The Tacoma Art Museum has resolved its dispute with the Young family. They are the descendants of the couple who had donated a collection of Qing dynasty items to the museum, which — because the museum had changed its mission — no longer fit in the collection. I wrote about the case the other day, and I did not believe the museum had handled it well.
I still don’t; moreover, the press release from Tacoma that was just sent to me about the resolution does not make clear exactly what happened.
It says, in part:
The Young family has agreed to dismiss its lawsuit against Tacoma Art Museum.
“We regret that the conversation between us, the museum, and the community took the direction that it did,” said Al Young. “We appreciate the museum hearing our concerns and we will work together to address them. We believe the museum’s increased emphasis on the work of Chinese American artists of the Northwest will fulfill our parents’ intentions.”
Tacoma Art Museum plans to continue with the second phase of the auction on March 12. It has decided to withdraw a few works that will be donated to an appropriate Northwest institution in the near future. As was always intended and relayed to the Young family, the museum will take some of the funds from the auction to purchase works by Chinese American artists and will give credit to the Youngs for their donation.
So, probably, the choicest items in the original donation will be kept in public institutions, which is good, and the Youngs will be named as donors on the new art acquired with the money raised from the auction. Both of those are good things, and go some way toward rectifying the orignal mistake.

Recent Comments
Kit on British Art Tours In China: Cushion Or Couch?
I don't know the financial details, but a primary purpose of such UK tours is not financial gain, but rather...Louis Torres on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I would respond to Chris Hampton's comment if I could make any sense of it, especially the part immediately following...Mary L. Bullock on Constable’s Salisbury Cathedral “Saved for the Nation” — But How?
You are right to be concerned. Every time you move a work of art something happens, no matter how...Mike Nicholson on British Art Tours In China: Cushion Or Couch?
It's worth remembering that touring art is nothing new - not not necessarily destructive. In 2011 Tate Britain displayed...James Russell on So What Are The 50 Best “Galleries” In the World?
Thanks for noting this. The link is dead though. I found it here: http://britishart.yale.edu/sites/default/files/YCBA_Top-50_London-Times_0.pdf. I'm bummed my hometown museums -- the...Jim VanKirk on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I should be very careful endowing Warhol with such high mindedness. There is documentary evidence on at least 2 occasions...Judith H. Dobrzynski on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I think it's Mr. not Ms.chris hampton on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, although i must admit to be rather surprised that an editor of a 'magazine'...Louis Torres on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
“Must reading” if you own a Warhol or plan to. If not, Dorment’s complex tale is just one big yawn,...Jim VanKirk on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
"Oh! What a tangled web we weave When first we practice to deceive!" Walter Scott