• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

Free pricing and access

April 30, 2014 by Michael Rushton 1 Comment

free for whom?Scotland has a policy of free university tuition. Today The Guardian reports:

The research by Lucy Hunter Blackburn, a former civil servant with the Scottish government, estimates that free university tuition and the cuts in grants to lower-earning students means middle-class families and students will be £20m a year better.

She estimates that the overall costs to lower-income families, including thousands of students at further education colleges, have gone up by at least £32m a year after the grant cuts forced them to take out larger loans.

“Free tuition in Scotland is the perfect middle-class, feel-good policy,” Hunter Blackburn said. “It’s superficially universal, but in fact it benefits the better-off most, and is funded by pushing the poorest students further and further into debt.

“The Scottish system for financing full-time students in higher education does not have the egalitarian, progressive effects commonly claimed for it.”

Arts administrators take note. I wrote a post on targeting of benefits in the early days of this blog, here. There are many ways to reach out to lower-income patrons, and a blanket cut in prices is not necessarily one of the better ways.

H/T @AlexUsherHESA

Share:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Trackbacks

  1. ArtsJournal – Top Posts From AJBlogs 04.30.14 says:
    April 30, 2014 at 9:34 pm

    […] We Do That AJBlog: Engaging Matters | Published 2014-04-30 Free pricing and access AJBlog: For What it’s Worth | Published 2014-04-30 St. Gauguin: Trouble in Paradise […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • antonio c. cuyler on Equality, the arts, and the problem of expensive tastes: “I applaud your courage in dissenting, Michael, even if it may place you at odds with the sector. I also…” Feb 2, 10:57
  • Michael Rushton on Equality, the arts, and the problem of expensive tastes: “Thank you David. In terms of costs, the quick, and I think too-easy answer, is cost-disease, which affects any sector,…” Feb 1, 15:04
  • David E. Myers on Equality, the arts, and the problem of expensive tastes: “Hi Michael, Always grateful for your perspectives, though as you know, I do not always agree. At the risk of…” Feb 1, 11:16
  • Michael Rushton on Equality, the arts, and the problem of expensive tastes: “Thank you, antonio. There’s a lot here – I’ll answer bit by bit… 1. I’m not sure the “equality vs…” Jan 29, 09:43
  • antonio c. cuyler on Equality, the arts, and the problem of expensive tastes: “As economists educated to believe that “some inequality” is not bad, I appreciate reading how you and Robert Reich think…” Jan 29, 09:21
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in