Academie d’Underrated: Matthijs Vermeulen

[Update below] I’ve been intending to write more about my European sabbatical, but I’m rather frantically composing on deadline. I have five world premieres coming up in the next several months, and two of the pieces aren’t finished. Thanks to my extended leave from teaching, I wrote seven works in 2007, totaling some 85 minutes of music – not much by some people’s standards, but a personal record for me. And I have two movements of The Planets to finish before school starts, so that the Relache ensemble can start practicing the entire 75-minute, ten-movement work – my own Turangalila, I like to think of it as – for their performance in Delaware in May. Also, my European trip was a lot to process: seven countries in eleven weeks, giving six concerts and ten lectures, meeting lots of composers, and hearing tons of new music. Unlike the American businessmen in novels, every American artist goes to Europe hoping to be changed. I’m not sure I was, but I did need time to think about it.

Vermeulen.jpgWhat I can do, though, is tell you about the most astonishing composer I learned about there: Matthijs Vermeulen. The Dutch call Vermeulen (1888-1967) “the Charles Ives of Holland,” and also their Varèse. He is the archetypal undiscovered composer. His Second Symphony – considered by many his most groundbreaking work (second page pictured below) – received its first performance in 1953, and Vermeulen himself first heard it in 1956. He had written it in 1920. The tone clusters, polyrhythms, percussion, and atonal counterpoint it opens with are easily as daring as anything Varèse would write in the next decade. To throw yet another comparison in, the Dutch refer to it as “the Dutch Sacre du Printemps.” Curiously modest about promoting their national composers, they won’t tell you anything about Vermeulen unless pressed, but if you mention how remarkable he was, they look proud as punch.

Vermeulen2-2.jpg

On top of the fact that he was decades ahead of his time, Vermeulen was just my kind of guy. Autodidact and too poor to buy concert tickets, he learned the repertoire by listening to orchestras play from outside the Concertgebouw, sitting in the garden. He found work as a music critic, one whose sharp and outspoken views earned him enemies and injured his chances for performance. (My apartment in Amsterdam was about six blocks from the Concertgebouw. After romanticizing the place for my entire life, I was pretty let down to find that it simply translates as “Concert Building.”)

The most famous incident of Vermeulen’s life, the one every commentator mentions, occurred while he was working as a critic in November of 1918. Following a performance at the Concertgebouw of the Seventh Symphony of the rather conservative Dutch composer Cornelius Dopper, Vermeulen, to express his contempt, yelled “Long live Sousa!” – by which he meant that even the little-respected John Philip Sousa was a better composer than Dopper. Much of the audience understood him, however, to have shouted “Long live Troelstra!”, which was the name of a socialist revolutionary who had attempted to start an uprising only days before. For awhile Vermeulen was banned from the Concertgebouw by the orchestra’s management. Unable to make a living in Amsterdam, he moved to Paris for a 25-year exile, eking out a living as a music journalist and travel writer. You can see why my heart goes out to the guy. I have a feeling Vermeulen and I would have been thick as thieves.

After World War II, and the war-related deaths of his wife and son, Vermeulen moved back to Amsterdam, and his works started to be heard. There is a “Complete Matthijs Vermeulen Edition” of his recordings on two three-CD sets on Donemus, sold in every record store in Amsterdam but rather difficult to locate on internet retail outlets. His twenty-odd works are easily listed:

Symphonies:

No. 1, “Symphonia carminum” (1912-14)

No. 2, “Prelude à la nouvelle journée” (1919-20)

No. 3, “Thrène et Péan” (1921-22)

No. 4, “Les victoires” (1940-41)

No. 5, “Les lendemains chantants” (1941-5)

No. 6, “Les minutes heureuses” (1956-8)

No. 7, “Dithyrambes pour les temps à venir” (1963-5)

Chamber music:

Cello Sonata No. 1 (1918)

String Trio (1923)

Violin Sonata (1924)

Cello Sonata No. 2 (1938)

String Quartet (1960-61)

Songs with piano:

On ne passe pas (1917)

The Soldier (1917)

Les filles du roi d’Espagne (1917)

Le veille (1917; also in orchestral version of 1932)

Trois salutations à Notre Dame (1941)

Le balcon (1944)

Preludes des origines (1959)

Trois chants d’amour (1962)

Other:

Symphonic Prologue, Passacaglia, Cortège, and Interlude to The Flying Dutchman (1930)

That’s it: Vermeulen’s life’s work. The symphonies – only the Fifth of which is divided into movements – are amazing. All of his music is tremendously contrapuntal, with many lines competing in a vast rhythmic heterophony. Throughout his life he complained that musicians who looked at his scores warned that the music would never sound, but that no one would play it to prove the point – and when he finally heard his works, they sounded just the way he wanted. He flows back and forth across the threshhold of tonality and atonality, occasionally sounding like Ives or Ruggles depending, though really sounding very much like himself. One of his most lovely and characteristic effects is the atonal (or dissonant) background ostinato, over which lengthy melodies unfold. It’s complex music, difficult to become familiar with, but not at all without personality. In weight and density one might compare the symphonies to those of Karl Amadeus Hartmann, although they are not nearly so complicated in form as Hartmann’s, and easier to take in as a whole.

I was directed to Vermeulen by a casual comment from Anthony Fiumara, director of the Orkest de Volharding. The name was totally unknown to me. I would have never believed that I, lifelong connoisseur of obscure composers, someone who teaches Berwald and Dussek in the classroom, would discover, at 51, a major composer I had never heard of, let alone one who would quickly become one of my favorites. At Donemus I bought the scores to the Second, Third, and Sixth Symphonies. It turns out that my erstwhile Fanfare magazine colleague Paul Rapoport wrote a book titled Six Composers from Northern Europe, about Vermeulen, Vagn Holmboe, Havergal Brian, Allan Pettersson, Fartein Valen, and Kaikhosru Sorabji, which remains one of the fuller treatments of Vermeulen in English; the one existing biography is only in Dutch. And since I hate to tell you about any music you can’t hear, I upload Vermeulen’s Third Symphony for your listening pleasure. Keep in mind it was completed in 1922. It’s amazing what you can reach your fifties without knowing, but delightful to realize how much left there is to learn.

UPDATE: I found an insightful and thorough article on Vermeulen here.

Related
Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on RedditEmail this to someone

Comments

  1. says

    Thanks Kyle—it’s going on my iPod very shortly and from what I’ve listened to so far on my iBook, this is really nice stuff. I’d love to hear his other music. I recall many many years ago seeing something from Edition Donemus that was pretty avant garde, but I don’t think it was by Vermeulen, but who knows (this was probably over 30 years ago).

    In terms of discovering new composers, I’m still doing that, and it’s part of the fun of all this. Thanks for making this happen by sharing some great information and music.

  2. says

    “Curiously modest about promoting their national composers, they won’t tell you anything about Vermeulen unless pressed, but if you mention how remarkable he was, they look proud as punch.”
    Actually, Dutch cultural politics works just slightly differently. As a somewhat small culture with a very cosmopolitan position due to a relatively important position in world trade and an extensive colonial past, the Dutch feel a constant necessity to prove their worth to the world. This is however always to be accomplished by promoting its contemporary culture. For a small country, we have great composers, we have great graphic designers, we have a vibrant literature, etc. etc. The operative slogan, which I feel is the cornerstone of Dutch national sense, is “waar een klein land groot in kan zijn” – referring to things “in which a small country can be great”. This formula is a perfect symbol for the typically Dutch form of quasi-modest national pride.
    At the same time, however, the cosmopolitan openness to what happens in other countries makes the Dutch very unsure of their own cultural tradition. What is Dutch music history when you have all those Germans and Austrians sitting next door pulling off one work of genius after another? What could Dutch literature ever be with Proust just south of you, Shakespeare just west of you, Goethe one step to the east?
    The two tendencies interestingly reinforce one another. The less we trust our own tradition, the more we stress the vitality of our current artistic situation. And so every generation promotes its own official subsidized artists and neglects its past. The contemporary gets to be overvalued to the same degree that the past gets to be undervalued. (I’d love to be able to claim that I’m not guilty of this, but looking at the music I listen to most and the books I read most, I think I don’t entirely escape this picture)
    Vermeulen must be exceptional, in that he really was somewhat of a maverick, which is extremely rare in our society, which is vastly more conservative and conformist than many people realise, particularly our music life with its huge investment in expensive institutions. The major composer of his period was considered to be Willem Pijper at the time; he was thought to have developed a radical new technique, “germ cell technique”, but what I know of his work now strikes me as competent at best.

  3. says

    To add to this, I think the one big exception is painting – the Dutch Masters of the Golden Age are a source of national pride as much as they are loved all over the world. Interestingly, the greatest Dutch painters after the 18th century all had to leave the country sooner or later – Van Gogh, Mondrian, De Kooning. Which reminds me again of a particularly caustic remark by our local German curmudgeon composer and a strong polemicist, Konrad Boehmer, who defined a Dutch composer as “A composer who either comes from abroad, or moves there.” – sure enough, Vermeulen fits the bill!

  4. Peter Schat says

    One interesting thing about that collection is that some of the performances go back quite a few years (you see names like Ernest Bour among the conductors) and I believe most or all were at one time issued for broadcast, courtesy of Radio Nederland. WKCR-FM in New York used to broadcast these Holland Festival programs. I especially remember the Second Symphony being aired, as it was the most surprisingly prescient thing this side of Langgaard’s Music of the Spheres.

  5. Peter Schat says

    FWIW, the Chandos disk of Vermeulen’s Symphonies 2, 6 and 7, is available through HMV Japan (a place to find many classical cds that are no longer available here) for about $20.
    KG replies: That’s the first one I bought, and was so impressed that I went back the same day to get the complete edition.

  6. says

    Greetings, and Happy New Year. This might not be fun to hear, given how difficult it is to find Vermuelen’s music in the States these days, but if you worked at a radio station in the 1980s the Dutch consulate in the U.S. would send you pretty much anything you requested. I worked for WAIF in Cincinnati, a community station, and that’s how I heard some of Louis Andriessen’s music for the first time; just asking the Dutch consulate to send it. We got the two Vermeuelen sets in the summer of ’86 and I had played basically all of the music, at one time or another, on Cincinnati radio by the summer of ’87. I particularly like some of the chamber music – the Sonata for violin and piano and the song settting “Le balcon,” and also the Fifth Symphony. There is something unique about Vermuelen’s approach to architecture and formal development; he was a very, very patient composer.
    KG replies: When Donemus was putting out CDs, they sent me all their releases because I was a critic (though never the Vermeulen, oddly). The Dutch don’t brag about their composers, but they do an impressive job of making the music available.

  7. Paul Rapoport says

    I’m glad you discovered the visionary MV, and thanks for the mention of my article about him from 1978. It’s a bit out of date now (and has a few wrong pieces of information); there was a good thesis about him 11 years ago by Ton Braas, but it is of course in Dutch. One of Vermeulen’s own books is in French.

    Thanks too for all your work. I remember with some fondness, among much else, your exegesis many years ago of the “secret” tuning in La Monte Young’s Well-Tuned Piano.
    KG replies: Hi Paul, nice to hear from you. I thought this might reel you in eventually.