The rise of 'biotech art'

web_main04c.jpg On Tuesday, I mused a bit about how scientists have a lot to say about the arts, but artists don't seem to have much to say about science. I still believe that's true, but that's certainly not a categorical statement, as I concede from the beginning. That said, there is a growing field of artists examining the possibilities of what's being called "biotech art" or "bioart." I'm not convinced we know what that actually means yet, but it has to do with this notion of cross-pollination that I talked about. From what I can tell from a quick tour around the internet, this movement is small but based on what I've seen, it's really stunning -- and disturbing. A good place to start is a report by Slate that ran this time last year. It's a slideshow of some of these "bioartists." The above image is by Adam Brandej. His website, called, is scathing and captivating parody of biotechnology. brandejs_245_320-425.jpg
August 1, 2008 8:58 AM |



About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by FlyOver published on August 1, 2008 8:58 AM.

Another scientist talking about art, this time satire was the previous entry in this blog.

Who owns promo CDs? You do, federal judge says is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.