• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

Voluntary price discrimination is not a new idea

March 18, 2013 by Michael Rushton 2 Comments

looking for fundingAlyssa Rosenberg on crowdsourcing new movies:

One thing that’s striking about the Veronica Mars Kickstarter is that you have to give at least $35, more than four times the cost of the average American movie ticket in 2012, to get a digital download of the movie. You have to give $750 to get a ticket to the premiere of the film in Los Angeles.

An Andrew Sullivan reader says:

What I find particularly brilliant about the Rob Thomas/Veronica Mars Kickstarter project is that the producers of a good have found a way to exploit certain consumers’ higher willingness-to-pay for that good as a means of financing the good’s production.  I’m sure most of your readers have at least a vague recollection from Econ 101 of intersecting supply and demand curves, and the notion that customers towards the left of the demand curve were willing to pay more for that good than the market-clearing price.  Until now, there hasn’t really been a way to charge $50 a ticket, or $500 a ticket, to the people who really value the movie that much, while only $10 a ticket to the customer whose interest in the movie is only marginal.  But then you dangle the carrot that the movie will only exist if the customers with high willingness-to-pay step up … and suddenly you’ve found a way to tap into that enthusiasm.

Hmmm. If we could now turn to Professor Henry Hansmann, “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise” Yale Law Journal, 1980:

At first impression, it is not obvious why the performing arts are typically the product of nonprofit institutions … [and] in fact depend on voluntary contributions for a substantial part of their operating budgets. … Why is it that the organizations do not simply raise their ticket prices rather than try to coax part of the cost of the performance out of the audience in the form of donations? … In this situation contributions are, in essence, a form of voluntary price discrimination, or, in other words, a means whereby different customers can be charged different prices for the same service. … It is worth a great deal to some people to be able to see a production by, for example, the Metropolitan Opera, while for others it is worth less … If everyone could be made to pay for a ticket roughly what it is worth to him, the total receipts for a production would be much higher than if the price is set at an amount that represents its worth to the member of the audience who values it least – which is the result with a single ticket price for everybody. … Individuals can, however, simply be asked to volunteer to pay an additional sum if the ticket price is lower than the value they place on the performance, and this is, in effect, what the nonprofit performing arts groups do.

Share:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: issues

Comments

  1. Dan says

    March 19, 2013 at 2:02 am

    More money is spent on entertainment in the USA than anything else. Think about what we do to entertain ourselves and then think about how much each of us spends, it’s mind boggling.

    Reply
  2. walrus1998headshothippo says

    January 14, 2016 at 5:57 am

    Thanks for sharing 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton teaches in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the arts, copyright, nonprofit organizations and tax policy, and served as Co-Editor of the Journal of Cultural Economics. At IU he teaches Read More…

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Heather Beasley on Artists’ guaranteed income, and how to do arts policy analysis: “The difficult part will be assessing “better art” – post-modernism basically destroyed generally-agreed-upon critical standards for artistic merit. “More art”…” Mar 25, 07:51
  • Antonio C. Cuyler on Does arts’ share of GDP matter?: “Comparing the U. S. funding scheme to other countries’ seems like comparing apples to pears because folx typically compare direct…” Mar 20, 07:39
  • Paul Kassel on Does arts’ share of GDP matter?: “I also chafe at justifying the arts via economic indicators, but in a capitalist society it’s the lingua Franca and…” Mar 20, 05:05
  • Chris on Really, it is OK for a college to sell art: “Not okay, ever, for a museum to sell works that were given expressly to be shown, cared for and used…” Mar 19, 06:51
  • Antonio C. Cuyler on Does arts’ share of GDP matter?: “As always, Michael, I also appreciate you posing the question. It’s very important, especially in juxtaposition with politicians, i. e.…” Mar 18, 07:25
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in