• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

Droit de suite

February 27, 2014 by Michael Rushton 2 Comments

beast of burden

Legislation is proposed to bring droit de suite - a rule in which some artists receive a share of proceeds from some resales of their art - to the United States. The New York Times reports here, and blog neighbour Lee Rosenbaum analyses the proposal here. I will just deal with one point. Patricia Cohen in the Times writes: Artists have long complained that unlike composers, filmmakers or writers, they do not receive a share of future sales. But that is a very partial view. All artists in all genres can receive one or both of two kinds of … [Read more...]

Today in film tax credits (Updated December 2, 2014)

February 21, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

created six thousand jobs

It never ends: production companies asking for, and getting, tax credits for local production when the economic case is cloudy, to say the least. The Washington Post reports: A few weeks before Season 2 of “House of Cards” debuted online, the show’s production company sent Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley a letter with this warning: Give us millions more dollars in tax credits, or we will “break down our stage, sets and offices and set up in another state.” ... Both seasons of “House of Cards” were filmed in Maryland, mostly in Baltimore and … [Read more...]

Today in tax advice: the winner takes it all

February 17, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

you can dance, you can jive

The Guardian reports on Swedish tax incentives: The glittering hotpants, sequined jumpsuits and platform heels that Abba wore at the peak of their fame were designed not just for the four band members to stand out – but also for tax efficiency, according to claims over the weekend. Reflecting on the group's sartorial record in a new book, Björn Ulvaeus said: "In my honest opinion we looked like nuts in those years. Nobody can have been as badly dressed on stage as we were." And the reason for their bold fashion choices lay not just in … [Read more...]

Is Amazon good for readers?

February 14, 2014 by Michael Rushton 2 Comments

good for this reader

I enjoyed George Packer's New Yorker article on Amazon, and recommend it. ArtsJournal's link to the story has the heading "Is Amazon good for books? Not just publishers, but books themselves?" The New Yorker's own sub-heading is "Amazon is good for customers. But is it good for books?" I find the question a bit puzzling. I can understand asking whether the rise of a particular corporation is good for buyers, publishers, authors, or other types of person. But what does it mean to ask, as a separate question, whether Amazon is "good for … [Read more...]

Pricing to fill the house

February 13, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

not fun

ArtsJournal links to this piece from Britain's Guardian on pricing at the Met (see here for an earlier post of mine on the subject). Tom Service writes: They filled just 79% of the seats in that huge, red-velvet covered house, and made only 69% of their projected box-office revenue. For all the millions who watched the cinema broadcasts, those are astonishingly low figures for the world's most expensive opera house. The Met's general manager, Peter Gelb, admits an experimentation with a more flexible pricing structure, borrowed from Broadway, … [Read more...]

Scaling the house, fifty years ago

February 10, 2014 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

love me do

Were there people who thought '$4 is an awful lot for a pops concert, I think I'll just go for a $2 seat'? Via Matt Yglesias. … [Read more...]

Rich man, poor man

February 8, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

we get letters

My last post criticizing a recent study on the distribution of the benefits of NEA funding generated a lot of commentary. I thank everyone for contributing, and will try to respond to at least some of the points raised. First, I was not staking any claim on whether public funding of the arts is a good thing. As it turns out, I do think it is a good thing - I'll post my thoughts on this later - but all I was doing in the initial post was saying that the recent study out of SMU on arts funding was flawed. That the study was trying to say … [Read more...]

NEA funding and the ecological fallacy

February 4, 2014 by Michael Rushton 28 Comments

rich town poor town doesn't matter

Are rich voters more likely to favor candidates from the Republican Party? The richest states by per capita income are Maryland, Alaska, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. Of these five, four are pretty reliably "blue" - i.e. leaning Democrat - with Alaska being the outlier. The five poorest states by per capita income are Alabama, Kentucky, Arkansas, West Virginia, and Mississippi, all of which are "red" - typically Republican. So the rich actually tend to vote Democrat, right? Wrong. That inference is an example of what statisticians … [Read more...]

Pricing at the Met

January 29, 2014 by Michael Rushton 4 Comments

not just a theory, it's the law

Today the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times report on statements from the Metropolitan Opera regarding recent changes in prices and box office revenues. The WSJ reports, under the headline "Met Opera Suffers Budget Shortfall From Pricing Backlash":       The Metropolitan Opera's $311 million budget fell short by $2.8 million last year, after a ticket price increase backfired and caused attendance to drop, according to a newly released financial-disclosure document. Last February, Met officials announced a … [Read more...]

The sunk cost fallacy

January 26, 2014 by Michael Rushton 3 Comments

rid your mind of sunk costs

It is great to be back at Artsjournal, after a fall semester of teaching a couple of courses, taking an introductory course in Mandarin, finishing up some academic papers and, most relevant to this space, completing a manuscript of a book on strategic pricing in the arts. I'll give updates as that moves along. For now, I plan on getting back to regular posting, and I welcome suggestions for any questions on pricing in the arts that might occur to you. To get started, I came across this article in the journal Psychological Science by Andrew … [Read more...]

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Carlo on What to do with the NEA? Make it Conservative?: “The Kennedy Center is offering $25 tickets in only select orchestra seating for the performances of Washington National Opera: Porgy…” May 20, 14:17
  • Carlo on Art in Turbulent Times: “The Kennedy Center today is selling discounted tickets for the Washington Opera for $20.” May 1, 21:31
  • Montague Gammon III on Art in Turbulent Times: “We would like to think that a Trumped Kennedy Center would experience a significant downturn in attendance, but we should…” Apr 22, 05:51
  • Ed Comet on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “The author has gone to the Grand Canyon with a magnifying glass, and found the rocks uninteresting.. The NEA does…” Apr 12, 16:42
  • Brtian Newhouse on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “I think that for arts patronage to work, there has to be some consensus that the activities of making and…” Apr 12, 14:28
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in