• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

The economic impact of everything

March 16, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

I feel youGoing to a bar to watch basketball, for example. From the New Republic:

Nearly one-third of Americans plan to watch games at work this year, according to a survey from the consumer site RetailMeNot. One in five men said they’d go to a bar to watch at lunch.

But?

March Madness may actually be good for the economy—and for individual companies.

Go on …

Hotels and restaurants in the 14 cities that host games will gain the most, thanks to traveling fans cheering on their teams. But even businesses in non-host cities can benefit. That same RetailMeSurvey found that 28 percent of fans will spend $100 or more if their team makes it to the Sweet 16. They might spend it on new hoodies or hats—or, in some cases, on new large-screen televisions.

Sigh.

Share:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Trackbacks

  1. ArtsJournal – Top Posts From AJBlogs 03.16.14 says:
    March 16, 2014 at 10:07 pm

    […] The economic impact of everything AJBlog: For What it’s Worth | Published 2014-03-17 […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Brian Newhouse on Gut Punch: “That too. Politics in art isn’t a matter of having the right position on an issue, but the matter of…” Jun 10, 02:19
  • Michael Rushton on Gut Punch: “I agree. There can be interesting art about politics, but, if I recall correctly as said by Tom Stoppard, the…” Jun 9, 11:27
  • Brian Newhouse on Gut Punch: “Naveen Kumar has a very narrow view of what “big questions” are.; but that’s par for the course these days.…” Jun 9, 10:15
  • Michael Rushton on Reckoning with Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Policy: “Hello Brian, I’m not sure how much I qualify as an intellectual, but this liberal conservative will make the affirmation…” May 25, 15:52
  • Brian Newhouse on Reckoning with Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Policy: “It seems to me that in order to counter Bourdieu’s arguments, especially as they might apply to government arts policy…” May 25, 15:06
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in