Different the Second Time: Variation Brings Life to the Music

I was listening recently to a new operatic recital disc of bel canto arias sung by the remarkable young tenor Juan Diego Florez. Some of the scenes were rarities, but there were some old chestnuts too. The most familiar of all was the famous aria "Una furtiva lagrima" from L'elisir d'amore. As Florez finished the first verse and began the second, my wife and I, already impressed by the beauty, ease, and intelligence of his singing, were totally taken aback. He added variation to the second verse, instead of repeating it exactly as it went the first time. Some singers will vary the dynamics in a second verse, singing softly a phrase that was loud the first time around. Or they may change the phrasing. But Florez added and changed notes -- varying the tune in a way that I would imagine Donizetti actually had in mind, and that singers in his day knew how to do. The effect of Florez's variations was captivating and engrossing, and it did not lose its impact on repeated hearings. 

It got me thinking about the way repeats are rendered in our concert-hall performances. Certainly it's impossible to imagine orchestras improvising variations for repeated sections. But when a repeat is taken, in recitals or even in concertos, it would be nice to hear the soloist play around with the melodic line a bit. So many performances I have come across are given with the repeat taken precisely in the manner of the first statement -- not merely the same notes, but the exact same tempo, dynamics, and phrasing. To me this makes no sense, especially today, when we know the score far better than listeners did in the 18th century. Remember, in Beethoven's time even a conscientious listener might have only gotten to hear the Eroica Symphony a half dozen times in his life. Today, with electronic reproduction and long subscription seasons, serious listeners have heard it fifty or a hundred times, and the repeat doesn't serve its old function of impressing the principal musical ideas in our minds. 

Therefore, if a conductor is going to take repeats, he ought to consider using the second statement of the exposition to develop the performance, to propel it in some direction, and to introduce some new ideas to the articulation and phrasing of the music. Clearly this cannot be capricious, or different purely for the sake of being different, but it does seem to me it would add some dramatic shape and momentum to a performance. And it is so clear to me that adding the unexpected, bringing the element of surprise into the concert hall, has to be a positive development. I'm sure someone will accuse me of promoting a "cheap trick" or something like that, but I don't think so at all. Every piece of literature that we read telling us about the life of classical music in the 18th and 19th centuries indicates an element of theater, of the unexpected, of drama, that is all too often missing today.

And this reminds me of a set of old 78 RPM records I once had containing Bruckner's Fifth Symphony, performed by (I believe) the Saxon State Symphony under Karl Böhm. Side 11 (if I remember correctly) was the first part of the third movement, the Scherzo. Side 12 was the middle section, the Trio. Sides 13-18, perhaps, were the finale. As I'm sure you know, dear reader, the Scherzo repeats itself after the Trio in any classically structured symphony. So how did this work?  Simple. The label of side 12 said something like, "please play side 11 again before proceeding to side 13."  How's that for a truly unvaried repeat?

August 29, 2008 10:54 AM | | Comments (0)


Leave a comment


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by on the record published on August 29, 2008 10:54 AM.

Musicians: The Fourth Leg of the Stool was the previous entry in this blog.

Gidon Kremer: Defining an Ideal in Performance is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Richard Kessler on arts education
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.