{"id":2856,"date":"2023-03-22T05:06:28","date_gmt":"2023-03-22T12:06:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/?p=2856"},"modified":"2023-03-22T05:06:30","modified_gmt":"2023-03-22T12:06:30","slug":"art-and-morality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2023\/03\/art-and-morality\/","title":{"rendered":"Art and Morality"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

“There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written, or badly written. That is all.” So says Oscar Wilde. Is he right?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new issue of the British Journal of Aesthetics <\/em>has arrived in my mailbox, and the October 2022 issue<\/a> is devoted to the question(s) of art and morality, including discussion of four recent books: Mary Beth Willard’s Why It’s OK to Enjoy the Work of Immoral Artists<\/a>; Ted Nannicelli’s Artistic Creation and Ethical Criticism<\/a>; Erich Hatala Matthes’s Drawing the Line: What to do with the Work of Immoral Artists<\/a>; and James Harold’s Dangerous Art<\/a>. I’m looking forward to reading the symposium when the semester is done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I find these are challenging topics to teach. Our arts management students need to have thought about these issues, since, as any regular reader of artsjournal.com<\/a> knows, arts-presenting organizations are often called upon to make decisions about what to do about problematic works or art, or artists who themselves are, as they say, a piece of work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I divide the question into three parts. I start with the more abstract question of whether one can or should separate the aesthetic qualities of a work of art from any underlying ethical issues in its narrative. Can the artist’s treatment of race, gender, violence and cruelty, be so cavalier or wrongheaded that it cannot help but affect any distanced appreciation of the artist’s craft? Here I find Noel Carroll’s essay on “Moderate Moralism<\/a>” the best introduction for students to the question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I then move on to the question of what the arts manager is to do<\/em> with great, but problematic, works. Note the word “great”: if the art is simply not very interesting, then there isn’t really a question – no need to have it in the program. But if there is a work that has long been hailed as great, and contains within it real beauty, what then? Proceed as usual, or cut it from programming, or present it as a special case, with attempts to communicate to the audience why the work is problematic but why it is being presented in any case? And can the latter be done without patronizing the audience, lecturing them as if they were little children?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The third question concerns the problematic artist, and what to do with his (in my experience, it’s always been a “his”) works, even when the works themselves are great and do not present questionable ethical views. Sometimes my second and third questions can overlap (for example<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These questions are difficult to teach for a few reasons. One is that you cannot simply work in the abstract: if a work has racist elements, if a work eroticizes sexual violence<\/a>, then one needs to see how, and that can, for some students, involve some genuine hardship. I try to give lots of advance warning to what’s going to be up for discussion, and to not require attendance or participation, or explanation, for any student who wants to be excused.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A second reason is that students are, quite understandably, reticent, very cautious about putting a foot wrong, being judged as insensitive (or over-sensitive). Here I try to draw them out by admitting sincerely to my own uncertainties surrounding these questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the end, I try to help them see there is no formula to be applied – every work, every time and place and audience and company, are unique, and require a weighing of factors. There is no, to use the education-bureaucrat’s phrase, “learning outcome” here. Just an exercise in judgment and empathy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written, or badly written. That is all.” So says Oscar Wilde. Is he right? A new issue of the British Journal of Aesthetics has arrived in my mailbox, and the October 2022 issue is devoted to the question(s) of art […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2857,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2856","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-issues","8":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/butterfly.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3dIW5-K4","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2327,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2018\/03\/is-there-an-ethical-case-against-deaccessioning-by-museums\/","url_meta":{"origin":2856,"position":0},"title":"Is there an ethical case against deaccessioning by museums? Updated","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"March 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"In response to a post by artsjournal.com blog neighbor Lee Rosenbaum on proposed sales of works by the Berkshire Museum and the Lasalle University Art Museum, I asked via Twitter whether there was a coherent case to be made that deaccessioning is unethical, and not simply (sometimes) a case of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1541,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/09\/what-have-the-romans-ever-done-for-us\/","url_meta":{"origin":2856,"position":1},"title":"What have the Romans ever done for us?","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"September 28, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Think of your cultural consumption in your late teens. It was pretty great, wasn't it? Favorite bands, and getting their new LP within days of release, favorite magazines about music and films and books, lining up to get tickets for the movie everyone in the papers was talking about. I\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stones were so much better then","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/records.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1269,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/05\/but-i-know-what-i-like\/","url_meta":{"origin":2856,"position":2},"title":"But I know what I like","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"May 2, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"At Guardian Books, Will Self, for a forthcoming lecture, writes: I believe the\u00a0serious novel will continue to be written and read, but it will be an art form on a par with easel painting or classical music: confined to a defined social and demographic group, requiring a degree of subsidy,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"IV = PQ?","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/self-quantity-theory-197x300.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1557,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/10\/is-amazon-com-a-monopoly\/","url_meta":{"origin":2856,"position":3},"title":"Is Amazon.com a monopoly? (updated October 10)","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"October 1, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"In a comment on my previous post, on Amazon and what I saw as overheated rhetoric regarding censorship, BobG wrote: Arguing over a definition of censorship is avoiding the actual issue. Amazon IS making it difficult to get certain books (that\u2019s their announced strategy) and they are poised to become\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"still don't need it","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/jail-card-monopoly.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/jail-card-monopoly.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/jail-card-monopoly.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/jail-card-monopoly.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":567,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/03\/about-those-museum-prices\/","url_meta":{"origin":2856,"position":4},"title":"About those museum prices","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"March 28, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"My post staking a claim that $25 to visit the Metropolitan Museum of Art was not expensive generated some comments. There are two issues at play here, not entirely separable: first, that compared to other genres of art, high and low, $25 to see what is one of the world's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"we get letters","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/postbox-224x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2842,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2023\/03\/really-it-is-ok-for-a-college-to-sell-art\/","url_meta":{"origin":2856,"position":5},"title":"Really, it is OK for a college to sell art","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A few days ago I wrote a post re Valparaiso University's plans to sell three paintings, with an estimated total market value of $10 million, to deal with its rather dire financial situation, and to make investments seen necessary to attract students, whose numbers have fallen dramatically over the past\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/postbox.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2856"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2856\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2860,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2856\/revisions\/2860"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2857"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}