Deep-sixing "24"

I've always found the Fox TV series, 24, morally reprehensible -- despite what a great many TV critics, Emmy voters and even former colleagues at The Dallas Morning News have said. The fact that two years ago, conservative talk-show host and Morning News columnist Mark Davis used a fictional situation in 24 to justify real-life torture only sealed my assessment of the show's glorification of brutal and illegal tactics. It's long been a pathetic irony of the debate over torture that conservative advocates of physical coercion -- such as our president, vice-president and John Yoo -- have presented themselves as hard-headed and practical when, in real life, the interrogation tactics they espouse are often ineffective and, in fact, are welcomed by the fanatically devout who wish to be martyrs. What's more, week after week in 24, torture advocates find a fantastical, extreme situation devised for dramatic purposes -- a ticking time bomb with a terrorist holding the secret to defusing it -- and use it to justify employing torture when no such imminent annihilation exists.

Now, Jane Mayer in a "Letter from Hollywood" in the New Yorker reports that even the Pentagon and West Point instructors fear 24 has gone too far, influenced too many minds, including some of the military personnel we've been training for Iraq. Radio host Laura Ingraham is quoted in the piece: During a recent hospital stay, she says gratefully, watching agent Jack Bauer torture terrorist suspects made her feel better.

There lies the real impulse behind many such tactics. Revenge.

February 20, 2007 12:34 PM | | Comments (4)

Categories:

4 Comments

I have to weigh in in defence of "24". For me, apart from being top entertainment, it has always been a challenge to my own ethical position - when I see Bauer having to make the decisions over the personal versus the national, the individual versus the greater good, it puts me on the spot as to what I would do in that situation, although it is clearly very unlikely that I will ever have to make such tough decisions. However the thinking process makes me deal differently with the life situations I do face. For years, psychologists have been talking about whether violent films and games affect our children, and whether we should censor challenging material and there are good arguments to show that some non-discerning, or already disaffected young people can be influenced by such. "24" is an adult show pitched at those with hopefully some discernment and moral sense and forces them to think about issues normally distant. To say that it can influence adults of discernment to acts of this type is to say there is something wrong with the moral education of our societies far greater than can be influenced by a mere TV show, which is clearly disctinct from reality. "Lay not that mattering unction to the soul of society that it is the madness of "24" that speaks" (to paraphrase Hamlet), when it is individual conscience that acts. And to be honest I can't see the NSA, the CIA and Osama Bin Laden perched on their respective sofas at 12am yelling "Hit him harder" or "Infidel dogs" at the screen. I'm sure they have many more practical immoralities on their minds and consciences.

A. S. Hamrah wrote a very perceptive article on TV and film torture in the LA Times. In particular, he points to the fact that so often what we see are scenes showing the good (white) guy being tortured by the bad (swarthy) ones, when in the world--the opposite of the issue we're dealing with in Guantanamo and Abu elsewhere. Add it to your very enlightening observation that tv torture is always in response to some imminent threat--again unlike "real life"--and we can see that we're in the presence of spontaneous, insidious propaganda. Many thanks.

I haven't watched much television in the last few years so I've never seen 24. But I've often wondered,when reading about it or listening to others discuss it, just how wise it is to have that kind of program on the air in today's world. It seems likely to me that both sides of this struggle with terrorism could be wrongly motivated by such a series.

I wonder if it's finally just about run its course. Here's hoping so.

Hey, another person who doesn't like that show! I can't stand it, or, in fact, much of what purports to be entertainment on TV (or movies, which I'm mostly too cheap to go to at $12 a pop around here). It's violent, inaccurate and just plain dumb. But frightening to think that TV is what is raising our next generations.
Thanks for standing up. Hope people hear you!

Leave a comment

Recommending

Books I'm currently recommending . . . 

lush%20life.jpg

Richard Price's best novel since Clockers, Lush Life is a slice of life on the Lower East Side, complete with the ghetto kids, the new bohemians, the old Jews and the cops. A restaurant manager at 35 fears he's no longer the wannabe artiste who'd turn into a full-blown artiste some day. When he sees a younger version of himself get shot during a mugging (and then gets blamed by the cops), he comes apart. Price takes these cultures and stares through all of them. Lush Life is a crime novel, a terrific literary thriller, a sampler of Price's namebrand talents with dialogue and deadpan humor. Price is after more than just law-and-order, crime-and-punishment, justice-is-served. This is a portrait of big-city America..You think The Wire, Law and Order, the old Homicide are the best TV has to offer? This is all that -- between covers.

In Life Class, Booker Prize-winner Pat Barker returns to World War I, the setting for her magnificent Restoration trilogy. Where those novels followed shell-shocked poets Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfrid Owen through their convalescence, Life Class follows three painting students (based on real Slade School artists Christopher Nevinson and Paul Nash) as the war approaches. Elinor wants little to do with the war or with men: They're distractions from her art. Kit, a hot, young futurist, is primed for the war's industrialized destruction, while Paul flees his working-class background. As usual with Barker, the sexual relationships, war-time atmosphere and gruesome battlefield details are brilliantly conveyed: Her prose is lean but lyrical, compassionate yet cool-headed. No character is quite as compelling as Regeneration's bitter bisexual, Billy Prior, but the Great War's upheavals in art and combat, sex and class, provide Barker with material for exceptional historical novels. A new trilogy? One hopes so.

more

Best of the Vault

THE REVIEWS: 

Pat Barker, Frankenstein, Cass Sunstein on the internet, Samuel Johnson, Thrillers, Denis Johnson, Alan Furst, Caryl Phillips, Richard Flanagan, George Saunders, Michael Harvey, Larry McMurtry, Harry Potter and more ...

ESSAY: 

Big D between the sheets -- Dallas in fiction

ESSAY:  

Reviewing the state of reviewing

ESSAY:  

9/11 as a novel: Why?

ESSAY:  

How can critics say the things they do? And why does anyone pay attention? It's the issue of authority.

The disappearing book pages:  

Papers are cutting book coverage for little reason

Thrillers and Lists:  

Noir favorites, who makes the cut and why

more

Blogroll

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by book/daddy published on February 20, 2007 12:34 PM.

Down and Out was the previous entry in this blog.

Not quite winning: a review is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

Introducing
AJ Arts Blog Ads

Now you can reach the most discerning arts blog readers on the internet. Target individual blogs or topics in the ArtsJournal ad network.

Advertise Here

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

special
Program Notes
the blog of the National Performing Arts Convention
culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
CultureGulf
Rebuilding Gulf Culture after Katrina
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Stage Write
Elizabeth Zimmer on time-based art forms

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.