• Home
  • About
    • About Last Night
    • Terry Teachout
    • Contact
  • AJBlogCentral
  • ArtsJournal

About Last Night

Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City

You are here: Home / 2014 / January / Archives for 17th

Archives for January 17, 2014

TT: Halfway to greatness

January 17, 2014 by Terry Teachout

I review three New York shows in today’s Wall Street Journal, Frank Langella’s King Lear, the Broadway revival of Sophie Treadwell’s Machinal, and Beautiful: The Carole King Musical. Here’s an excerpt.

* * *

Frank Langella is a stage actor of immense charisma and potency, and King Lear is the role to which all such men aspire as they grow older and confront the prospect of their coming demise. So it makes perfect sense that Mr. Langella, who turned 76 earlier this month, should have chosen to take it on. But even though he once played the part of William Shakespeare in William Gibson’s “A Cry of Players,” Mr. Langella has done surprisingly little Shakespearean acting, nor is he especially well known as a classical actor. Indeed, he confesses to never even having read “King Lear” (which is quite a thing for a distinguished stage actor to admit) before agreeing to star in Angus Jackson’s production, which has transferred to BAM Harvey after a run at England’s Chichester Festival. So what can be reasonably expected out of him, and what does he deliver?

Frank_Langella_lea_2729678b.jpgThroughout most of the first half of the evening, Mr. Langella gives us an old-fashioned star-turn Lear: big, blustering, monochromatic and deaf to the tolling of Shakespeare’s verse. Imposing, yes–he has the rafter-raising voice to play a king–but not compelling, even though the production is structured to show him off. (He’s actually introduced with a clap-for-the-star fanfare.) But then, like Ian McKellen and Christopher Plummer before him, he finds his footing when he renounces his throne and sees for the first time the world as it really is, cold and hostile to the vanity of human wishes. “Is man no more than this?” he cries at the piteous spectacle of the half-naked Edgar (Sebastian Armesto) trembling in the storm, and in an instant he is invaded and conquered by self-doubt. Thereafter Mr. Langella is a great Lear, gaunt, hushed and human….

Inspired, as was James M. Cain’s “Double Indemnity,” by a once-celebrated, now-forgotten murder trial of the Roaring ’20s, “Machinal” tells the story of a sensitive but inarticulate stenographer (Rebecca Hall) who marries her boss (Michael Cumpsty), then murders him after taking a lover (Morgan Spector) and learning that her spirit has been crushed by the soullessness of life under industrial capitalism. That is, to put it mildly, an oft-told tale, and the quaint expressionist idiom in which it is told here is far more familiar today than it was in 1928. Indeed, the staccato I-am-a-dehumanized-robot clichés spouted by Ms. Treadwell’s characters suggest at times a “Saturday Night Live” parody of an Aaron Sorkin sitcom: “She doesn’t belong in an office.” “Who does?” “I do!” “You said it!” “Hot dog!”

What brings this “Machinal” to life is the acting. Ms. Hall, a British stage actor who is best known to American audiences for her glowing performance in Ben Affleck’s “The Town,” is so unselfconsciously winning that you can’t help but warm to her plight….

tn-500_bwwbeautifulwm011131869.jpgJessie Mueller is surely destined for musical-comedy stardom. Not only is she the best singer to hit Broadway since Kelli O’Hara, but she’s also an accomplished actor, and “Beautiful: The Carole King Musical,” in which she plays the title role, allows her to display both sides of her exceptional talent. The problem is that what she does in “Beautiful” is a cross between a superlative piece of character acting and an impersonation–a creative and affecting one, to be sure, but an impersonation all the same. Close your eyes and you’ll think you’re hearing Ms. King’s own plaintive, nasal singing voice. Open them and you’ll see a shy Brooklyn housewife who becomes a successful singer-songwriter almost in spite of herself, which is by all accounts what Ms. King was in real life. It’s a totally persuasive performance that serves the show unselfishly, but most people who see it will likely come away thinking of Ms. King, not Ms. Mueller, which isn’t how stars are born.

As for “Beautiful” itself, it’s a staged biopic whose sitcommish book (written by Douglas McGrath) is the merest of pretexts for the singing of two dozen pop hits from the ’60s and early ’70s. Most of them were penned by Ms. King and Gerry Goffin, her lyricist when they were married to one another, and most are amiable Top-40 confections like “The Locomotion” and “One Fine Day.” Ms. King, however, was a truly gifted tunesmith, and some of the numbers in the show, “It’s Too Late,” “Up on the Roof” and “Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow” in particular, are excellent by any possible standard….

* * *

Read the whole thing here.

TT: What do you know?

January 17, 2014 by Terry Teachout

In today’s Wall Street Journal “Sightings” column I hold forth on the problems faced by the drama critic who is called upon to review stage adaptations of familiar source material. Here’s an excerpt.

* * *

MV5BNzQ5ODE4NTcxNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjkyNDQ0MDE%40._V1_SX214_.jpgAfter the film version of Tracy Letts’ “August: Osage County” came out last month, it soon emerged that most of the critics who reviewed it hadn’t seen the play. (Not so my esteemed colleague Joe Morgenstern, who saw it on Broadway and made good use of the experience in writing his piece.) The result was a Twitter spat in which exasperated theater people argued that it wasn’t responsible to review a screen adaptation of so important a play without having seen the original version.

I haven’t seen the film version yet, though I will as soon as I can. For now, though, I don’t have a horse in that particular race. Instead, I’d like to approach the question from the opposite direction. What about drama critics who find themselves called on, as is often the case, to review a show adapted from a pre-existing piece of source material–a novel or, in the case of musicals, a movie–or based on a true story? How much, if anything, must they know to do the job right? It’s tempting to say that it depends on how serious the show is. I’m not at all sure that my review of “Legally Blonde: The Musical” was any better because I’d seen the movie. But even in the case of a commodity musical, it’s not quite as simple as that….

160px-Amadeus_Playbill.jpgFor me, Peter Shaffer’s “Amadeus,” a play about the rivalry between Antonio Salieri and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart that was first staged in 1979 and later turned into a popular film by Milos Forman, is the ideal test case. You don’t have to see the play to appreciate the movie, which was skillfully adapted by Mr. Shaffer himself. Nor is it necessary to know anything about Mozart or Salieri to enjoy either version of “Amadeus.” The script tells you all you need to know (though quite a bit of the “information” in “Amadeus” is untrue, which definitely makes the reviewer’s job more interesting). But a drama critic who reviews a revival of “Amadeus” must know something about Mozart’s life and work in order to properly appreciate the play, which is a gripping parable of the terrible mystery of human inequality as seen in the complex relationship between Mozart and Salieri. What’s more, he really ought to have seen the film, too, since nearly everybody knows it far better than the play…

* * *

Read the whole thing here.

Paul Scofield plays Salieri in a scene from the original stage production of Amadeus:

F. Murray Abraham plays Salieri in the corresponding scene from the film version of Amadeus:

TT: Almanac

January 17, 2014 by Terry Teachout

“In general, when reading a scholarly critic, one profits more from his quotations than from his comments.”
W.H. Auden, “Reading” (in The Dyer’s Hand)

Terry Teachout

Terry Teachout, who writes this blog, is the drama critic of The Wall Street Journal and the critic-at-large of Commentary. In addition to his Wall Street Journal drama column and his monthly essays … [Read More...]

About

About “About Last Night”

This is a blog about the arts in New York City and the rest of America, written by Terry Teachout. Terry is a critic, biographer, playwright, director, librettist, recovering musician, and inveterate blogger. In addition to theater, he writes here and elsewhere about all of the other arts--books, … [Read More...]

About My Plays and Opera Libretti

Billy and Me, my second play, received its world premiere on December 8, 2017, at Palm Beach Dramaworks in West Palm Beach, Fla. Satchmo at the Waldorf, my first play, closed off Broadway at the Westside Theatre on June 29, 2014, after 18 previews and 136 performances. That production was directed … [Read More...]

About My Podcast

Peter Marks, Elisabeth Vincentelli, and I are the panelists on “Three on the Aisle,” a bimonthly podcast from New York about theater in America. … [Read More...]

About My Books

My latest book is Duke: A Life of Duke Ellington, published in 2013 by Gotham Books in the U.S. and the Robson Press in England and now available in paperback. I have also written biographies of Louis Armstrong, George Balanchine, and H.L. Mencken, as well as a volume of my collected essays called A … [Read More...]

The Long Goodbye

To read all three installments of "The Long Goodbye," a multi-part posting about the experience of watching a parent die, go here. … [Read More...]

Follow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail

@Terryteachout1

Tweets by TerryTeachout1

Archives

January 2014
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Dec   Feb »

An ArtsJournal Blog

Recent Posts

  • Lookback: “Call me Bartleby”
  • Almanac: Thomas Fuller on memory
  • Just because: Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli plays Ravel
  • Almanac: Jean Anouilh on beauty
  • The pandemic process

Copyright © 2021 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in