The independent 9/11 commission,
href="http://www.artsjournal.com/herman/archives20031102.shtml#59184">
color=#003399>which had me worried me, just lost so much of its
independence you have to wonder whether American democracy has become a charade. The
commission’s job — to find out what the Bush administration knew about the 9/11 Al Qaeda
attacks and whether they could have been prevented — has turned into the equivalent of asking the
Saudis to show us their bank records.
Track the progression from last week’s headlines:
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/07/national/07TERR.html">
color=#003399>“9/11 Panel May Reject Offer of Limited Access to
Briefings” (Nov. 7),
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/13/politics/13TERR.html?hp">
color=#003399>“Panel Reaches Deal on Access to 9/11 Papers”
(Nov. 11),
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/14/national/14TERR.html">
color=#003399>“Deal on 9/11 Briefings Lets White House Edit
Papers” (Nov. 13).
Although the headlines tell the story in broad outline, they don’t give the devilish details. The
“deal” means that Bush and his cronies will not only have the right to edit sensitive Oval Office
documents (chiefly Bush’s daily intelligence reports) before letting the commission see
them, but will also have the right to choose what reports to show the commission.
That’s terrific. After all, according to The New York Times, “administration officials
acknowledge that they fear that information in the reports might be construed to suggest that the
White House had clues before Sept. 11, 2001, that Al Qaeda was planning a catastrophic attack.”
Why shouldn’t the maximum leader of a developing banana republic be entitled to sanitize the
records?
color=#003399>Here’s why. (Isn’t it about time Ron Rosenbaum
apologized to Gore Vidal?)
Meantime, Bruce Fierstein gets my vote for
href="http://www.observer.com/pages/newyorkdiary.asp">
color=#003399>funniest take on Der Gropenfuhrer’s plan to investigate
himself. Fierstein thinks it’s a trend to watch — Martha Stewart,
Karl Rove and Kobe Bryant might latch onto it. We’ve already seen how it’s caught on at
the White House.


Recent Comments
Jan Herman on Unbuttoned: Samuel Beckett Meets William Osborne
Done. Thanks for the catch.George Butler on Unbuttoned: Samuel Beckett Meets William Osborne
One more typo to clean up: In the caption under the video link above--to Abbie performing as "Winnie"--her last...william osborne on Unbuttoned: Samuel Beckett Meets William Osborne
Thank you for this, Jan. You are too kind. The "Samuel Beckett Meets William Osborne" is hilarious.Jan Herman on An Absurd Debate About the Last Word
I disagree, Bill. If your reminiscence about Beckett is any measure, I think you should always write blog comments...william osborne on An Absurd Debate About the Last Word
Actually, I wasn’t referring to Gerard’s comment. In fact, I’m embarrassed to say I didn’t do the additional scroll...Jan Herman on An Absurd Debate About the Last Word
Dear Bill -- Now at last the full story! Danke. Merci. I knew you and Beckett had met and...william osborne on An Absurd Debate About the Last Word
One other little thing I forgot. In return for my gift, Beckett wanted to give me tickets to a...william osborne on An Absurd Debate About the Last Word
An interesting topic for me, since I spent seven years doing nothing else but setting the works of Beckett to...Jan Herman onAn Epitaph for Our Golden Era
Thanks, Bill. It puts more light on things. Less irony.william osborne onAn Epitaph for Our Golden Era
“That’s what I find so wonderful, that not a day goes by, to speak in the old style, hardly a...