GO? St. Petersburg Ballet Theatre's "Carmen"

The preview below involved one of those maddening situations where no video of the ballet existed--and I'd never seen the company. I read everything I could find on the troupe (on Nexis, for example, and the ballet boards)--but there wasn't a single review, even, of this particular ballet, which could either be marvelous or a bust. I hate being reduced to a reporter--just reporting what the director says and not being able to offer an independent eye. It even makes the questions you ask less precise. But it can't always be helped. They were coming to Long Island, so Newsday could use a preview.

What I could gather about the company was that sometimes the young dancers (median age of the principals: about 24) give in to sloppiness (probably from exhaustion, given their grueling touring schedule) and yet they have reserves of technique and feeling to call upon whenever humanly possible.

The company's claim to fame for ME, anyway, is that Leonid Jacobson once ran it--it was originally named after his specialty, "choreographic miniatures." (Its official Russian name now is the St. Petersburg State Academic Ballet Theatre--shortened for American tours.) Jacobson's work is rarely seen here, though you might know him from the ballet "Vestris," which made Baryshnikov famous and vice versa. There are also great clips on Youtube of other of his short-story ballets.

Anyway, the company has the rights to all Jacobson's works--and yet they haven't made an evening of them here! I can understand it might be hard to sell the rest of the country on the ballets--people want their long ballets--but in New York, at least, we would feel honored. The Baryshnikov Arts Center could join forces with the Joyce and sponsor a week of Jacobson--I think SF Ballet has one ballet and perhaps other U.S. and European companies do, plus this company. The Russians are very proud of this man, I keep finding out whenever I talk to artistic directors of these touring companies.

I really enjoyed talking to the current director (through a translator),Yuri Petukhov. He was modest and smart--not only knew his ballet's history, but had thought about what one thing and another meant. A real pleasure.

I would be very interested to hear from anyone who gets to see this "Carmen." I am going to try to make it, but my schedule may not allow it.

Here's that short Newsday preview:


Yuri Petukhov, artistic director of Russia's St. Petersburg Ballet Theatre, is not the first choreographer to recognize "Carmen's" potential for dance. Like many a great ballet, the popular 19th century opera sets at its heart a lowly woman who ignites lawless passion in an upstanding man. Spanish, Swedish, French and Cuban dancemakers have all made exciting use of it.

Petukhov has admired these productions: Carlos Saura's stark 1983 flamenco film; Mats Ek's buoyantly eccentric 1992 modern dance ("He can think in movement," Petukhov says); Roland Petit's erotically charged 1949 ballet; and Alberto Alonso's 1967 Expressionist distillation. Still, he felt there was room for another - one that combined the most distinctive aspects of his predecessors' styles, yet approached the characters from a new angle. Thus, the "Carmen" charging into Staller Center at Stony Brook Sunday night.
"Women usually head a ballet, but in my version Don José tells the story," Petukhov explains via a translator while on the road between Burlington, N.C., and Charlottesville, Va. Like many post-Soviet troupes, the company depends on foreign tours to stay afloat. This year they're visiting 112 U.S. cities over the course of four months.
Carmen announces at the start, "If you don't love me, I will love you, and if I love you, you'd better watch out!" She sticks to her word straight to the bitter end. Don José, on the other hand, is conflicted -- a modern hero: "José is a loyal soldier, but he deserts. He murders for Carmen, then regrets it," explains Petukhov. "He loves her, but also [his betrothed] Micaela. One is his passion, the other his soul. I felt I could draw different colors from José."
As for the dancing, Petukhov has used the defiant, earthy stance and sinuous arms of flamenco, the reach and collapse of the torso in modern dance and the incisive legs of ballet. The women's specially designed footwear reflects this hybrid, with the pointe shoe's boxy toe affixed to a low-heeled character shoe.
When Petukhov wants to emphasize Carmen's seductive powers, the ballerina digs those heels into the ground. When her expansive passion needs underlining, she rises onto her pointes. "The pointe shoe was introduced in the Romantic era so the ballerina could ascend to the gods," he explains.
Russia lacks a modern dance tradition. In line with the nation's rich ballet history, experimentation is less about throwing out the old than adding in the new. So, those bred on the iconoclasm of American modern dance might find this "Carmen" derivative, while those expecting traditional ballet might find it "unacceptable at first," warns Petukhov.
"But it is better to see than to think about," he says. "And it will grow on you."


WHEN&WHERE St. Petersburg Ballet Theatre appears in Yuri Petukhov's "Carmen" Sunday at 7 p.m. at Staller Center, Stony Brook University. Tickets $42. Call 631-632-2787 or visit stallercenter.com.

Copyright © 2008, Newsday Inc.

March 13, 2008 7:36 PM | | Comments (1)

Categories:

1 Comments

the St. Petersburg Ballet is now performing in Delaware and I'm considering seeing a performance. Would love to know what the reviews were and did you get to see them?

thank you.
Freya Koss, a ballet lover

Apollinaire responds: I didn't get to see them. The critics found "Giselle" slightly ridiculous and "Carmen" abominable. Oh, well!

Here are links to "Giselle" reviews:
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=672546&category=ARTS&newsdate=3/16/2008

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/14/AR2008031403866.html

Here is a "Carmen" review: http://www.nj.com/starledger/stories/index.ssf?/base/entertainment-1/1205732111247650.xml&coll=1

Leave a comment

Topics on Tap

Participatory Art  

and its discontents: September 21

Wednesday, January 26: the battle between steps and ideas in "downtown dance"
Thursday January 20: Tuning in to tone
Wednesday January 5 Now that your jaws are tired, I tell you about the Nuts I cracked. 
Monday December 27 The Ailey legacy, misinterpreted by the founder's own company
Saturday November 27 Neither here nor there: dances that don't bridge a gap
previous

Contributors

Eva Yaa Asantewaa 

has written dance journalism and criticism since 1976, published most notably in Dance Magazine, Soho News, The Village Voice, The New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and Gay City News, and on her own blog, InfiniteBody.

Paul Parish 

is a regular contributor to Danceviewtimes and San Francisco magazine, and has contributed to many other publications. He was a Rhodes Scholar same time as Bill Clinton. He lives and dances in Berkeley.

Me Elsewhere

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by foot in mouth published on March 13, 2008 7:36 PM.

Mark Morris's "King Arthur": I didn't like it. was the previous entry in this blog.

Macaulay Watch: The chief Times dance critic is getting better (REVISED) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

culture
About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Dewey21C
Richard Kessler on arts education
diacritical
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Flyover
Art from the American Outback
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
State of the Art
innovations and impediments in not-for-profit arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

dance
Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

jazz
Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
ListenGood
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Rifftides
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

media
Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
Overflow
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
PianoMorphosis
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
PostClassic
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Sandow
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds
The Unanswered Question
Joe Horowitz on music

publishing
book/daddy
Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

theatre
Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off

visual
Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
Artopia
John Perreault's art diary
CultureGrrl
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.