Fostering critical response to complex experience

Critical Response

Critical Response Card

During the CAPACOA conference in Toronto, I attended a fantastic workshop on the ‘Critical Response Protocol‘ — a process developed to encourage reflection, connection, and inclusion in group discussions about artworks, texts, lessons, performances, or any other complex shared experience. Facilitators Judy Harquail and Tim Yerxa had been trained in the protocol, and talked us through it after we had all experienced a performance work by Tara Cheyenne Friedenberg.

Developed and refined by the Perpich Center for Arts Education in Minnesota, the Critical Response Protocol is deceptively straightforward. It defines a timed list of questions/discussions that any facilitator can use with a learning group (post-show audience discussion, classroom reflection, book club, whatever). The facilitator does not need to be an expert in the content of the discussion, but does need to follow the guidelines of the protocol. They are there to guide the process and set the tone, not to lecture or expound or correct. So, with some preparation, any staff member, board member, or even audience member could lead the process.

In brief (a two-sided PDF describing the protocol is available for the details), the facilitator welcomes the group and introduces the process, explaining that ”we can better understand any complex work or experience when we slow down and first pay attention to what we notice, remember, feel, and wonder about it.” And then the prompting questions begin:

  1. What did you notice? (10 minutes)
    Encouraging participants to share what they saw or heard during the experience, without judgment. If judgment emerges, the facilitator asks for the evidence upon which that judgment was based: ”What did you see that makes you say that?”
  2. What did it remind you of? (10 minutes)
    Encouraging participants to share how they can connect the work to their own life, what they recalled when they experienced it.
  3. How did you or do you feel? (10 minutes)
    Sharing what feelings the work evoked in them, or continues to evoke.
  4. What questions does it raise? (10 minutes)
    What does the experience make you wonder about?
  5. Speculate (10 minutes)
    Asking the group to speculate about what the work helps them to understand, or what they think was the artist’s intent.
  6. Respond/Discuss/Reflect (10-20 minutes)
    Opening the conversation for more general discussions, connections, reflections.

All in, the process takes 70-85 minutes, which in our demonstration went by quickly. The power of the process is extraordinary — to welcome everyone into conversation, to validate whatever it is they saw or remembered or felt, to acknowledge and integrate their questions about what they saw and what it meant to others, to delay the impulse to judge the work without first creating a shared idea of what the work was. The artist was not present (which seemed best to foster an open discussion about our experience). But we were primed to ask the artist more focused and responsive questions than we might have otherwise. In fact, we were aching to ask some question of the artist, given the energy and discovery of our conversation.

The protocol is openly available, and easy to attempt. If you’re looking for a better structure and strategy for any discussion with your constituents (audiences, boards, staff, colleagues), you should consider this one. It’s available, along with many other helpful protocols and tools, on the Artful Tools resource page.

 

Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit

Comments

  1. Deb says

    Critical Response *is* awesome; I use it in writing workshops – and in one-on-one work I do with clients. It’s such a wonderful way to have artists and writers (actually, anyone) become more actively engaged in getting the sort of support they’ll need to improve their work.

    However (credit where it’s due …), the process was created/developed/refined by an artist/dancer/choreographer/educator: Liz Lerman of Dance Exchange, not the Perpich Center. More info on Liz and her fabulous stuff: http://www.lizlerman.com/crpLL.html :)

    • says

      Thanks Deb! And thanks also for the connection to the Liz Lerman Dance Exchange process, which is similar but also different than the Perpich approach.

      Liz’s process is brilliant for enabling productive feedback for artists and creators. It’s designed to facilitate critical response to evolving or completed creative work, so the artist or creative team can frame what they need in the process. The Critical Response Protocol from Perpich is audience focused…it’s intended to help individuals find and make meaning from shared experience.

      Both are fantastic. Both likely speak to each other in intriguing ways. But I see them as different tools for different purpose.

      • Deb says

        Right. Looks like Perpich tweaked the process a bit … but since Liz was the originator of the whole shebang, and I know a lot of people read your stuff, I just thought she deserved the shout-out. :)

  2. Barbara Hackett Cox says

    Thanks for the blog post on the Critical Response Protocol. If you go to http://opd.mpls.k12.mn.us/Origins_of_Tool_CR.html you will see acknowledgment of Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process developed for her DC based Dance Exchange as a way to dialog about works in progress. In our Minnesota Artful work her process is most like our “Tuning Protocol”. The Artful Critical Response protocol as referenced in this blog builds on the work of Minneapolis based teacher and poet, George Roberts—who in turn learned the process from visual artist Judith Rood. The protocol was further developed and disseminated by teaching artist Melissa Borgmann, a colleague in Minnesota who also worked on the Weisman Museum’s Artful Writing project which created another version known as the “Perceive Card”. see http://weisman.jaws.umn.edu/artfulwriting/teachers.php

    We are all about collaboration and open source resources here through our MN based Artist to Artist network http://a2anetwork.org/

    Thanks to Andrew for posting this on the blog just a day before two of my colleagues, Becca Barniskis and Mary Jo Thompson, and I presented a 2 hour session on Critical Response for Lois Hetland and the Studio Thinking Framework online cohort. We will be posting some of the resources soon on the Artist to Artist site.

    We have had the opportunity in the past 8 years to introduce this way of working with reflective practice for a number of arts organizations and arts ed programs in Iowa, CT, TN, CA, ND and SD and apparently it has found its way to Canada!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>