• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
    • Real Clear Arts
    • Judith H. Dobrzynski
    • Contact
  • ArtsJournal
  • AJBlogs

Real Clear Arts

Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture

Metropolitan Museum Makes “Connections” — But Misses Many, Too

The Metropolitan Museum of Art* rolled out the first effort of its new Digital Media Department yesterday; it’s called Connections, and it is planned to be a once-a-week release of a 4-minute online interactive feature. For the kickoff, the Met has posted four of them.

carrie_rebora_barratt.jpgHere’s the description:

Episodes are comprised of audio narration and slide shows of the works of art discussed, as well as links to contextual background. Each Connections episode explores a broad theme through the subjective and personal viewpoint of a Museum staff member. Participants will include curators, conservators, scientists, librarians, educators, photographers, designers, editors, digital media producers, technicians, administrators, executive staff, and many other staff.

Met director Thomas Campbell introduces the feature here.

The subjects of the first four are promising.

  • “Small Things,” in which Associate Director Carrie Rebora Barrett (above) seeks out tiny works in the collection.
  • “Virtuosity,” which finds paintings conservator Michael Gallagher (below) talking about “the appeal of technical virtuosity.”
  • “Maps,” wherein Medieval art curator Melanie Holcomb explains “how maps help her make sense of the world.”
  • “Tennessee,” in which video producer Christopher Noey waxes nostalgic about his childhood home via works in the museum.

These topics, all interesting, illustrate a nice range of access points for people not necessarily versed in art and who want to enjoy it anyway, and for people who are knowledgeable about art to see things from a different perspective. For all, they are a way to listen to an expert and see their selections.

michael_gallagher.jpgThe interactive part is minimal: “visitors can link to additional information about the works of art: the time period in which they were made, the geographic origins of the works, and where works on view can be found in the Museum’s galleries.”

Still, for the idea, I give the Met an A. 

The execution, however, is…well, needs improvement. The two I sampled — more about why in a minute — were slide shows of artworks with voiceovers by the narrator. Very static. I had pictured a real video, with the narrator holding or standing near the artwork, in the galleries, and perhaps a walk from one to another (speeded up, for fun). But there was nothing like that. And why are the narrators pictured in black and white?  

Barrett’s entry also suffers from a mismatch between what she’s saying and what is being seen on screen, which is pretty unforgivable. That was fixed in Gallagher’s virtuoso picks. 

Barrett’s has two other flaws: In a riff on “small things,” the feature does not provide dimensions of the works. And, horribly, when you click on “In the Museum,” to find out where to go to find these objects, several are not currently on view. That’s also unforgivable.

What about the other two episodes? I don’t know, because my computer froze during the loading process. I has to shut it down, and reboot — and I decided to finish this post before going back to Connections, to see if I could Connect. This problem could well be my computer, and I do not blame the Met (for now).  

I like this idea, and I expect the Met to improve on its execution. Right now, it’s a bit of a disappointment. 

More details in the press release, including the ideas behind the next five features. 

If you go to the Met’s home page, btw, you’ll notice a change — which I think may have happened on Jan. 1. No more landing page, with the artwork of the day. You go right to the home page, where there’s a rotating banner of temporary exhibitions. 

I get it, some people didn’t have the patience to “Enter.” But I kind of liked seeing the artwork of the day. 

The new website wasn’t announced, and it’s obviously still in the making. Perhaps it will be rolled out one change at a time.

Which brings me to another problem: there’s no link to “Connections” on the website — for now, at least, you have to know the URL (www.metmuseum.org/connections).

UPDATE, 1/5: As a commenter (below) reported, the announcement of Connections is now posted on the home page, with the link to it, under “Now At the Met.” And it’s permanent home looks to be under “Works of Art,” right beneath the Timeline of Art History.

Photo Credit: Courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum

*I consult to a foundation that supports the Met.

Primary Sidebar

About Judith H. Dobrzynski

Now an independent journalist, I've worked as a reporter in the culture and business sections of The New York Times, and been the editor of the Sunday business section and deputy business editor there as well as a senior editor of Business Week and the managing editor of CNBC, the cable TV

About Real Clear Arts

This blog is about culture in America as seen through my lens, which is informed and colored by years of reporting not only on the arts and humanities, but also on business, philanthropy, science, government and other subjects. I may break news, but more likely I will comment, provide

Archives