We can quarrel with MoMA’s video game escapade, but everyone’s got to agree that the illuminated manuscript acquired by the Getty museum today is a masterpiece and a beauty. And it makes perfect sense for the Getty’s collection.
The Roman de Gillion de Trazegnies, by Lieven van Lathem (1430–1493), was purchased at Sotheby’s today for nearly $6.2 million. Van Lathem is considered to be the most accomplished painter of secular scenes in the golden era of Flemish manuscript illumination, the museum said.
The manuscript consists of ”eight brilliantly painted half-page miniatures and forty-four historiated initials” and, as the book was rarely copied. this “romance appears in only three other manuscripts.” The work had been lent to the Getty Museum for its beautiful 2003 exhibition titled Illuminating the Renaissance.
According to the Getty’s press release:
The only documented manuscript by Lieven van Lathem, the Prayer Book of Charles the Bold, is already in the Getty Museum’s permanent collection, having been acquired in 1989. This primary work provides the basis for all other Van Lathem attributions. The Roman de Gillion de Trazegnies is regarded as the artist’s preeminent secular work, and this acquisition represents an unrivalled opportunity to unite masterpieces of both secular and devotional illumination by Van Lathem in a single collection.
While this announcement was being made by Timothy Potts, director of the J. Paul Getty Museum, late of the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cambridge, his replacement was being announced there: it’s Timothy Knox (right), currently the director of Sir John Soane’s Museum* in London. I was just there, and Knox has done a wonderful job of restoring that gem — and I’m far from alone in thinking that.
Photo Credits: Courtesy of the Getty (top) and the Soane Museum (bottom)
*I consult to a Foundation that supports the Soane

Recent Comments
Kit on British Art Tours In China: Cushion Or Couch?
I don't know the financial details, but a primary purpose of such UK tours is not financial gain, but rather...Louis Torres on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I would respond to Chris Hampton's comment if I could make any sense of it, especially the part immediately following...Mary L. Bullock on Constable’s Salisbury Cathedral “Saved for the Nation” — But How?
You are right to be concerned. Every time you move a work of art something happens, no matter how...Mike Nicholson on British Art Tours In China: Cushion Or Couch?
It's worth remembering that touring art is nothing new - not not necessarily destructive. In 2011 Tate Britain displayed...James Russell on So What Are The 50 Best “Galleries” In the World?
Thanks for noting this. The link is dead though. I found it here: http://britishart.yale.edu/sites/default/files/YCBA_Top-50_London-Times_0.pdf. I'm bummed my hometown museums -- the...Jim VanKirk on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I should be very careful endowing Warhol with such high mindedness. There is documentary evidence on at least 2 occasions...Judith H. Dobrzynski on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I think it's Mr. not Ms.chris hampton on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, although i must admit to be rather surprised that an editor of a 'magazine'...Louis Torres on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
“Must reading” if you own a Warhol or plan to. If not, Dorment’s complex tale is just one big yawn,...Jim VanKirk on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
"Oh! What a tangled web we weave When first we practice to deceive!" Walter Scott