The news I foreshadowed here on Aug. 15 has come true.
Jeffrey Hamburger, the Harvard professor behind the petition, now more than a year-old, asking Prussian authorities to reconsider their plan to mothball half of Berlin’s collection of Old Masters so they could place a modern art collection in the Gemaldegalerie (pictured at right), their current home, is declaring victory.
And, true, the Old Master paintings will not move from their current location. The Foundation of Prussian Cultural Heritage has done what one German newspaper called a U-turn, admitting that its original plan, to build a separate museum for the paintings on Museum Island near the Bode Museum, which is home to Old Master sculpture, is too expensive and will not take place. It would have cost 375 million euros.
That is what many of us petitioners feared — that the Old Master put in storage while the new building came into being would last a very long time, possibly indefinitely. Some never wanted the Old Masters to leave the Gemaldegalerie, period, but I was not among them. Nor was I among those who felt any delay in returning them to view — even an indefinite one — was worth it to have the Old Master paintings close to the Old Master sculpture on Museum Island.
So here’s where we are now: In a press release issued about the feasibility study they ordered because of the petition, the Foundation admits that simultaneously placing the modern art in the Gemaldegalerie in the Culture Forum AND relocating the Old Masters to Museum Island is not financially feasible. Therefore, it will now make plans to build a museum for the modern collection at the Culture Forum on Sigismundstraße. It will have 106,500 sq. ft. and cost 130 million euros.
The board of trustees and Parliament must still approve this new plan. The board next meets in December.
Many thanks to a reader in Germany, Wolfgang Gülcker, for sending me the official news.
Gebhard Dettmar says
Thank god!!! “Some never wanted the Old Masters to leave the Gemaldegalerie, period, but I was not among them.” I was. The only thing missing now is the permanent exhibition of the 1rst half 20th century in the New National Gallery like it was till Sept. 2011
Paul Woolley says
Dear Judith (if I may),
As a resident Berliner and a committed adherent of theview that the Gemäldegalerie should remain untouched, I was very pleased to hear the decision. However, one thing you may have got wrong: are you really sure that the feasability study was ordered because of the petition? According to all the local news media it was a purely financial decision and had nothing to do with the petition.
Best regards and thnks for your article,
Judith H. Dobrzynski says
Thanks for your comment. I would say that the petition forced the feasibility study, first, and second, being a long time journalist, that is what they all say. It’s a fig leaf, I think. They just don’t want to be seen as acting under pressure.
Also, please see this post: http://www.artsjournal.com/realcleararts/2013/08/the-berlin-saga-a-new-proposal-keeps-the-old-masters-where-they-are.html
If you read the Taggesspiegel article, and the one accompanying it, I believe the foundation admits that it underestimated the opposition to the plan.