This post by one E. Fulton on the Salon.com chat pages is making the rounds, and worth it:
Conservatives omit several important words in their whining about being oppressed, so in order to understand them you have to add those skipped words back in. For example:
Liberals are against people of faith forcing their faith on other people and intruding on the constitutional notion of religious freedom for all people.
Conservatives can’t say anything openly offensive to minority groups, factually incorrect, and otherwise lacking any substance these days without hearing other people say that hate-filled and meritless comments are inappropriate, which is really just more speech, not a limit on anyone’s free speech at all, and having to hide behind some faux-rebel posture by claiming victimization from non-existent political correctness being “forced“ on them.
We have to use wedge issues to spark a fight to distract from our inability to create sound economic, social or foreign policies and preserve our political dominance among people for whom morals is an easy shorthand for “homophobia,” and we hope that our family members and staff won’t expose our hypocrisy and lack of integrity, so that we can lie about doing things we say we’re against and continue our craven approach to the attacks by us against homosexuals and liberals, whose behavior is no more immoral than ours, but our agenda is more important, because it gives us power, even if our use of it will ruin our country.
Christians are most assuredly not the most persecuted group in the country, and what we want to do with liberals is to claim their call for social justice by making sure that we keep harping on false claims that no one can say “Merry Christmas” and insisting on inappropriate and sacriligious uses of our own religious iconography to force the prohibiting of any religious display by government entities, which we know shouldn’t be displaying religious messages anyway.
See? They’re really just using a shorthand that makes interpreting their messages a little trickier, but once you see what’s not being said in context, it makes perfect, if Machiavellian and totalitarian, sense.

Recent Comments
John Halle on Saving Music from False Consciousness
As Kyle mentions, the piece deals mostly with the 1930s cultural front and its legacy. Politicized classical music of...Kraig Grady on Saving Music from False Consciousness
no mention of Frederic Rzewski?robert on Fitting Homage
Thanks a lot Doug; I'll definitely give them a try.Doug Skinner on Fitting Homage
Here it is: Debenham Media Group, in Pittsburgh; at MyMovieTransfer.com. They can do both regular and super 8 sound....John Halle on Saving Music from False Consciousness
Thanks a lot, Kyle for linking to this. I haven't set up my site to take comments so if anyone...Doug Skinner on End of the World 7.0
It's time to be seduced into carpentry! KG replies: Carpentry would never recover.Doug Skinner on Fitting Homage
Robert -- A friend of mine is helping me with this. He has the info; I'll pass it on as...James Pritchett on End of the World 7.0
Kyle, virtualization is your friend here. I made the jump from Windows to Mac a year or so ago. ...Ian Stewart on End of the World 7.0
I only use Macs (as does my wife) and I have to say that the improvements in the Mac OS...dtoub on End of the World 7.0
Kyle, I beta-tested Lion, Mountain Lion and now 10.9. All my music software (Finale, Reason 4.0.3, Fission, Audacity, etc) has...