A press release from the Dallas Museum of Art sent me to the website of the National Endowment for the Arts the other day, to see what merited money in the recently announced Access to Artistic Excellence awards. In them, plenty of museums received money for a variety of activities, including the Chrysler Museum, to catalogue its glass collection, and the Montclair Art Museum, to help digitize its permanent collection. Dallas got $85,000 to support its exhibition archives resources online.
But it was the earlier round of grants that proved to be more interesting. They show how the NEA actually is giving more money to individual artists — as filtered through artists’ communities and residencies.
You’ll recall that NEA chief Rocco Landesman has said he wants to restore awards to artists, which were lost in the ’90s culture wars and are unlikely to be resurrected any time soon. But a few years ago, the NEA also created a category ot Access to Artistic Excellence awards specifically for “Artist Communitites” like the MacDowell Colony and Yaddo and many more. Previously, artist communities could apply for NEA money, but they did not have a category of their own.
There have now been two rounds of grants in this category. Last year, NEA gave 26 awards in this category totalling $575,000. The grants ranged from $10,000 to $35,000, assuming I counted and added properly.
This year, the NEA gave 25 awards in this category totalling $610,000. The grants ranged from $10,000 to $50,000.
I’m guessing a bit here, because there’s no easy way to search for previous grants to artist communities, bit I think that have done better than they used to. And – I postulate — because it’s at least partly because these awards are a backhanded way for Landemann to get money to individual artists.

Recent Comments
Kit on British Art Tours In China: Cushion Or Couch?
I don't know the financial details, but a primary purpose of such UK tours is not financial gain, but rather...Louis Torres on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I would respond to Chris Hampton's comment if I could make any sense of it, especially the part immediately following...Mary L. Bullock on Constable’s Salisbury Cathedral “Saved for the Nation” — But How?
You are right to be concerned. Every time you move a work of art something happens, no matter how...Mike Nicholson on British Art Tours In China: Cushion Or Couch?
It's worth remembering that touring art is nothing new - not not necessarily destructive. In 2011 Tate Britain displayed...James Russell on So What Are The 50 Best “Galleries” In the World?
Thanks for noting this. The link is dead though. I found it here: http://britishart.yale.edu/sites/default/files/YCBA_Top-50_London-Times_0.pdf. I'm bummed my hometown museums -- the...Jim VanKirk on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I should be very careful endowing Warhol with such high mindedness. There is documentary evidence on at least 2 occasions...Judith H. Dobrzynski on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
I think it's Mr. not Ms.chris hampton on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, although i must admit to be rather surprised that an editor of a 'magazine'...Louis Torres on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
“Must reading” if you own a Warhol or plan to. If not, Dorment’s complex tale is just one big yawn,...Jim VanKirk on The Absolute Mess In Warhol Matters
"Oh! What a tangled web we weave When first we practice to deceive!" Walter Scott