• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

Can you scale the house at the movie theatre?: Updated (no, you can’t)

February 8, 2023 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

US cinema chain AMC has announced it will start to have differential prices for movie seating:

Three pricing tiers will soon be offered. For example, the highest-end “Preferred” tier are in the middle of the theaters and will be priced at a “slight premium” compared to its “Standard” tier, which the theater chains says will remain the most common choice and will be sold for the “traditional cost of a ticket.” The third tier is called “Value,” which are seats in the front row of theaters and will cost less than than its “Standard” tier.

Does this make sense? Movie theatres already engage deeply in price discrimination between avid movie goers and occasional visitors by using two-part pricing: keep ticket prices at a reasonable rate (to bring in the “occasionals” and fill seats that would otherwise be empty) and have very high mark-ups at the concession stand, which is most frequently visited by the avid movie goers. But can they scale the house?

In general, a firm can charge different prices for different quality levels so long as the difference in quality – the luxury edition of a car over the standard, a seat right behind the third-base dugout over the right-field bleachers, the extra leg room from an “economy plus” airline ticket over the ordinary cramped space – makes it worth it for the quality-seeking customer to pay extra. Otherwise, everyone just buys the less expensive version.

So AMC has to be banking on movie-goers thinking there is a real difference in seat quality, enough to pay a bit extra (they are also banking on seating purchases being easily enforced). Maybe in a past era of serious cinema this might have been the case: Roger Ebert had thoughts on this. But in our era of comic book characters blasting each other at deafening volume? Is Row 11 Center at the boxy multiplex a lot better than Row 16 Side? I don’t see it.

UPDATE: In the July 21 New York Times:

AMC Entertainment, the world’s largest theater chain, said on Thursday that it would “pivot away” from a contentious initiative called Sightline, in which seats at evening screenings had three tiers of pricing, ending the long-held cinema custom of charging the same amount for any seat in a theater. (Discounts of $1 to $2 were offered for the neck-craning front row, increases of $1 to $2 were charged for the center-middle and the status quo remained for the rest.)

The concept was rolled out in March at theaters in New York, Illinois and Kansas to howls of protest from some moviegoers. AMC always labeled it as a test.

The experiment will end sometime in August, an AMC spokesman said. 

It is a lesson for any arts presenter who wants to do some sort of indirect price discrimination on the basis of quality: there has to be a difference in the quality of the offerings large enough to get at least some people to opt for the pricier option.

See also…

Share:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Carlo on What to do with the NEA? Make it Conservative?: “The Kennedy Center is offering $25 tickets in only select orchestra seating for the performances of Washington National Opera: Porgy…” May 20, 14:17
  • Carlo on Art in Turbulent Times: “The Kennedy Center today is selling discounted tickets for the Washington Opera for $20.” May 1, 21:31
  • Montague Gammon III on Art in Turbulent Times: “We would like to think that a Trumped Kennedy Center would experience a significant downturn in attendance, but we should…” Apr 22, 05:51
  • Ed Comet on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “The author has gone to the Grand Canyon with a magnifying glass, and found the rocks uninteresting.. The NEA does…” Apr 12, 16:42
  • Brtian Newhouse on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “I think that for arts patronage to work, there has to be some consensus that the activities of making and…” Apr 12, 14:28
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in