• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

Taking pricing seriously

July 29, 2013 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

crossroadsMany posts in this blog have been about how arts organizations, especially in the nonprofit or public sectors, can learn a thing or two about strategic pricing from other organizations, including non-arts commercial firms. But at The Economist, blogger Schumpeter writes that the private sector is not all that sharp when it comes to pricing either:

Firms should simply take pricing more seriously: have a clear policy and make everyone stick to it. Obvious? At a recent conference organised by Simon-Kucher, the 100 or so delegates were asked to put their hands up if their company had a written pricing policy. Just two did so. Setting prices, promotions and discounts is often left to junior people and local sales offices. Even where a policy is set from the top, the salespeople may ignore it because they are still being rewarded for maximising sales and keeping customers. Neil Hampson, a pricing expert at PWC, says he sometimes starts his client meetings by asking: “When was the last time you congratulated a salesman for walking away from a client?” Most have never done so.

It’s not so hard to cut prices in order to increase sales, and that will positively impact ‘market share,’ but to what end? Strategic pricing involves knowing when a general price cut is not good strategy, when it will lead to a fall in net revenues.

This was striking:

Equipment-makers who sell to other businesses can be especially prone to a “cost-plus” mentality, in which they charge the same margin to everyone instead of identifying those that are less price-sensitive and finding ways to earn more from them.

There is nothing strategic about setting prices by adding some fixed percentage to costs. Smart pricing is all about knowing your potential audience, whether there are groups more or less price sensitive to what you offer, the degree to which there are different demands for different levels of quality, or quantity, which consumers are interested in package deals, and so on.

So don’t assume the private sector always knows what it’s doing when it comes to pricing.

Share:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Trackbacks

  1. For What It's Worth | Amazon and the independents says:
    July 30, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    […] can understand, and that’s how I teach pricing. Relentless price-cutting to gain market share makes less sense to me. I am skeptical of the strategy of ‘we will drive all of our competitors out of business, and […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply to For What It's Worth | Amazon and the independents Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Carlo on What to do with the NEA? Make it Conservative?: “The Kennedy Center is offering $25 tickets in only select orchestra seating for the performances of Washington National Opera: Porgy…” May 20, 14:17
  • Carlo on Art in Turbulent Times: “The Kennedy Center today is selling discounted tickets for the Washington Opera for $20.” May 1, 21:31
  • Montague Gammon III on Art in Turbulent Times: “We would like to think that a Trumped Kennedy Center would experience a significant downturn in attendance, but we should…” Apr 22, 05:51
  • Ed Comet on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “The author has gone to the Grand Canyon with a magnifying glass, and found the rocks uninteresting.. The NEA does…” Apr 12, 16:42
  • Brtian Newhouse on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “I think that for arts patronage to work, there has to be some consensus that the activities of making and…” Apr 12, 14:28
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in