• Home
  • About
    • For What it’s Worth
    • Michael Rushton
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

For What It's Worth

Michael Rushton on pricing the arts

How student discounts work

May 5, 2013 by Michael Rushton Leave a Comment

show your i.d.Student discounts are offered many places – in restaurants, theaters, tuxedo rentals – and in both the commercial and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofits might want to discount student prices on equity grounds, giving them a break because they have less disposable income. But commercial firms offer these discounts too. It might be to try to gain loyalty to the brand that will extend beyond the customer’s student years. But it also could be simple price discrimination, recognizing that students have different demand patterns than graduates.

How to set the discount? I’ll keep using students as my example, but this strategy can be applied to any identifiable group: seniors, veterans, those on social assistance, those who live within a particular geographic region, etc. All that matters is that you can identify whether or not the customer belongs to the group.

To begin, imagine students and non-students as separate markets, in the same way that publishers and pharmaceutical companies treat different nations as separate markets. Then for each market, set the price that maximizes net revenues in that specific market. In other words, pick a student price that maximizes net revenues from students, and pick a non-student price that maximizes net revenues from non-students. This requires gathering intelligence on how these different segments of the population behave. How does student demand respond to a lowering of prices? How about the demand by non-students? You need to gather information on each of these types of sales over time to get a sense of the different demand patterns. Only then can you set about finding the prices for each segment that generate the most net revenue.

What are the limitations on the strategy?

First, there has to be a means whereby students cannot resell their purchases to non-students, making a profit for themselves. Perhaps student admissions are clearly marked as such, or the good cannot be bought in advance (like a ticket) but must be consumed directly on the premises (as in restaurants). Firms who price discriminate across countries in which they sell can only make it work if no one has incentive to purchase the good in the low-price country and ship it to the high-price country for resale at a profit.

Second, keep in mind that the higher the price differential between the two market segments, the higher the incentive for customers to cheat. Nobody is going to look for a fake student identification card in order to get a 10% discount at the local lunch buffet, but if it is a 50% discount and more is at stake, they might.

Third, as the price differential increases, those paying the higher price might come to feel that their own price is unfair, and be turned off buying at all. This risk is increased if the group receiving the discount is not particularly impoverished, but simply has different willingness-to-pay for the product. Discounts for seniors are not likely to be as problematic in this respect, since it is a discount most people hope to one day enjoy themselves.

Each of these limitations works in the same direction: don’t make the discount too large, even if demand patterns are quite different across the two groups, as it will increase incentives for attempts at resale, and for people falsely identifying themselves as being in the group receiving the discount, and lead to bitterness by those paying a higher price. The less these factors are likely to be an issue, the more the pure strategy of focusing on demand by the two market segments can be used.

Share:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: issues

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Rushton

Michael Rushton taught in the Arts Administration programs at Indiana University, and lives in Bloomington. An economist by training, he has published widely on such topics as public funding of the … MORE

About For What It’s Worth

What’s the price? Everything has one; admission, subscriptions, memberships, special exhibitions, box seats, refreshments, souvenirs, and on and on – a full menu. What the price is matters. Generally, nonprofit arts organizations in the US receive about half of their revenue as “earned income,” and … [Read More...]

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Carlo on What to do with the NEA? Make it Conservative?: “The Kennedy Center is offering $25 tickets in only select orchestra seating for the performances of Washington National Opera: Porgy…” May 20, 14:17
  • Carlo on Art in Turbulent Times: “The Kennedy Center today is selling discounted tickets for the Washington Opera for $20.” May 1, 21:31
  • Montague Gammon III on Art in Turbulent Times: “We would like to think that a Trumped Kennedy Center would experience a significant downturn in attendance, but we should…” Apr 22, 05:51
  • Ed Comet on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “The author has gone to the Grand Canyon with a magnifying glass, and found the rocks uninteresting.. The NEA does…” Apr 12, 16:42
  • Brtian Newhouse on What do to with the NEA? Pull the plug?: “I think that for arts patronage to work, there has to be some consensus that the activities of making and…” Apr 12, 14:28
Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in