main: August 2008 Archives

I have not seen the original 3:10 to Yuma (1957), made during the high noon of 1950s Westerns, when the hats were either white or black, and the heads wearing them either good or evil.  So I don't know how much moral ambiguity it goes in for.

But I have seen the remake, released in 2007, and unlike most of the films released 50 years after the classic Western era, it actually does an intelligent job of portraying gray hats and conflicted minds.  The story is a little contrived, but it works: Dan Evans (Christian Bale) is an impoverished rancher who agrees to deliver a dangerous outlaw named Ben Wade (Russell Crowe) to the train that will carry him to justice.

The chances of getting killed by Wade's nasty gang are sky high, but Evans takes the job in order to save his ranch and, more important, redeem himself in the eyes of his older son, who has started to see his father as a wuss.

Wade is the kind of brilliant bad guy you see in movies, adept at finding everyone's weak spot and taking full advantage of it.  Grasping in a hot minute what is going on between Evans and his son, Wade charms the boy, tempting him to admire this killer more than his own dad.

All of this spell-casting is aimed at facilitating Wade's escape and would do so, if Evans were an ordinary rancher.  But he is not.  He is not quite as cunning as Wade, but his mind is clearer and his spirit stronger.

The turning point comes when Wade gets the better of Evans and is about to kill him.  Evans doesn't beg; rather he confesses to Wade that he committed an act of cowardice during the Civil War.  Wade spares him, and they start to work together almost as a team, to convince everyone that Wade is in fact being placed on the 3:10 to Yuma.  (Whether he will end up in Yuma, I have my doubts.)  But Evans, at the price of his life, wins back his son's esteem.

The question is why did that confession make such a difference?  The only explanation I can come up with is that by revealing his own ignoble side, Evans  levels the playing field, so that Wade can locate and act on his own suppressed nobility.
August 24, 2008 6:35 PM | | Comments (0)
A wise social scientist once commented to me that the most important task facing any society is the socialization of its young men.  Philosophers have concentrated on this question for thousands of years, and like it or not, almost every cultural tradition defines education as the molding of the male according to certain ideals.

Obviously we women don't care for this arrangement.  But setting that aside for a moment, consider that the problem facing American society these days is not that it neglects the education of young women but that it screws up the socialization of young men.  The most powerful shaper of popular attitudes is the entertainment industry, and what is it doing?  This short article in today's New York Times sums it up very effectively -- all the more so because it is so bizarrely uncritical.

This mentality can be summed up simply: Young men have no minds, souls, or characters worth bothering about; they care about nothing, respect nothing, and aspire to nothing.  They are pure appetite and aggression, just waiting to be pandered to for money.  So may the best panderer win.

Already I am tired of the fuss over Michael Phelps, who has won eight gold medals but seems to have less charisma than a carp.  But at least he aspired to greatness and achieved it.  Without sports -- and, of course, war -- what other challenges are presented to young men?  Being the biggest gross-out on the block?
August 17, 2008 10:10 AM |


Me Elsewhere


About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the main category from August 2008.

main: June 2008 is the previous archive.

main: September 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

AJ Ads

AJ Blogs

AJBlogCentral | rss

About Last Night
Terry Teachout on the arts in New York City
Artful Manager
Andrew Taylor on the business of arts & culture
blog riley
rock culture approximately
critical difference
Laura Collins-Hughes on arts, culture and coverage
Richard Kessler on arts education
Douglas McLennan's blog
Dog Days
Dalouge Smith advocates for the Arts
Art from the American Outback
Life's a Pitch
For immediate release: the arts are marketable
Mind the Gap
No genre is the new genre
Performance Monkey
David Jays on theatre and dance
Plain English
Paul Levy measures the Angles
Real Clear Arts
Judith H. Dobrzynski on Culture
Rockwell Matters
John Rockwell on the arts
Straight Up |
Jan Herman - arts, media & culture with 'tude

Foot in Mouth
Apollinaire Scherr talks about dance
Seeing Things
Tobi Tobias on dance et al...

Jazz Beyond Jazz
Howard Mandel's freelance Urban Improvisation
Focus on New Orleans. Jazz and Other Sounds
Doug Ramsey on Jazz and other matters...

Out There
Jeff Weinstein's Cultural Mixology
Serious Popcorn
Martha Bayles on Film...

classical music
Creative Destruction
Fresh ideas on building arts communities
The Future of Classical Music?
Greg Sandow performs a book-in-progress
On the Record
Exploring Orchestras w/ Henry Fogel
Harvey Sachs on music, and various digressions
Bruce Brubaker on all things Piano
Kyle Gann on music after the fact
Greg Sandow on the future of Classical Music
Slipped Disc
Norman Lebrecht on Shifting Sound Worlds

Jerome Weeks on Books
Quick Study
Scott McLemee on books, ideas & trash-culture ephemera

Drama Queen
Wendy Rosenfield: covering drama, onstage and off
lies like truth
Chloe Veltman on how culture will save the world

Aesthetic Grounds
Public Art, Public Space
Another Bouncing Ball
Regina Hackett takes her Art To Go
John Perreault's art diary
Lee Rosenbaum's Cultural Commentary
Modern Art Notes
Tyler Green's modern & contemporary art blog
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.