• Home
  • About
    • We the Audience
    • Lynne Conner
    • Contact
  • Other AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

We the Audience

Lynne Conner at the Intersection of Live+Digital

The Talking Cure, Part III (productive talk)

April 6, 2014 by Lynne Conner 3 Comments

RobertFrost stampI talk in order to understand; I teach in order to learn. ~Robert Frost

As I wrote in my last post, the Arts Talk model envisions an environment where a variety of forms of talk, from dialogue to discussion to debate, are not only possible but also are common. While dialogue as a mechanism for achieving consensus and greater understanding is a key goal for engendering engagement around the arts, thoughtfully facilitated discussions and debates can also be fruitful (and deeply pleasurable).

But in order for these various forms of talk to be an engine for a new era of arts appreciation, they have to be productive.

Productive talking begins with a need—in this case the need to arrive at a shared appreciation of the multiple interpretations that can be voiced in conversation. For philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer, language is at the core of our ability not only to know the world but also to know another. “Language is the medium in which substantive understanding and agreement take place between two people,” he writes in Truth and Method, stressing that in participating in the act of conversation we have to put our own prejudices (he calls them fore-meanings) and understandings to the test.

As linguist Ronald Wardhaugh writes in How Conversation Works, a conversation is “not simply about something, nor is it merely a series of somethings, such as topics. A conversation is something. It is a performance, a kind of show in which the participants act out as well as speak whatever it is they are doing.”

Taking my cue from Gadamer and Wardhaugh, my definition of productive talk, whether in the form of dialogue, discussion, or debate, is talk that originates in order to (1) communicate about a specific topic, (2) air publicly a range of opinions and perspectives on that topic, (3) listen and consider other points of view, and (4) work toward both collective and individual meaning making. This definition should hold regardless of whether that “room” is physical or virtual.

The productivity here is both literal, involving the effective exchange of information and viewpoints, and symbolic, in that people finish the experience with a new connection to the information and ideas that came out of the exchange and a new understanding between participants. In an environment where productive talk is encouraged and supported, community spirit flourishes, arising naturally out of the new understanding in the room.

But of course defining productive talk and actually achieving it are two different things. In the final two posts on the theme of The Talking Cure (coming this week), I’ll explore the nature of powerful questioning and attentive listening and offer a set of values for facilitating productive talk around the serious arts.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. richard kooyman says

    April 7, 2014 at 3:26 pm

    “The artist has some internal experience that produces a poem, a painting, a piece of music. Spectators submit themselves to the work, which generates an inner experience for them. But historically it’s a very new, not to mention vulgar, idea that the spectator’s experience should be identical to, or even have anything to do with, the artist’s. That idea comes from an over-industrialized society which has learned to distrust magic.”

    SAMUEL R. DELANY, Dhalgren

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. ArtsJournal – Top Posts From AJBlogs 04.06.14 says:
    April 7, 2014 at 1:22 am

    […] The Talking Cure, Part III (productive talk) AJBlog: We The Audience | Published 2014-04-06 […]

    Reply
  2. We the Audience | Arts Democracy Now! says:
    September 1, 2014 at 10:13 am

    […] productive talk about the serious arts just might have a chance. As I have noted before in this blog and in my new book, productive talk in an arts context is talk that originates in order to (1) […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lynne Conner

Lynne is a theatre and dance historian, a playwright and director, a community-based arts activist, a college professor and a cultural theorist with an emphasis on audience studies. She realizes that this list of professional activities appears unconventionally broad, but from her perspective they all share a common root: the belief that participation in the arts (as audience members and as practitioners) is the best way to make sense of the world. And making sense of the world is, well, what we humans do. [Read More]

About We The Audience

Post by Hannah Grannemann, Guest EditorPart of the series: Audiences During the Pandemic I’ve developed a routine of watching theater online during the pandemic: comfy clothes, a specific … [Read More...]

Archives

April 2014
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Mar   May »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Relax and enjoy the show.
  • Holidays are canceled?
  • Appreciations of reopening
  • Is there anybody out there? Yes.
  • Finally: Arts Organizations Have Some Fun

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in