{"id":399,"date":"2013-03-03T11:34:55","date_gmt":"2013-03-03T19:34:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/?p=399"},"modified":"2013-03-03T11:34:55","modified_gmt":"2013-03-03T19:34:55","slug":"consumer-optimism-at-the-gym-and-the-museum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/03\/consumer-optimism-at-the-gym-and-the-museum\/","title":{"rendered":"Consumer optimism at the gym and the museum"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Cardio_Gym_1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-401\" alt=\"Where are all the people who bought memberships?\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Cardio_Gym_1-300x137.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"137\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Cardio_Gym_1-300x137.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Cardio_Gym_1-1024x468.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/Cardio_Gym_1.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>While at the gym this morning I got to thinking about &#8230; what I pay to go to the gym. I have a membership, although the option of day passes is available to me. The rational thing for me to do at the start is to figure out how often I intend to go, and calculate which is the better deal, membership or day passes. I know that I am more likely to go more often with a membership because the monetary marginal cost to me (although not the cost in time) will be zero dollars per visit, and I should take that into account.<\/p>\n<p>But are people rational when they make these decisions? Of course, we all think of <em>ourselves<\/em> as rational, but what is the evidence? In a <a href=\"http:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/a\/aea\/aecrev\/v96y2006i3p694-719.html\">paper<\/a> published in the <em>American Economic Review<\/em>, Stefano DellaVigna and Ulrike Malmendier found that the average gym member was paying much more per visit than the cost of a day pass. Note: it&#8217;s not just a few people making a poor financial decision, but the <em>average<\/em> member is losing money. The reason is optimism over gym attendance &#8211; people <em>think<\/em> they will attend more than than they actually do, because of course they <em>hope<\/em> they will attend more than they have in the past. Firms exploit our optimism in many different facets of pricing. In another <em>American Economic Review<\/em> <a href=\"www.mit.edu\/~mgrubb\/aer.99.5.pdf\">article<\/a>, Michael Grubb considers the very high interest rates charged by credit cards, high late fees charged on rentals, and steep marginal prices on cellular and texting plans: even when the terms are spelled out to us very clearly in advance, we are convinced we will not use our credit cards as a source of loans, we will return rented movies on time, we will monitor our calls and texting. Except that we don&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>How does all this inform pricing? When facing the rational, self-knowing consumer,\u00a0 the membership price reflects the fact that there are diminishing marginal returns to visits &#8211; I place less value on each subsequent visit than the one before. Members don&#8217;t go to the facility every chance they get, even though they get in free, because the joy soon starts to diminish and our time is short &#8211; there are only so many visits we want in a year even when the entry fee is zero. The faster we expect diminishing returns to take effect, the better the &#8220;deal&#8221; that membership needs to offer. It is no use telling a customer &#8220;you should buy a membership if you plan on attending more than twelve times this year&#8221; if it is a very rare person who would <em>want<\/em> to attend twelve times in a year. But if the customer mistakenly thinks she <em>will<\/em> want to attend at least twelve times in the year, then it is strategic for the organization to advertise this option, and know that the price that can be charged is higher than in a world of perfectly rational buyers.<\/p>\n<p>If museums are like gyms (note <a href=\"http:\/\/museumtwo.blogspot.com\/2007\/11\/rethinking-membership-what-does-it-mean.html\">Nina Simon<\/a> made the gym-museum analogy a few years ago) &#8211; something people think is a worthy activity that they <em>ought<\/em> to do more of, and <em>will<\/em> do more of if they have a membership &#8211; then diminishing returns occur faster than people expect they will. Their visits to the museum with a membership will be fewer than they forecast when they bought it, and museums <em>could<\/em> exploit this by soliciting memberships at a (higher) price they know is in fact not a sound monetary decision by the visitor (putting aside for now that the membership might be valued for other reasons than just the visits themselves).<\/p>\n<p>I have no data comparable to what we have on gym use. How many museum members end up in a year paying more per visit than the cost of a single admission? Is it, like gyms seem to be, the normal outcome? I&#8217;d really like to see some numbers on this.<\/p>\n<p>Footnote (as shared by DellaVigna and Malmendier):\u00a0 \u201cMonday 28 April. [&#8230;] Gym visits 0, no. of gym visits so far this year 1, cost of gym membership per year \u00a3370; cost of single gym visit \u00a3123 (v. bad economy).\u201d Helen Fielding, <em>Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While at the gym this morning I got to thinking about &#8230; what I pay to go to the gym. I have a membership, although the option of day passes is available to me. The rational thing for me to do at the start is to figure out how often I intend to go, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-399","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3dIW5-6r","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1274,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/05\/gary-becker-the-economic-way-of-thinking-and-the-arts\/","url_meta":{"origin":399,"position":0},"title":"Gary Becker, the economic way of thinking, and the arts (updated)","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"May 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"University of Chicago economist, and Nobel Laureate, Gary Becker, has died at the age of 83. A brief summary of his work is here, and a more complete picture given by his Nobel address, here. He is one of the most influential economists of the contemporary era. His innovations stemmed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;issues&quot;","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rational change in what we want","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Gary-Becker.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2771,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2022\/05\/book-diary-may-19-desires-about-desires-nudges-merit-goods-again-duties-and-commitments\/","url_meta":{"origin":399,"position":1},"title":"Book Diary &#8211; May 19 &#8211; Desires about desires, nudges, merit goods again, duties and commitments","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"May 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"My previous post was here. A lot of writing today, so this entry a bit longer and in the weeds than usual... In economic analysis, of arts funding or anything else, people's preferences are assumed to be \u201crational\u201d, which here has the narrow definition of consistency (If I prefer the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;issues&quot;","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"watch that bookcase...","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Howards-End.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Howards-End.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Howards-End.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Howards-End.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2926,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2023\/08\/museums-are-not-expensive-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":399,"position":2},"title":"Museums are not expensive","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"New Yorkers who are interested in seeing the film Barbie at the local multiplex will pay $25.49 per ticket. If, on the same weekend, they wish to also see Oppenheimer, as I read, in about one hundred and forty-seven news reports, people were doing, then we are up to $51.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;issues&quot;","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/image.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2379,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2018\/11\/identification-please\/","url_meta":{"origin":399,"position":3},"title":"Identification, please","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"November 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"What are the keys to success in the art world? Some combination of hard work, smart early career choices, artistic talent, access to the connected and the gate-keepers, and a bit of serendipity. The same could be said of many professions. But it's very hard to discern the relative importance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;issues&quot;","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Show me your structural model","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/passport.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/passport.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/passport.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/passport.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/passport.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/passport.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":910,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/06\/cost-disease-wages-and-skills\/","url_meta":{"origin":399,"position":4},"title":"Cost disease, wages and skills","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"June 27, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Cost disease is often cited as an economic phenomenon that poses particular challenges in the arts, especially the live performing arts. In a nutshell, here is the theory: productivity is defined as the value of output produced per worker. Rising income over time depends upon rising productivity: if the economy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;issues&quot;","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"the human touch","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/Floyd-300x209.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1756,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/12\/should-nonprofit-museums-have-free-admission-because-they-are-tax-exempt\/","url_meta":{"origin":399,"position":5},"title":"Should nonprofit museums have free admission because they are tax exempt?","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"December 20, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"No. But Christopher Knight\u00a0at the LA Times thinks they should: Yes, every art museum needs multiple sources of revenue. It does cost money to run the place. However, because they are tax exempt, art museums already count the public as a major, indirect source of revenue. Required admission fees add\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;issues&quot;","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"And everybody should have one","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pony.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pony.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pony.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pony.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/pony.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=399"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}