In considering the ways today’s art is an art of appropriation, let’s notice a basic change that’s occurred in writing, composing, and design. Editing used to involve re-writing, re-typing, re-drawing — physically copying some previously used material into each new version. Computer-enabled editing techniques now mean that the virtual copying and pasting of material from one version of a project to another is routine whether we’re working with words, written music, sound, or photographic images.
This is an important practice in a world where intellectual property is functionally and conceptually challenged, a world in which much interesting “new” art is a making of pathways through the accumulated culture of the past – “postproduction art,” as Nicolas Borriaud terms it.
It’s difficult to preserve, in theory or practice, a clear distinction between appropriating pre-made material coming from inside and outside a project. And long standing questions about the granularity of ideas are everyday challenges. Can an intertext of one note be a “theft”? One chord? Which four notes are a lexia?
Clover-v!



Recent Comments
Bill Boggs on Transaction
Bruce, I often think that music gets better as it gets older myself. I grew up in the 60s...Bill Boggs on Continuity Conscious
I have had great students do a variety of things. One of my best students, who is 17 years...Arthur on Photographs of Paderewski
Normally, pianists don't receive the recognition they deserve. Instead, many talentless individuals are called "celebrities". However, Paderewski is an exception....Angelo Bambini on Fixed
Technology has taken art and education to brand new levels that I never would have dreamed 20 years ago. ...William Boggs on Cause or Effect?
The thing that I notice about certain sheet music is that 5 different pianists can make the same notes sound...