• Home
  • About
    • Speaker
    • Sarah Lutman
    • Contact
  • AJBlogs
  • ArtsJournal

Speaker

Sarah Lutman amplified

Just say no

December 11, 2010 by Sarah Lutman 4 Comments

When you go to the Grantmakers in the Arts website you can read two documents there that provide deep background on a conversation GIA members are having about trends in their work and how their grants shape the financial and artistic vitality of the nonprofit cultural sector.  The reports posted there are the result of a literature review and then meetings to discuss capitalization in the nonprofit arts sector (and lack thereof).

The funders’ group asserts that a) arts and cultural organizations are undercapitalized which “leads us to be concerned about their sustainability and the financial health of the sector as a whole, and that persistent uncapitalization has the strong potential to erode artistic vision and quality” and b) that “there is an oversupply of product in some marketplaces, and that current funding practices do not address this issue”  (emphasis mine).

I have been thinking about this premise ever since I read the report earlier in the fall,  trying to understand what funders really mean when they say there is an oversupply of product.  Surely there is no such thing as too much art? I think what funders mean is that there are too many applicants, so they need to re-think their funding criteria.   They’re telling us that there are a lot of organizations, some are losing audience, are financially weak, or are no longer artistically vibrant, and they can’t fund all of us or even as many of us as they used to fund.

I think it is good for funders to make bigger bets on their grantees and I hope this is an outcome of the report.  Grant size is static.  For example, the median size of an arts grant is $25,000 according to the Foundation Center, and has not changed since 1993.  Meanwhile the cost of living has gone up about 50 percent from 1993 – 2010, meaning that an organization spends around $37,000 now to get the results that $25,000 bought in 1993 (I used the American Institute for Economic Research calculator for this.)  Many foundations had a funding cap of $1 million back going as far back as the 1980’s, and in many cases their maximum has not changed.

Beyond this, if an organization is artistically stagnant, losing significant audience, financially undisciplined or unsound, or irrelevant in its community, funders could do something else — they could just say no.  That in and of itself would be a service to the field.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Janet Brown says

    December 13, 2010 at 11:12 AM

    Thank you Sarah.

    Reply
  2. Amy Mueller says

    January 21, 2011 at 9:19 PM

    Dear Sarah,

    I wholeheartedly agree with you, retiring an organization after its life starts to dim, its initial energy and spark is no longer current or cogent, when the institution finds itself making artistic decisions based primarily on a perceived interest of its audience (as opposed to leading its audience, with the audience’s trust in them), then its time to retire! leave room for new sprouts to blossom. its very problematic that there is so little room at the bottom of the pyramid, and that BASE , that FOUNDATION is stymied by stagnancy at the top, or shall we say, a plateau.

    thank you!
    amy

    Reply
  3. Max says

    January 31, 2011 at 8:56 AM

    Unless and until we all recognize that the demand is decreasing, we will be incapable of addressing the profound shifts in the arts economy. Audiences are shrinking at a rate of 3-5% per year, on average, and with the deep cuts in arts education, this can’t help but continue to be true. How can we address our obstacles if we don’t see them? In the early 90’s, one of the leaders of a major foundation addressed the TCG conference by saying “you are competing with ambulances.” It’s more true now, post 9/11, than it was then. What we’re doing now is asking for foundations and the NEA to invest in an oversupply of typewriters.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. overstocked arts pond: fish too big & fish too many | Jumper says:
    January 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM

    […] at a rate of one every three hours? It’s reasonable to suggest, as Sarah Lutman has in her blog on this report, that foundations should ‘just say no’. Unfortunately, foundations throw so few pellets in the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sarah Lutman

I am a Twin Cities-based independent consultant and writer working with cultural, philanthropic and public media organizations across the United States. You can read my entire bio on LinkedIn or read about current clients and projects on the Lutman & Associates web site.

Speaker

Speaker is about amplifying things I am seeing, hearing, doing, and thinking that have relevance to the daily practice of leading a cultural institution. You can expect me to draw from topics ranging … [Read More...]

Archives

@lutman_sarah

Tweets by @lutman_sarah

Recent Comments

  • Cathy Day on Farewell Bush Artist Fellowships Program: “I was a Bush Artist Fellow in 1999-2000. I was able to take an unpaid leave from my teaching position…” Apr 19, 17:30
  • Steven Clift on Announcing Hothouse: Exploring new ideas in co-working with the Minneapolis Institute of Arts: “The E-Democracy/Open Twin Cities crew is looking forward to mixing it up. We will be looking for unconference partners as…” Jul 23, 19:13
  • David Haas on Be the orchestra: thinking far beyond putting concerts online: “superlative! thanks (biased of course, but all the same..)” Jul 19, 07:23
  • Susan Chandler on Be the orchestra: thinking far beyond putting concerts online: “What a fantastic project! Thank you so much for sharing all the info about it.” Jul 15, 08:50
  • KCB on Practicing extreme transparency: Why does your “About Us” section have to be so boring?: “Why don’t more US cultural institutions pursue “radical transparency”? I’m not a “leader,” but I have an answer: “openness and…” Jul 9, 05:20

What’s up this week

Check out my most recent piece in
Twin Cities Business Monthly

Return to top of page

an ArtsJournal blog

This blog published under a Creative Commons license

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in