Measuring Your Orchestra's Success in Fund Raising

"How do I know my orchestra is achieving its potential in fund raising?" I hear this question a lot--from musicians, from board members, from administrative staff. It's a very complicated question, one that is likely to become even more important in these difficult economic times. And it's a question that can become critical when an orchestra is going through a difficult labor negotiation, perhaps asking for musician concessions and making the claim that "we are raising all the money we can raise in this community." At certain times in certain places, that claim may be true, or very close to true. At other times and in other places, it may be unjustified. But how does any observer, even an involved observer inside the organization, know?  Fund raising is vague, squishy, hard to get a handle on--harder to judge than earned income, where there are empty seats to tell you what your potential might be in ticket sales. 
There is, in fact, no perfect answer to how much money an orchestra can raise; one can probably never know with a final degree of precision and confidence. But there are ways to make a reasonable assessment, and for those interested I'd like to suggest an approach to doing that.

The first step is to develop an internal consensus on what your "peer" orchestras are. It certainly isn't determined by budget size alone, though that is one component. Demographics, societal makeup, and economic level of the community are all factors. So is the size of your metropolitan area, not just of your city. (When I did some work with the Houston Symphony some years ago, Houston was the fourth largest city in the United States, but had the fifteenth largest metropolitan area; the latter was a more relevant comparison.) What is the competition? Is yours the only orchestra within a one-hour drive, or are there several?  You must weigh all of these factors, and then come up with a list of approximately a half dozen or so orchestras to which it makes sense to compare yours. You might start out with a larger list, because the next step is to remove from the list any orchestras that have experienced serious financial problems for an extended period of time. You do not want to establish benchmarks that include, to put it bluntly, those who are failing. 

When you have settled on those peer orchestras, it is time to ask them some questions. One of the great things about the orchestra field is that we all try to help each other--so you will probably get answers, particularly if you offer to share the results with all who respond. Generally it might be the chief development officer or executive director who asks her peer, but it could be a board chair as well. The questions will establish a range with which you can compare your own orchestra's performance, and perhaps show areas in which there are opportunities for improvement (or, perhaps, show you that your orchestra is performing extremely well in its fund-raising activities).  Since the majority of annual fund-raising dollars comes from individuals, for the sake of simplicity let me focus solely on developing a list of questions you might ask these other orchestras:

•    What is your total budget?
•    How many dollars do you raise from individuals in your annual fund? (Do not count dollars raised from events, such as galas; do count private family foundations as individual gifts.)
•    How many annual fund donors do you have at each of the following levels? (These will probably change for different budget size orchestras; I've written these for smaller-budget orchestras that aren't likely to have that many gifts over $10,000; larger orchestras might cut off the bottom levels and add some higher ones.)
o    $100-$499
o    $500-$999
o    $1000-$1999
o    $2000-$2999
o    $3000-$4999
o    $5000-$7499
o    $7500-$9999
o    $10,000 and over
•    How many of your board members contribute at each of the above levels?
•    What percentage of your subscribers are also donors?

Just getting and comparing that information will provide you with an enormous amount of information to assess the fund-raising performance of your organization, and to identify areas for potential growth. It isn't a perfect method, and you must add in the knowledge that you have about your own community. But the fact that it isn't perfect does not mean it's without value. Benchmarking, if applied with intelligence, is an enormously valuable tool.

November 21, 2008 10:45 AM | | Comments (0)

Categories:

Leave a comment

Blogroll

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by on the record published on November 21, 2008 10:45 AM.

Training Administrators from Within--at Youth Orchestras and Beyond was the previous entry in this blog.

Donors and Decision-makers: The Control Issue is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads


AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.