KEEPING SCORE

Charles Murray is stirring up trouble again. Emily Eakin reports in "A Cultural Scorecard Says West Is Ahead" that he says it's not his intention. "But his record is hard to ignore."

Murray, the conservative co-author of "The Bell Curve," which put the civilized world in an uproar when it professed that whites were smarter than blacks due to differences in hereditary IQ, now claims in another wicked book, "Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950," that:

1) "Europeans and North Americans account for 97 percent of scientific accomplishment," Eakin notes, based on his inventory of "eight fields -- astronomy, biology, chemistry, earth sciences, physics, mathematics, medicine and technology -- as well as a combined index ranking scientists from all disciplines."

2) While Europe has been the overwhelmingly dominant influence on human achievement -- as measured by the relative amount of space given in 34 standard reference works in four languages to 4,002 significant people in the arts and sciences -- the European heyday of great accomplishment is over.

3) The most influential scientist ever is Newton, followed by Galileo and Aristotle. Then in a steep drop come Kepler, Lavoisier, Descartes, Huygens and Laplace, followed by Einstein (ninth on the list), Faraday, Pasteur and Ptolemy. Darwin doesn't show up until 17th, after Hooke, Leibniz, Rutherford and Euler. Finally, Berzelius, Euclid and Maxwell round out the top 20.

"For literature, philosophy and visual art," Eakin writes, "Murray decided that unbaised global inventories were not feasible: the references works were too skewed toward their national traditions. So he created separate indexes by culture instead."

But if you think the scientific list is peculiar, perhaps not so much in makeup as in sequence, the list for the giants of Western literature will amaze you. Shakespeare comes out first, no surprise. But Goethe ranks second, ahead of Dante (third), Virgil (fourth) and Homer (fifth). There is no Cervantes, no Saint Augustine and no Saint Thomas Aquinas, to whose humanist influence on Christianity Murray himself attributes Western dominance.

Any listing like this is bound to be questioned. But when it lays claim to qualitative accuracy based on a statistical method open to doubt -- Eakins quotes several historians and scholars on its biases and value judgments -- it seems a fool's errand.

Murray's top 20 literary giants include Petrarch, but no Plato or Lucretius; Euripedes, but no Aeschylus or Sophocles and no Aristophanes; Byron, but no Wordsworth or Keats, and no Chaucer or Milton; it includes Rousseau, Voltaire, Moliere, Racine and Victor Hugo, but not Montaigne, Balzac, Baudelaire, Stendahl, Flaubert or Proust; Sir Walter Scott but not Jonathan Swift or Jane Austen; Virgil and Horace but not Ovid.

Schiller makes the list but not Freud or Thomas Mann; Boccaccio make the list along with Tolstoy and Dostoevsky; but there's no Pushkin; Ibsen makes the list but not Chekov; there's no Kierkegaard or Nietzsche, Orwell or Joyce, Twain or Faulkner. And what of Yeats or Blake? Not there.