I had the middle part kind of vaguely in mind. I thought, “We could do this, but then we’d have to modulate again and we’re already playing in 5/4 and six flats, and that’s enough for one day’s work.” Fortunately, we tried it, and that’s where you get the main part of the song.Paul Desmond
At the time, I thought it was kind of a throwaway. I was ready to trade in the entire rights of “Take Five” for a used Ronson electric razor.Paul Desmond
Desmond changed his mind about swapping the â€œTake Fiveâ€ royalties for a shaver. Following his death in 1977, his will directed gifts of personal items and bequests of cash to a number of relatives and friends. The royalties went elsewhere. As recounted in the Coda chapter of Take Five: The Public and Private Lives of Paul Desmond:
The balance of Desmondâ€™s residuary estate, after payment of debts and taxes, went to The American Red Cross. â€œResiduaryâ€ is the fateful word in that provision of Desmondâ€™s will. Every year since his death, through his royalties from â€œTake Five,â€ his other compositions, his recordings and his share of the Brubeck Quartet recordings, Desmond has kept on earning. Noel Silverman (the executor of his estate) sends the Red Cross the money in increments of $25,000 as it accumulates in the estateâ€™s account. In 1991 the total reached more than a million dollars.
For years, the Red Cross accepted the money but recognized the flow of payments only in form letters. In 2002, Silverman had had enough of the relief agencyâ€™s bureaucratic insensitivity. He wrote a letter that included this paragraph:
It is easy to accuse the Red Cross of ingratitude. I suspect that that may be less than accurate. It may simply be that the organization is poorly run, badly mannered, or understandably not concerned with gifts which are not dependent on whether or not they are acknowledged. Come to think of it, organizational ungraciousness may not be such a bad description after all.
That resulted in a high-ranking Red Cross official going from Washington, DC, to New York to meet with Silverman. She pronounced herself â€œhorrified.â€ The Desmond estate began to receive closer attention. From the book:
Finally, the Red Cross informed Silverman that at the annual dinner dance of the organization in New York, Desmond would be honored with a posthumous tribute. On April 8, 2003, Silverman accepted the honor in Paulâ€™s memory. He announced at the banquet that Desmondâ€™s total contribution to the Red Cross had reached four million dollars and was growing.
â€œHe has left us a double legacyâ€”not only the art itself but the ongoing proceeds of that creativity as well,â€ Silverman told the Red Cross executives, donors and staff members. â€œIt is easy to forget, however, that the Paul Desmonds of our world need and deserve our support just as we need theirs. Not because they may end up as contributors to the Red Cross, but because they constitute the soul of our society. Our failure to support themâ€”the authors, the artists, the musicians, the dramatists, even the ones that defy easy descriptionâ€”leaves us poorer. We are who we are because of them. Our governmentâ€™s increasing insistence that the arts are irrelevant or, worse yet, subversive, is of course sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect, as it needs to be in a vibrant, pluralistic society. We cannot easily do without organizations like the Red Cross, and we fail to support them at our peril, but the same is equally if not more true of our artistic community. Honoring the Paul Desmonds of the world is not a luxury. It is a necessity, and the fact that the Red Cross is the financial beneficiary of his munificence is simply icing on the cake.â€
I spoke with Noel Silverman this morning. He told me that Desmondâ€™s contributions to the Red Cross, largely by way of â€œTake Fiveâ€™sâ€ royalties, are now â€œwell north of six million dollars.â€