Feeling a little low? Ill even? Today Americans for the Arts announced and released its new National Arts Index, and you can see, the latest number isn’t good:
I have several times called on the arts community to produce better statistics — actual, accurate, relevant and up-to-date data (here, here, here and here, for example).
So I’m glad Americans for the Arts is trying something. It devised the National Arts Index by taking into account 76 “equal-weighted, national-level indicators of arts activity.” And the group says that makes it “one of the largest data sets about the arts industries ever assembled.” Americans for the Art intends to make this an annual measure; the first report covers the 11 years from 1998 to 2008.
Along with the index came a 21-page executive summary (here) and a 146-page full report (here). I haven’t had time to read them, but I do intend to look at, at least, the short version. What numbers, their source, and how they are used are important, obviously, and I’d like to know the answers.
Meantime, here are a few conclusions, verbatim:
The rest of that release is here.
Photo Credit: Americans For the Arts