About Last Night

Here’s my list of recommended Broadway and off-Broadway shows, updated weekly. In all cases, I gave these shows favorable reviews in The Wall Street Journal when they opened. For more information, click on the title.

Warning: Broadway shows marked with an asterisk were sold out, or nearly so, last week.

BROADWAY:

– Avenue Q (musical, R, adult subject matter and one show-stopping scene of puppet-on-puppet sex, reviewed here)

– A Chorus Line* (musical, PG-13/R, adult subject matter, reviewed here)

– Company* (musical, PG-13/R, adult subject matter and situations, reviewed here)

– The Drowsy Chaperone* (musical, G/PG-13, mild sexual content and a profusion of double entendres, reviewed here)

– The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee (musical, PG-13, mostly family-friendly but contains a smattering of strong language and a production number about an unwanted erection, reviewed here)

– The Vertical Hour* (drama, PG-13, adult subject matter, reviewed here, closes Apr. 1)

– Voyage (The Coast of Utopia, part 1)* (drama, G, too intellectually complex to be suitable for children of any age, reviewed here, extended through May 12)

OFF BROADWAY:

– The Fantasticks (musical, G, suitable for children old enough to enjoy a love story, reviewed here)

– Jacques Brel Is Alive and Well and Living In Paris (musical revue, R, adult subject matter and sexual content, reviewed here)

– Slava’s Snowshow (performance art, G, child-friendly, reviewed here, closes Jan. 14)

– Two Trains Running (drama, PG-13, adult subject matter, reviewed here, extended through Jan. 28)

CLOSING SUNDAY:

– Heartbreak House* (drama, G/PG-13, adult subject matter, reviewed here)

CLOSING SOON:

– The Wedding Singer (musical, PG-13, some sexual content, reviewed here, closes Dec. 31)

“An audience is never wrong. An individual member of it may be an imbecile, but a thousand imbeciles together in the dark–that is critical genius.”

Billy Wilder, interview, BBC2 (January 24, 1992)

“Friendship demands a religious treatment. We talk of choosing our friends, but friends are self-elected. Reverence is a great part of it.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson, Essays, First Series

“You know the story of the African Queen? I turned down an invitation to direct it because I couldn’t see any humor in the situation. It pleased me to see how they made it a comedy. There were some silly things in it, but it went. Whenever I hear a story my first thought is how to make it into a comedy, and I think of how to make it into a drama only as a last resort. Do you remember the story about the man who wanted to commit suicide and stayed on a window ledge–Fourteen Hours? They wanted me to do it, and I said no. ‘Why not?’ they asked me. ‘It’s a great story.’ I told them I didn’t like suicides, and I told my friend Henry Hathaway that I didn’t like the film he had directed. The public didn’t like it either, and Zanuck told me I had been right. I told Zanuck: ‘I might have done it if it had been Cary Grant getting from the bedroom of a woman whose husband had come back unexpectedly and after he was found on the ledge he pretended he was contemplating suicide.’ Zanuck asked me if I wanted to start on that one the next day.”

Howard Hawks, Cahiers du Cinema interview, 1956

On a bitterly cold night in Chicago, with traffic snarled up downtown and little reliable information emerging about a deadly office shooting that afternoon, could all but ten Chicagoans be forgiven for passing up the chance to see a sharp new print of Werner Herzog’s legendary Aguirre, the Wrath of God on one of the biggest movie screens in the city?

Sure, I absolve them. But I wouldn’t want to be one of them (though I very nearly was, begging tiredness at the end of a long work week until I came to my senses). And I’m still a little mystified that this event didn’t draw better in a city where off-the-beaten-path moviegoing has never struck me as a lonely enterprise.

The main theater at the Music Box is cavernous (seating 750), so the small size of the audience on this evening felt especially pronounced. It was a clash of scales not quite on a par with the incongruity on display in the beautiful and famous opening shot of Aguirre, but weirdly akin. In that awesome shot, a tiny long line of conquistadors and slaves make their way down a steep path in the Andes Mountains. The faraway perspective and the gauzy cloud cover lend this first image a serenity that will prove very short-lived.

The camera soon draws in and the hushed grandeur of the long view gives way to the jostling and weight of armor, equipment, pack animals, and the breathtakingly impractical sedan chair in which the wife of one explorer and daughter of another–each dressed in full floor-length finery–take turns being carried down the mountain. In a way the initial shift of perspective already pronounces the exploring party’s ill fate. As the Spanish descend from mountain to river basin, the camera from ethereal panorama to earthbound close-ups, Klaus Kinski’s Lope de Aguirre is on the verge of descent into a megalomaniacal madness under whose effects he’ll lead a branch of the main expedition down the Amazon to its doom.

This movie overwhelmed me. For one thing, all manner of estrangements converge in it: the viewer’s dramatic historical displacement from the action, which takes place in 1560-61; the characters’ similarly extreme geographical displacement in the Amazonian jungles; and, as their desperation and madness take hold, the increasingly hallucinatory quality of the experience represented. If the past is a foreign country, the plight of people living half a millennium ago as they try to fathom and tame an alien setting is doubly foreign and gripping.

Not that Herzog asks us to sympathize with the explorers–he’s very particular on the point that they’re motivated by the promise of conquest and wealth, and on the point of their cruelty in this pursuit. But even as the disasters multiply and bodies pile up (often seeming to have spontaneously sprouted an arrow that we didn’t see coming and didn’t see hit–the camerawork has an endearingly human, fallible character at these points, as if it’s not quite able to keep up with developments on the raft and from time to time turns an instant too late in a direction where it’s sensed something amiss or askew), some of the base intoxication of traversing an uncharted land stays in play. Even by the celebrated final scene of ruin–this film is bookended by justly famous shots whose visual power beggars description–that sense of awe persists and creates an identification between us and characters we may fear and despise.

At the end of Aguirre, when all of the worst has come to pass and Aguirre’s hubris has been paid for by dozens of men and all that’s left of ambition and wanderlust is a raft full of monkeys, there’s a small part of me that’s still in the grip of the opening shot–the pure wonder and beautiful incongruity and promise of it–and still wishes to be there, being amazed. (The more amazed if I try to put myself behind the eyes of someone who has not seen a hundred movies and a thousand pictures of the Amazon River and environs.) This gaping contradiction, I think, accounts for a great deal of the film’s power. It’s to some degree a contradiction between story and scene–sensually, the Peruvian landscape remains seductive to the very last gasp.

Beauty, wonder, dread, and yes, even its own wryly grim brand of humor: Aguirre is a thrilling thing. If you’re in Chicago, you still have a couple of nights to catch it. In other cities, keep an eye on the art houses.

Some largely unsuccessful Christmas shopping, as should soon become plain….

– Ah, the fine art of convincing yourself that someone on your list would like nothing more than to receive the very item that makes your own materialistic little heart skip a beat. This is all well and good if you come to your senses before presents are exchanged, keep the desired object for yourself (if I must), and venture out again in time to find something more apropos. Or if, like me and Terry, your target’s taste and your own largely converge and you have a track record of successfully exchanging enthusiasms. If you could see at once all of the fabulous presents I’ve ever received from Terry, you would know in a flash who had given them. They positively shout Terry, and by now they whisper Laura too.

– A super-trivial matter, but I do not like movie editions of novels and avoid them whenever possible. I suppose they are good for book sales, and I suppose this is insupportable snobbish purism on my part, but a picture of Nicole Kidman on a book cover, for me, degrades the book’s bookiness. It robs the object of its own integrity, turning it into an advertisement for a separate, and often unrelated and lesser, thing. Yes, I am someone who inordinately prizes books as objects, why do you ask? During the summer I caught the early trailers for the upcoming P.D. James-based Children of Men and picked up a copy in the nick of time–the new editions festooned with Clive Owen’s lovely but transient mug apparently didn’t hit stores until this month. (For the record, I liked what I read of the book, got off track with it, but plan to return to it following more pressing reading projects).

– Thanks to space constraints and uncertain dedication, I’ve never started a DVD library in earnest. But I had a blast last weekend at the local Tower Records going-out-of-business sale. The pickings were slim, but that only served to heighten the fun of painstakingly panning for DVD gold. (I spent all of my allotted time in the movie section, never getting around to scanning the CDs, which were even more deeply discounted.) My efforts didn’t go unrewarded. I gave a happy start when the title of one of my favorite films, Kicking and Screaming, popped out, but of course, alas, it was not the twenty-something-slacker flick but the naught-something-soccer flick that was available. Silly, really, to think I’d find anything from the Criterion Collection here, but hope does spring recklessly. In the next row, however, a single copy of Mr. Jealousy, Noah Baumbach’s follow-up feature to Kicking, as of yet unseen by me, surfaced as if in slight compensation for the false alarm. Don’t worry–I don’t expect it to be good or anything! But I doubt it’s devoid of merit, either, and for only $6 I’ll satisfy a longstanding curiosity. By the end of the hunt, I held five DVDs: Mr. Jealousy, the Robert Towne-directed Tequila Sunrise, John Sayles’s Sunshine State, the 1969 Faulkner-based Reivers, and a favorite from last year, Red Eye. Could the demise of Tower Records mean the (modest, eclectic, uneven) beginning of the movie library I’d previously only desultorily contemplated? People on whose Christmas shopping lists I appear, take note!

David King and Ethan Iverson of the Bad Plus are circulating a musician questionnaire whose results are being posted on their blog. If you’re curious, go here and start scrolling down to see the replies, which are pouring in.

Needless to say, I’m strictly a recovering musician, but I found the questions (and answers) so fascinating that I decided to play as well.

* * *

Give us an example or two of an especially good or interesting:

Movie score. Chinatown, Election, Sunset Boulevard.

TV theme. The Dick Van Dyke Show, The Equalizer, Miami Vice. (I also love “Woke Up This Morning,” the A3 song used as the theme to The Sopranos.)

Melody. Standards: “Autumn in New York,” “The Bad and the Beautiful,” “Lucky to Be Me,” “One for My Baby.” Classical: Bach’s chorale prelude on “Schm

– My Wall Street Journal column about the dance bust stirred up a fair amount of talk, most of it favorable and some of it from unexpected quarters. (Much to my surprise, for instance, the Little Professor commented on it at length.)

It also brought me an e-mail from a reader of “About Last Night” who showed the column to his cousin, who in turn wrote back as follows:

Thank you for forwarding this. Yes, he’s quite right–lots of the
companies I loved in my ballet-filled youth are gone, and all those
little girls taking ballet class have grown up to raise daughters who
take soccer and softball. I expect that the vast improvement in
after-school options for strong, athletically inclined girls is
actually all to the good; lots of talentless kids are no longer
clumping around in leotards. But I do miss the exciting froth of new
little companies putting on performances on a shoestring. In my
Chicago years I (briefly) did fund-raising and audience development for
the company which became the Chicago City Ballet, and I was so
impressed by the determination of these young people who had so little
common sense and so much passion for dance….

I love that last line. I’m not an idealist–life has made me fairly hard-headed–but I’m well aware that many, perhaps most of the great things that get done in this world, especially in the realm of art, are done by people with no common sense whatsoever. George Bernard Shaw described the Julius Caesar of his play Caesar and Cleopatra as “a man of great common sense and good taste–meaning thereby a man without originality or moral courage.”

Of course it’s more complicated than that, but those who (like me) lack a poetic streak should always be wary of condescending to those who don’t. If George Balanchine and Lincoln Kirstein had had any common sense, they wouldn’t have founded New York City Ballet.

– A reader writes, apropos of this posting:

Your posting brought to mind a winter night in Minneapolis more than forty years ago. While most people like to just lie still and savor the mood afterwards, this girl often felt like dancing. I can still remember her dancing naked in the moonlight coming in through the picture window of my apartment. The music? Smetana’s Moldau. So long ago, but so vivid!

Somehow that memory reminds me of this.