{"id":924,"date":"2013-06-30T11:54:10","date_gmt":"2013-06-30T18:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/?p=924"},"modified":"2013-06-30T11:54:10","modified_gmt":"2013-06-30T18:54:10","slug":"the-great-small-plate-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/06\/the-great-small-plate-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"The great small plate debate"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"is<\/a>My very first post<\/a> for this blog was about why for some products – cable TV, museums, Disneyland – you are made to purchase a “bundle” of items (one hundred channels, permission to visit many rooms in the museum, all the rides you can do in a day) rather than being able to buy a la carte (one or two channels, just a ticket to see the abstract expressionists, one ride on Magic Mountain). In the latter two cases it might be just too hard administratively to make it work, but that’s not true of cable, where it is easy and costless for the provider to allow or disallow access to individual channels. Our answer was that it is more profitable for the seller (even absent any administrative costs of checking tickets for each room at the museum or ride at Disneyland) to provide a large package of attractions to all, and charge an “entry fee” that reflects the value customers will place on the bundle as a whole, even if they don’t take advantage of every channel, or room at the museum, or ride at Disneyland.<\/p>\n

The topic re-appeared this week when Neil Irwin<\/a> wrote a piece in the Washington Post<\/em> bemoaning the trend in DC for restaurants serving “small plates”. Indeed, not just in DC: even my local watering hole<\/a> in not-all-that-trendy Bloomington has gone for the small. Irwin writes:<\/p>\n

Chefs of America: Embrace the entr\u00e9e. Embrace the challenge of creating a dish that is balanced and enjoyable, arrives at the same time for the entire table and meets the nutritional needs of your customer. The dining experience is not about you and your convenience. It is about creating an enjoyable place where people will come and spend their hard-earned money. The small-plates phenomenon is a fraud, wrought upon all of us.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Matt Yglesias<\/a> responds that with small plates customers can, at lower cost, experiment with unfamiliar dishes. And Tyler Cowen<\/a> thinks it must be about price discrimination:<\/p>\n

Big plates are like a \u201ctake it or leave it\u201d cable contract, and small plates are like the a\u2019la carte cable pricing schemes.\u00a0 The bundled contract gets some marginal channels to people who wouldn\u2019t otherwise be willing to pay for them if those channels were sold on a stand-alone basis.\u00a0\u00a0 In the TV context some of us browse reality TV, Farsi news, and women\u2019s roller derby, even if we wouldn\u2019t pay for those transmissions per se.\u00a0 In the restaurant context, the big plate gets some of us to eat more vegetables and munch on more parsley.\u00a0 Who would pay much for coleslaw?\u00a0 Output goes up under many of the most basic scenarios and consumer welfare goes up too. …<\/p>\n

Those who have a relatively low marginal value for the add-on items of a meal (vegetables?) will be the ones who eat less under a regime of small plates.\u00a0 How their consumer surplus fares, a priori, is more complex and is not easily settled by theory alone.\u00a0 But, using some typical numbers, very often those who value the vegetables inelastically are worse off under a regime of small plates.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Thoughts:<\/p>\n

First, one thing that makes a restaurant different from cable TV is that every item on the plate comes with some marginal cost. The\u00a0Thai-marinated flank steak with Chinese cabbage, fennel and Sriracha BBQ I can get at The Rail does not come with the starch or filler I might get with a “big plate” at another eatery, but those items, though cheap, would still come with some cost to provide (time and space in the kitchen, not just the raw ingredients).<\/p>\n

Second, the examples I gave at the top of this post for “bundles” operate on the idea that different customers will rank the items in the bundle differently, and selling as a package is a way to exploit that. But, as Cowen asks, “who would pay much for cole slaw”? Maybe the idea here is that small plates are good for people who want a small meal, without the filler, and should be compared not to cable TV but to the ability to download digital singles rather than purchasing complete albums?<\/p>\n

Third, what is interesting is the fact that small-plate restaurants exist<\/em>. The technology is available to have cable providers enter the market who would sell access to channels on an a la carte basis, but we don’t<\/em> see them, suggesting that big bundles of channels really are the only sustainable business model. Customers go to places with small plates not just because they are trendy – after all, tapas bars have been around a long time – but because being able to order food in that format is enjoyable and worth paying for.<\/p>\n

Irwin makes a fundamental mistake when he says small plate restaurants are all about the advantages to the seller. All those hundreds of thousands of DC interns have the option of going to places with big plates – there must be something<\/em> in the small plate menu that works for them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My very first post for this blog was about why for some products – cable TV, museums, Disneyland – you are made to purchase a “bundle” of items (one hundred channels, permission to visit many rooms in the museum, all the rides you can do in a day) rather than being able to buy a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-924","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-issues","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3dIW5-eU","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/02\/museums-amusement-parks-and-cable-tv\/","url_meta":{"origin":924,"position":0},"title":"Museums, Amusement Parks and Cable TV","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"February 24, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Should museums charge visitors according to the length of their visit? \u00a0In a recent paper Bruno Frey and Lasse Steiner argue they should. We pay per hour when we park our cars, so why not when we go to view art? This question came to mind during the recent flare\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"bundling\"","block_context":{"text":"bundling","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/tag\/bundling\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"\"Zero marginal cost, you say?\"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/Family_watching_television_1958-300x279.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1284,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/05\/we-switched-round-and-round-til-half-past-dawn\/","url_meta":{"origin":924,"position":1},"title":"We switched ’round and ’round ’til half-past dawn","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"May 6, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"A new report from the Nielson company: According to Nielsen\u2019s forthcoming Advertising & Audiences Report, the average U.S. TV home now receives 189 TV channels\u2014a record high and significant jump since 2008, when the average home received 129 channels. Despite this increase, however, consumers have consistently tuned in to an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"\"Zero marginal cost, you say?\"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/Family_watching_television_1958.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/Family_watching_television_1958.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/Family_watching_television_1958.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":636,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/04\/arts-policy-research-is-expensive\/","url_meta":{"origin":924,"position":2},"title":"Arts policy research is expensive","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"April 9, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"In an earlier post I talked about how firms with a large set of distinct items to sell - a cable television provider with many channels; a museum with many rooms - would find it most efficient to offer only a package deal to customers, with no a la carte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"expensive reading","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/journals-219x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1982,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2016\/02\/is-there-a-canadian-cultural-policy-crisis\/","url_meta":{"origin":924,"position":3},"title":"Is there a Canadian cultural policy crisis?","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"February 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"At the Globe and Mail, Kate Taylor writes: The policy tools that have protected and nurtured Canada\u2019s cultural industries since the 1970s are unknown to transnational distributors of foreign content \u2013 that would be Google, YouTube and Netflix \u2013 while Canadian consumers are increasingly sidestepping the domestic distributors who, whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"a childhood favourite","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/paddle-to-the-sea.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4615,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2025\/11\/ai-and-artists-and-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":924,"position":4},"title":"AI and artists and rights","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"November 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a recent piece at Lawfare, by Simon Goldstein and Peter N. Salib, \u201cCopyright should not protect artists from artificial intelligence.\u201d The article has the strawman subtitle, \u201cThe purpose of intellectual property law is to incentivize the production of new ideas, not to function as a welfare scheme for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-2.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-2.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/image-2.png?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1541,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/09\/what-have-the-romans-ever-done-for-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":924,"position":5},"title":"What have the Romans ever done for us?","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"September 28, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Think of your cultural consumption in your late teens. It was pretty great, wasn't it? Favorite bands, and getting their new LP within days of release, favorite magazines about music and films and books, lining up to get tickets for the movie everyone in the papers was talking about. I\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stones were so much better then","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=924"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}