users of their site replied to the question of who won, and that 63% said John
Edwards, compared with 37% who said Dick Cheney. CNN.com reported that
252,963 of theirs graded Edwards B+ for content and B+ for delivery, compared with Cheney’s
grades of B- for content and B- for delivery.


Those are not scientific polls. But CBS News polled a nationally
representative sample of 178 debate watchers who described themselves as “uncommitted voters”
and found that 41% said Edwards won, compared to 28% who said Cheney won. The rest, 31%,
said it was a tie.


Meanwhile, The Washington Post is running a Daily Tracking Poll of voter
preferences that is so scientific it makes my eyes glaze over. If you can make head or tail of it,
congratulations. Whoever compiled those stats is one helluva serious pollster. This is a poll summary within my
comprehension, except that I hate to think American voters are so dumb.

Share on email
Email
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit

Filed Under: main

Jan Herman

When not listening to Bach or Cuban jazz pianist Chucho Valdes, or dancing to salsa, I like to play jazz piano -- but only in the privacy of my own mind.
Another strange fact... Read More…

About

My Books

Several books of poems have been published in recent years by Moloko Print, Statdlichter Presse, Phantom Outlaw Editions, and Cold Turkey … [Read More...]

Straight Up

The agenda is just what it says: news of arts, media & culture delivered with attitude. Or as Rock Hudson once said in a movie: "Man is the only … [Read More...]

Contact me

We're cutting down on spam. Please fill in this form. … [Read More...]

Archives

Blogroll

Abstract City
AC Institute
ACKER AWARDS New York
All Things Allen Ginsberg
Antiwar.com
arkivmusic.com
Artbook&
Arts & Letters Daily

Befunky
Bellaart
Blogcritics
Booknotes
Bright Lights Film Journal

C-SPAN
Noam Chomsky
Consortium News
Cost of War
Council on Foreign Relations
Crooks and Liars
Cultural Daily

The Daily Howler
Dark Roasted Blend
DCReport
Deep L
Democracy Now!

Tim Ellis: Comedy
Eschaton

Film Threat
Robert Fisk
Flixnosh (David Elliott’s movie menu)
Fluxlist Europe

Good Reads
The Guardian
GUERNICA: A Magazine of Art & Politics

Herman (Literary) Archive, Northwestern Univ. Library
The Huffington Post

Inter Press Service News Agency
The Intercept
Internet Archive (WayBackMachine)
Internet Movie Database (IMDb)
Doug Ireland
IT: International Times, The Magazine of Resistance

Jacketmagazine
Clive James

Kanopy (stream free movies, via participating library or university)
Henry Kisor
Paul Krugman

Lannan Foundation
Los Angeles Times

Metacritic
Mimeo Mimeo
Moloko Print
Movie Geeks United (MGU)
MGU: The Kubrick Series

National Security Archive
The New York Times
NO!art

Osborne & Conant
The Overgrown Path

Poets House
Political Irony
Poynter

Quanta Magazine

Rain Taxi
The Raw Story
RealityStudio.org
Bill Reed
Rhizome
Rwanda Project

Salon
Senses of Cinema
Seven Stories Press
Slate
Stadtlichter Presse
Studs Terkel
The Synergic Theater

Talking Points Memo (TPM)
TalkLeft
The 3rd Page
Third Mind Books
Times Square Cam
The Tin Man
t r u t h o u t

Ubu Web

Vox

The Wall Street Journal
Wikigate
Wikipedia
The Washington Post
The Wayback Machine (Internet Archive)
World Catalogue
World Newspapers, Magazines & News Sites

The XD Agency

Share on email
Email
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit
This blog published under a Creative Commons license

an ArtsJournal blog

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in