an blog | AJBlog Central | Contact me

A Museum Merger That Seems Sensible

From time to time, especially in times of economic uncertainty, the word “merger” gets bandied about as as solution to museum problems. In reality, art museum mergers are rare. I think (though I don’t have statistics on that). And they probably should be rare. But sometimes they make sense, and I was pleased recently to read of a merger that does.

Demuth_museumLast Tuesday, the Lancaster Museum of Art in Pennsylvania, which has a local-artist focus, and the Demuth Museum, dedicated to Charles Demuth (a native son) and also in Lancaster, said they are merging. The two locations will remain, but they will become “one museum with one mission.” The two have worked on this for two years, they say, which bodes well–even if it’s necessary ecomonically, it’s not a shotgun marriage. And it involved pre-announcement due diligence and discussion. Lancaster’s mayor, Rick Gray, and Sam Bressi, the president and CEO of the Lancaster County Community Foundation, were there at the announcement, showing local support.

Anne M. Lampe, currently the Demuth’s director, will become the executive director and chief curator of both museums.

I’ve been only to the Demuth, not the Lancaster, but from afar this union makes sense economically–there should be a fair bit of savings in administrative costs.  They may sometimes collaborate on exhibitions, but they intend to remain separate identities and curatorial programs.

Both are small places–the Demuth’s annual budget is $500,000, while the Lancaster’s is $750,000, according to local news reports.  Do they need separate adminstrations? Doubtful. Should they waste effort competing for donors? No. Can there be synergy between educational and outreach programs? I think so. Joint ticketing? I hope so.

Here’s more in the press release and in last week’s article on LancasterOnline.

 

Comments

  1. Interestingly, the transit system serving Lancaster is merging with the transit system serving Reading. This happened with the retirement of the director in Reading.

    Anyway, it makes sense for small museums to consolidate back of the house functions. FWIW, I recommend this for “friends of” groups for parks and libraries. That there should be master organizations that provide back of the house support to separate “affinity groups” for specific installations, so they can focus on the nitty gritty and not be bogged down in administration.

  2. Oh, speaking of innovativeness in Lancaster’s institutions, their waste management authority has some heft too, and bailed Harrisburg out by buying their problematic waste management facilities and are renewing them successfully.

    Lancaster’s urban revitalization program is quite successful, there are a lot of creative organizations, galleries, funky nightlife establishments, stores, etc. It happens we were there last weekend, and I always enjoy going.

an ArtsJournal blog