THUGS IN THE WHITE HOUSE
If his column had appeared daily I doubt that I would have anticipated him yesterday, on the second anniversary of 9/11, when I cited a story in the Washington Post and wrote: < FONT color=#003399>"The nation mourns. Gee Dubya Shrub exploits." Today, Krugman cites the same story for a column headlined "Exploiting The Atrocity." (Free registration required.) But he goes on to say a few more things worth noting:
- "It's almost certainly wrong to think that the political exploitation of 9/11 and, more broadly, the administration's campaign to label critics unpatriotic are past their peak."
- Bush "could have governed as the uniter he claimed to be ... [but his] advisers were greedy" and "[n]ow [that] it has all gone wrong," the Bushies are again resorting to thuggish behavior. Krugman puts it euphemistically: They can't "simply lose like gentlemen," he writes. "For one thing, that's not how they operate." (Remember their style during ballot-counting in Florida?)
- For another they have to save their hides. "Everything suggests that there are major scandals -- involving energy policy, environmental policy, Iraq contracts and cooked intelligence -- that would burst into the light of day if the current management lost its grip on power. So these people must win, at any cost."
- Consequently, "if you thought the last two years were bad, just wait: it's about to get worse. A lot worse."
Against this, what have the Democrats got? Howard Dean? John Kerry?? Al Sharpton??? The American Civil Liberties Union???? And now some celebrities with (ahem) clout, who are willing to criticize Bush in an ACLU ad campaign? (Free registration required.)
So it's Richard Dreyfuss and Kristin Davis (who plays Charlotte in "Sex and the City"), Martin Sheen and Kurt Vonnegut, Samuel L. Jackson and Al Pacino, and let's not forget singer Michael Stipe of R.E.M. or Sheryl Crow, vs. the thugs???? Oh, mama. As the editor of National Review told The New York Times: Celebrities "obviously have a right to speak their minds and a right to be morons, and they usually exercise both." How do you defend against quips like that?
Categories:
Sites to See
Abstract City
Air America Radio
AmericaBlog
American Leftist
Andante
Antiwar.com
ArkivMusic.com
Articulate
Arts & Letters Daily
because they are dead
Bill Reed
Blogcritics
Booknotes
Bright Lights Film Journal
Buck Fush
C-SPAN
Center for Cooperative Research
Clive James
Consortium News
Cost of War in Iraq
Council on Foreign Relations
Crooks and Liars
CUNY GRADUATE CENTER Public Programs
TheCuttingFloor
The Daily Howler
David E's Fablog
Dark Roasted Blend
Democracy Now!
Devil Ducky
Doug Ireland
Editor's Cut
Ehrensteinland
Eschaton
Henry Kisor
The Huffington Post
Inter Press Service News Agency
International Relations Center
Internet Movie Database (IMDb)
Jacketmagazine
James Wolcott
Jan Herman (Literary) Archive
Krugman's Blog:
Conscience of a Liberal
Lannan Foundation
Life During Wartime
Low Culture
Metacritic
Museum of Television & Radio
Nat. Arts Journalism Program
National Security Archive
Noam Chomsky
NO!art
Onion Radio News
Open City
Open Library
The Overgrown Path
Political Irony
Postclassic Radio
Rain Taxi
The Raw Story
RealityStudio.org
The Reeler
Rhizome
Rwanda Project
Seeing Black
Studs Terkel
Summit Journal
TalkLeft
The Theater Times (Cris Gross)
The 3rd Page
ThugLit: Writing About Wrongs
Times Square Cam
The Tin Man
Truthdig
t r u t h o u t
Wading in the Velvet Sea
Walking Man
Wikigate
Wikipedia, free encyclopedia
Wm. Osborne & Abbie Conant
World O'Crap Man
