First he resigned as chairman of the Defense Policy Board. Now he has
altogether
advocates what might be termed a holy crusade in the Middle East and elsewhere, wrote to
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in his letter of resignation:
We are now approaching a long presidential election campaign, in the course
of which issues on which I have strong views will be widely discussed and debated. I would not
wish those views to be attributed to you or the President at any time, and especially not during a
presidential campaign.
be taken seriously. Does Perle, who’s been called “the intellectual guru of the hard-line
neoconservative movement in foreign policy,” really believe that because he has resigned
from the board his views won’t be associated with the administration’s or the Defense
Department’s.
If nothing else, his letter takes a patronizing view of the American public with a
condescending attitude toward its capacity to understand the workings of government: “A
television viewer or newspaper reader, accustomed to zoning boards, school boards and appeal
boards, is likely to think that the Defense Policy Board actually makes decisions, and that a
member of it must be in a position to speak authoritatively about administration policy.”
Perle has not only played a major role in that policy as a key advocate of the invasion of Iraq;
he has been accused of a conflict of interest for working as a consultant to a company seeking
favors from the Pentagon. And he has just published “An End to Evil: How to Win the War on
Terror,” co-written with David Frum, the former presidential speechwriter who coined the term
“axis of evil” for our Maximum Leader.
In the book, Perle and Frum call for the United States “to overthrow the government of Iran,
abandon support of a Palestinian state, blockade North Korea, use strong-arm tactics with Syria
and China, disregard much of Europe as allies, and sever ties with Saudi Arabia,” amazon.com
reviewer Charlie Williams writes.
Perle notes in his letter, “Many of the ideas in that
book are controversial and I wish to be free to argue them without those views or my arguments
getting caught up in the campaign.” Does he really believe his views won’t be caught up in the
campaign? If he’s so concerned, why doesn’t he just shut up?
Postscript: Then you read this: Bush Tightens Rules on Travel to Cuba, and you see
again that the “war on terror” is being exploited for political gain — in this instance
for south Florida votes — by an administration too corrupt at the top to permit
transparency. As Alexander Pope once put it in “The Dunciad”:
Morality, by her false guardians drawn,
Chicane, in furs, and
Casuistry in lawn,
Gasps, as they straighten at each end the cord,
And dies
…
