Archives for 2003

…coming to you live from the dial-up connection of an iBook perched precariously on a 60-year-old card table located in the guest bedroom of my mother’s house deep in southeast Missouri, far beyond the reach of any high-culture events not being carried on commercial TV.

Translation: I’m home for Christmas, after a thrilling early-morning battle with a very orange LaGuardia Airport, where lines are long and tempers were already pretty damn short as of six this morning. I shudder to think what it’s like by now, which is one reason why it’s nice to be in a small town this afternoon. Here’s another: it’s quiet, and there’s no one on the streets. The trees are bare, the sky slate-gray. The nearest mall is 30 miles away. I really do love New York, but it’s good to get away (especially after just having seen three plays in three days), and I’m definitely away, and glad to be (except that I’m having a hell of a time getting used to dial-up again).

I should add, however, that I got two hours of sleep last night, and I have a piece to write tonight, so I may not start nibbling at the mail until tomorrow. Nevertheless, my antenna is up, and insofar as this slooooow modem allows me to surf the Web, I’m reconnected to the blogosphere. Like the song says, you’re gonna hear from me…later.

In the meantime, hello to Maud, Mr. TMFTML, Old Hag, Cup of Chicha, 2 Blowhards, Sarah Weinman, Cinetrix at Pullquote, Bookslut, Modern Art Notes, Felix Salmon, and all the other cool big-city bloggers whose thoughts you can access by ooching over to the right-hand column and sifting through the blogroll. They’ll take up the slack while I readjust to small-town life. And a big old wet kiss to Our Girl in Chicago, who is safely installed among her family in an undisclosed secure location, from which she has promised to post something or other, sooner or later.

Now for a nap.

“A certain amount of brick-throwing might even be a good thing. There comes a moment in the career of most artists, if they are any good, when attacks on their work take a form almost more acceptable than praise.”

Anthony Powell, Casanova’s Chinese Restaurant

Judging by the Site Meter, most of you have more important things to do this weekend than read blogs. For those diehards who can’t get enough, this is to inform you that I’m out of here very early tomorrow morning, and pretty much every minute between now and then is spoken for. I went to plays on Friday and Saturday, and I’ve got another one to see today. I’m writing my best-of-2003 “Second City” column for the Washington Post and an unrelated magazine piece. Oh, yes, I mustn’t forget to pack.

All of which is to say that I don’t think you’ll be hearing from me again until I’m safely ensconced in Missouri some time Monday evening. Once I’m there, I’ll send up a flare, and I plan to spend the week posting and responding to those items from the “About Last Night” mailbox that I’ve set aside for precisely that purpose. I don’t know what OGIC is planning, but I’m sure it’ll be as good, if not better.

See you later.

“One of the things I learned very early is that students always recognize a good teacher. They may be overimpressed by second-raters who only talk a good game, who are witty and entertaining, or who have reputations as scholars, without being particularly good teachers. But I have not come across a single first-rate teacher who was not recognized as such by the students. The first-rate teacher is often not ‘popular’; in fact, popularity has little to do with impact as a teacher. But when students say about a teacher, ‘We are learning a great deal,’ they can be trusted. They know.”

Peter F. Drucker, Adventures of a Bystander

I wonder how many classical music lovers under the age of 40 know who Walter Legge was. Not many, I suspect. Older record collectors, of course, know exactly who Legge was: from the end of World War II to 1964, he was one of the half-dozen most powerful people in the classical music business. He founded and ran London’s Philharmonia Orchestra, which in the days of Herbert von Karajan and Otto Klemperer was the best orchestra in Great Britain; he was the husband of Elisabeth Schwarzkopf, whose career as an opera singer and recitalist he supervised painstakingly and obsessively. Most important of all, he was EMI’s chief classical producer, the man to whom we owe, among countless other irreplaceable treasures, such complete opera sets as the Callas-Gobbi-de Sabata Tosca,
the Schwarzkopf-Karajan Rosenkavalier,
and the Flagstad-Furtw

Michael Kinsley, who has his moments (but oh, those quarter-hours!), recently put his finger on something that’s always irritated me. We all know that politicians never tell the truth, but I don’t mind flat-out lies–that goes with the territory. What drives me wild is their inability to say anything without spinning it. Whatever else you may think of him, Howard Dean occasionally does otherwise, as Kinsley points out:

After calling Saddam’s capture “a great day” for the military, for Iraqis, and for Americans generally, he added that it was “frankly, a great day for the administration.” This is a rare example of a politician saying “frankly” and then saying something actually frank. It comes close to admitting the obvious: that this development helps Bush’s chance of winning next year’s election and therefore hurts Dean’s.

It’s a real mystery why politicians find it so hard to admit the obvious about the horse-race aspects of politics. No doubt it requires a dose of blind optimism to be a politician in the first place. Even Dennis Kucinich must think he has a 1-in-10,000 chance of becoming president, when his chance is actually much smaller. But there is also an annoying convention that you must pretend to a confidence you don’t feel. Anyone who doesn’t realize that this week’s news has been a big boost for Bush’s re-election is too stupid or blinded to be elected president. Yet the press will punish any candidate who says so, possibly because if the candidates take up stating the obvious, they’re stealing our material. The pols need to be coy and evasive so that we can tell it to you straight.

Once again, this is not–repeat, not–a political blog. My reason for drawing your attention to Kinsley’s column has to do with the impeccably cultural topic of what used to be called “manners,” by which I don’t mean choosing the right fork. It is an aspect of American manners that our politicians emulate our advertisers by engaging in the 24-hour robotic spin that determines their every public utterance: “So, Senator, how do you explain the presence of that cheap hooker in your hotel room?” “When I am elected president, the failed economic policies of the current administration will be reversed, thus reducing the burden on the middle class!” (No doubt this phenomenon is in large part a function of the takeover of the political process by lawyers.) In the process, they debase the culture as well, precisely because they’re not fooling anybody. When the men and women who lead us, or wish to lead us, engage in such shameless and transparent verbal trickery, they are going far beyond the necessary quotient of euphemism that lubricates everyday human transactions. They are proving themselves consistently untrustworthy in small things. Why, then, should we trust them in large ones?

I doubt I’m the only person in America who’s noticed this phenomenon, and who finds it more than merely disagreeable. I’ve posted this description of contemporary politicians before, but it’s worth repeating:

A walking, talking person-shaped but otherwise not very human amalgam of “positions,” that familiar, tirelessly striving figure interviewed on the evening news who resoundingly tells you what he is thinking–and you keep wondering whether you should believe a word of it. These are people who don’t seem to live in the world so much as to inhabit some point on graph paper, whose coordinates are (sideways) the political spectrum and (up and down) the latest overnight poll figures.

It’s from Meg Greenfield’s Washington, a book written in secret by the woman who ran the editorial page of the Washington Post for years–and who made sure her truth-telling wouldn’t see print until after her death. It’s brilliantly put, but what does it say about Washington (or about Greenfield, for that matter) that she considered it too hot to publish while she was still alive?

Back in World War II, shortly before the greasy cloud of spin had settled on the land, Gen. Joseph Stilwell, whose nickname was “Vinegar Joe,” met the press after having been forced to retreat from Burma by the Japanese. He said, “I claim we got a hell of a beating. We got run out of Burma and it is as humiliating as hell. I think we ought to find out what caused it, go back and re-take it.”

The day any politician of either party makes so blunt a remark within earshot of microphones–and declines to retract, moderate, or invert it before the day is out–you’ll know the barometer of cultural health in America is moving in the right direction. But don’t hang by your thumbs waiting for it.

If you own an iPod, or are an Apple fanatic, you’d better read this. Now.

Got that, OGIC?

Sorry, Terry! But that’s not how I say it (see the post directly below). I’m not sure why, but I’ve always been oh-gic (with a hard “G”) to me. I’m just not fond of that chewy “odge” sound, and I definitely prefer the long “O,” like the letter. I think this makes my pronunication sound more like the acronym it is, which I like. I’ve never been known by an acronym before, and I’m finding it rather enchanting. Makes me feel kind of official. So I’m afraid I’m going to have to go over your head here and declare mine the official pronunciation.

Funny, isn’t it, that we never discovered we were saying this differently?

And yes, I did make a Liza Minnelli reference up there. Weird, huh?